Sharing beliefs: between agreeing and disagreeing
AbstractWe show that when decision makers are of the multiple prior kind, there is an equivalence between no betting and non empty intersection of the sets of priors.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) with number halshs-00174553.
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published, Econometrica, 2000, 685-694
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00174553
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
multiple prior; betting;
Other versions of this item:
- Billot, A. & Chateauneuf, A. & Gilboa, I. & Tallon, J.-M., 1998. "Sharing Beliefs: Between Agreeing and Disagreeing," Papiers d'Economie MathÃÂ©matique et Applications, UniversitÃÂ© PanthÃÂ©on-Sorbonne (Paris 1) 98.30, UniversitÃ© PanthÃ©on-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
- D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
- D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.