Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A single minded European representation? From illusion and delusion to reality of a European single seat

Contents:

Author Info

  • Miguel Rocha de Sousa

    ()
    (Universidade de Évora, Departamento de Economia e NICPRI-UE)

Abstract

We justify why a single seat from European members in international fora might be preferable than a multitude of seats. Leech and Leech (2005), Eichengreen (2008) proposed this reform at the IMF. Why? Even though nowadays European Union has an aggregate voting power that is higher than its? respective (expected) share in world output or population weight; If the single seat is obtained, more coordinated expected outcomes can be achieved. This line of reasoning is compatible with the single mindedness theory created by Mulligan and Sala-I-Martin and further extended by Canegrati. Focusing in one policy gives more political power for the single European seat.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/8472
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal) in its series Economics Working Papers with number 2_2010.

as in new window
Length: 15 pages
Date of creation: 2010
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:evo:wpecon:2_2010

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7000 - 803ÉVORA
Phone: + 351 266 74 08 94
Fax: + 351 266 74 24 94
Email:
Web page: http://www.decon.uevora.pt
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Coordination; EU; International Organizations Reform; IMF; Political economy models; Single European seat; Single mindedness theory; Voting power;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:evo:wpecon:2_2010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maria Aurora Murcho Galego).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.