IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/halshs-03882730.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dealing with redundancies among criteria in multicriteria decision making through independent component analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Grabisch

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Redundancies among criteria are frequently observed in multicriteria decision making problems. This aspect may introduce bias in the achieved ranking, since alternatives that have a good performance only in redundant criteria will be favored in comparison with other ones. Aiming at dealing with this inconvenience, several sophisticated approaches were developed in the literature. Most of them require subjective information provided by the decision maker in order to define the set of parameters. In this paper, we consider one of the simplest and most used method, called weighted arithmetic mean, and propose some approaches to automatically adjust the weights in order to deal with redundant criteria. For this purpose, we formulate the problem as a blind source separation one and apply independent component analysis techniques to extract the information used to perform the adjustments. Numerical experiments in both synthetic and real data attest our proposal. Moreover, we extend the proposed approaches to deal with group multicriteria decision making problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Grabisch, 2022. "Dealing with redundancies among criteria in multicriteria decision making through independent component analysis," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03882730, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-03882730
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03882730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03882730/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berrah, L. & Mauris, G. & Montmain, J., 2008. "Monitoring the improvement of an overall industrial performance based on a Choquet integral aggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 340-351, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Fan & Liao, Huchang & Al-Barakati, Abdullah, 2023. "Physician selection based on user-generated content considering interactive criteria and risk preferences of patients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2016. "A note on the Sobol' indices and interactive criteria," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16003, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Koc, T. & Bozdag, E., 2017. "Measuring the degree of novelty of innovation based on Porter's value chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 559-567.
    3. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.
    4. Alessio Bonetti & Silvia Bortot & Mario Fedrizzi & Silvio Giove & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira & Andrea Molinari, 2011. "Modelling group processes and effort estimation in Project Management using the Choquet integral: an MCDM approach," DISA Working Papers 2011/12, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised Sep 2011.
    5. Denguir-Rekik, Afef & Montmain, Jacky & Mauris, Gilles, 2009. "A possibilistic-valued multi-criteria decision-making support for marketing activities in e-commerce: Feedback Based Diagnosis System," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 876-888, June.
    6. Silvia Bortot & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira, 2011. "Inconsistency and non-additive Choquet integration in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," DISA Working Papers 2011/06, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 29 Jul 2011.
    7. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Feyzioglu, Orhan & Sakir Ersoy, Mehmet, 2009. "Evaluation of 4PL operating models: A decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 112-120, September.
    8. Murcia, Nathanaëlle N.S. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Ferreira, João J.M., 2022. "Enhancing strategic management using a “quantified VRIO”: Adding value with the MCDA approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Li Zheng & Claude Baron & Philippe Esteban & Rui Xue & Qiang Zhang, 2016. "Pointing out the gap between academic research and supporting software tools in the domain of the performance measurement management of engineering projects," Post-Print hal-01496409, HAL.
    10. Alessio Ishizaka & Maynard Gordon, 2017. "MACBETHSort: a multiple criteria decision aid procedure for sorting strategic products," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(1), pages 53-61, January.
    11. Silvia Bortot & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira & Anastasia Stamatopoulou, 2020. "Shapley and superShapley aggregation emerging from consensus dynamics in the multicriteria Choquet framework," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 583-611, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-03882730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.