IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/guc/wpaper/54.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Egypt-Mercosur FTA: A Complementarity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hebatallah Ghoneim

    (Faculty of Management Technology, German University in Cairo)

  • Rana Abdulmonem

    (Faculty of Management Technology, German University in Cairo)

  • Noha Ghazy

    (Faculty of Managemennt Technology, German University in Cairo)

Abstract

In 2010, Egypt signed a preferential Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the Common Market of the South (Mercosur).Correspondingly, this paper evaluates the success of this FTA by measuring the degree of complementarity between the two economies

Suggested Citation

  • Hebatallah Ghoneim & Rana Abdulmonem & Noha Ghazy, 2021. "Egypt-Mercosur FTA: A Complementarity Analysis," Working Papers 54, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    • Handle: RePEc:guc:wpaper:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mgt.guc.edu.eg/wpapers/054Ghoneim_2021.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piazolo, Daniel, 1997. "Trade Integration between Eastern and Western Europe: Policies Follow the Market," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 12, pages 259-297.
    2. Drysdale, Peter & Garnaut, Ross, 1982. "Trade Intensities and the Analysis of Bilateral Trade Flows in a Many-Country World : A Survey," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 22(2), pages 62-84, February.
    3. Assem Reda Abu Hatab & Nada Abdelhamed Shoumann & Huo Xuexi, 2012. "Exploring Egypt‐China bilateral trade: dynamics and prospects," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 314-326, July.
    4. Neves, J. Anchieta & Stocco, Leandro & Da Silva, Sergio, 2007. "Is Mercosur an optimum currency area?," MPRA Paper 2758, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2008. "Empirical relevance of the Hillman condition for revealed comparative advantage: 10 stylized facts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(18), pages 2313-2328.
    6. Ananda Jayawickrama & Shandre M. Thangavelu, 2010. "Trade linkages between China, India and Singapore," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 248-266, August.
    7. Assem Reda Abu Hatab & Nada Abdelhamed Shoumann & Huo Xuexi, 2012. "Exploring Egypt-China bilateral trade: dynamics and prospects," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 39(3), pages 314-326, December.
    8. Pitigala, Nihal, 2005. "What does regional trade in South Asia reveal about future trade integration? Some empirical evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3497, The World Bank.
    9. Michaely, Michael, 1996. "Trade preferential agreements in Latin America : an ex-ante assessment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1583, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khadan, Jeetendra & Hosein, Roger, 2014. "Trade, Economic and Welfare impacts of the CARICOM-Canada Free Trade Agreement," MPRA Paper 54836, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. A. Ganesh Kumar & Gordhan Kumar Saini, 2007. "Economic co-operation in South Asia: The Dilemma of SAFTA and beyond," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2007-017, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    3. Khadan, Jeetendra & Hosein, Roger, 2014. "Trade, Economic and Welfare impacts of the CARICOM-Canada Free Trade Agreement," MPRA Paper 54836, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee & Scott Hegerty & Amr Hosny, 2015. "Exchange-rate volatility and commodity trade between the E.U. and Egypt: evidence from 59 industries," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 42(1), pages 109-129, February.
    5. Khadan, Jeetendra & Hosein, Roger, 2013. "New Empirical Insights into the “Natural Trading Partner” Hypothesis for CARICOM Countries," MPRA Paper 50493, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Lord, Montague, 2015. "Regional Economic Integration in Central Asia and South Asia," MPRA Paper 66436, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Meenu Tewari & C. Veeramani, 2016. "Network Trade and Development: What Do Patterns of Vertically Specialized Trade in ASEAN Tell Us About India’s Place in Asian Production Networks?," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(2), pages 349-388, June.
    8. Javeria Maryam & Ashok Mittal, 2019. "An empirical analysis of India’s trade in goods with BRICS," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(4), pages 399-421, December.
    9. Rajiv Kumar, 2011. "SAARC: Changing Realities, Opportunities and Challenges," Chapters, in: Ulrich Volz (ed.), Regional Integration, Economic Development and Global Governance, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Jean-Claude Maswana, 2020. "African Economies in the Shadow of China: Effects of Bilateral Trade Structure on Economic Growth in Africa," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(1), pages 80-92, February.
    11. Xiaosong Zheng & Lijun Jia & Jiawen Bao & Jiao Chen, 2018. "A Study of Trade Complementarity between China and the Baltic States and its Development Strategies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 788-788, August.
    12. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq, 2020. "Latency and Economic Concert of India’s Trade with Russia: An Empirical Investigation," MPRA Paper 104716, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Nov 2020.
    13. World Bank, 2006. "Is There a New Vision for Maghreb Economic Integation? Volume 2. Annex," World Bank Publications - Reports 19624, The World Bank Group.
    14. Daniel Piazalo, 2000. "Poland's Membership in the European Union: An Analysis with a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model," LICOS Discussion Papers 8900, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    15. Ahmed, Saira & Ahmed, Vaqar & Sohail, Safdar, 2010. "Trade agreements between developing countries: a case study of Pakistan - Sri Lanka free trade agreement," MPRA Paper 29209, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Laosutsan, Pheesphan & Shivakoti, Ganesh P. & Soni, Peeyush, 2016. "Comparative advantage and export potential of Thai vegetable products following the integration into the ASEAN Economic Community," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), December.
    17. Sharma Vipin & Kumar Vinod, 2021. "Trade potential under the SAFTA between India and other SAARC countries: the augmented gravity model approach," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 81-97, September.
    18. Paul Brenton & Francesca Di Mauro & Matthias Lücke, 2014. "Economic Integration and FDI: An Empirical Analysis off Foreign Investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: INTERNATIONAL TRADE, DISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT Empirical Studies of Trade Policies, chapter 7, pages 125-151, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. A Salim, Ruhu & Mahfuz Kabir, Mohammad, 2011. "Does More Trade Potential Remain in Arab States of the Gulf ?," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 26, pages 217-243.
    20. Rodolfo G. Campos & Benedikt Heid & Jacopo Timini, 2024. "The economic consequences of geopolitical fragmentation: Evidence from the Cold War," Papers 2404.03508, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Complementarity Index; Egypt; Mercosur; Preferential Free Trade Agree-ment; Tariffs; Trade;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:guc:wpaper:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr.Dina Yousri (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmguceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.