This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Understanding the Election Results in Portugal, A spatial econometrics point of view

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
António Caleiro () (Department of Economics, University of Évora)
Gertrudes Guerreiro () (Department of Economics, University of Évora)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The great majority of the theoretical analysis about electoral cycles has considered the national space as the territory of interest for the study of the economic consequences of an electoralist behaviour by the central government. This fact, in conjunction to the nature of the data most commonly available, has lead many authors to empirical studies which, by the use of more or less sophisticated econometric techniques, intend to verify the empirical evidence of electoral cycles whether in their political versions or in their partisan versions. Given that the election results for the main parties, at least for Portugal, clearly reflect some spatial localization we find rather intriguing to verify that so very few of those empirical studies use spatial econometrics techniques. This being said, the main objective of the paper is to analyse the results corresponding to the last legislative election that took place in Portugal, from the partisan viewpoint, by the use of well-known techniques of spatial econometrics. The confrontation of the results with the ones obtained ignoring the spatial localization of the data will lead us to the nature and extent of the improvement on the results obtained by spatial econometrics techniques in what concerns the detection of empirical evidence supporting the existence of a link between voters’ ideology and the election results obtained by the two main parties in Portugal.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.decon.uevora.pt/working_papers.php?id=36
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal) in its series Economics Working Papers with number 12_2003.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 11 pages
Date of creation: 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:evo:wpecon:12_2003

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7000 - 803�VORA
Phone: + 351 266 74 08 94
Fax: + 351 266 74 24 94
Email:
Web page: http://www.decon.uevora.pt
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (José Manuel Madeira Belbute).

Related research
Keywords: Elections; Partisan Models; Portugal; Spatial Econometrics; Voters;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
R12 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 journals are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.