IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/etd/wpaper/022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alleviating the Barriers to Domestic Investment in Addis Ababa: Underlying Causes and Proposed Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Berihu Assefa

    (Ethiopian Development Research Institute)

  • Mulu Gebre-eyesus

    (Ethiopian Development Research Institute)

  • Firew Weldeyes

    (Ethiopian Development Research Institute)

Abstract

Ethiopian Investment Commission (EIC) database shows that only 9.5% have become operational out of the total number of 80,419 domestic investment projects who received investment license in the last 25 years (1992-2017). The conversion rate of investment projects into operation in the capital city, Addis Ababa, is even much lower (only 6.4%) than the national average (9.5%). By any standard, this is one of the lowest investment conversion rates, and hence is quite worrying. This study tries to answer why above 90% of domestic investors were not able to move beyond the licensing stage to start operating and specifically identify the major constraints face by the domestic private investors. Unlike previous studies who rely on survey of existing firms, this study gathered information on the major constraints not only from successful ones but also from those investors got stacked or discouraged. A qualitative survey was conducted on a total of 42 firms (investors) in Addis Ababa mostly from manufacturing. The main finding of the study is that the key barriers to investment are related to lack of access to land, finance, regulatory and institutional inefficiency, poor infrastructure particularly power and lack of skills. The study contains a detailed manifestation of each of these problems. The overall implication is that the poor business environment is not only undermining exiting firms but also discouraging new investments and transition from project to operation. This study provides some policy suggestions on how to improve the low conversion rates and induce the development of a more dynamic domestic manufacturing sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Berihu Assefa & Mulu Gebre-eyesus & Firew Weldeyes, 2018. "Alleviating the Barriers to Domestic Investment in Addis Ababa: Underlying Causes and Proposed Solutions," Working Papers 022, Policy Studies Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:etd:wpaper:022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://psi.gov.et/index.php/working-papers/file/55-alleviating-the-barriers-to-domestic-investment-in-addis-ababa-underlying-causes-and-proposed-solutions?tmpl=component
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Canice Prendergast, 2003. "The Limits of Bureaucratic Efficiency," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(5), pages 929-958, October.
    2. Ermias Engida & Eyasu Tsehaye & Seneshaw Tamru, 2011. "Does Electricity Supply Strategy Matter? Shortage and Investment:Reflections based on CGE Analysis," Working Papers 006, Policy Studies Institute.
    3. Nicholas Bloom & Aprajit Mahajan & David McKenzie & John Roberts, 2010. "Why Do Firms in Developing Countries Have Low Productivity?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 619-623, May.
    4. Olson, Philip D. & Bosserman, Debra A., 1984. "Attributes of the entrepreneurial type," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 53-56.
    5. Casey Ichniowski & Kathryn Shaw, 1995. "Old Dogs and New Tricks: Determinants of the Adoption of Productivity-Enhancing Work Practices," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 26(1995 Micr), pages 1-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Girum Abebe, 2012. "Ownership, Management Practices, Upgrading, and Productivity in the Metalworking sector: Evidence from Ethiopia," Working Papers 009, Policy Studies Institute.
    2. Francesco Amodio & Miguel A. Martinez-Carrasco, 2023. "Workplace Incentives and Organizational Learning," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 453-478.
    3. Qian, Nancy & Lagakos, David & Moll, Benjamin & Porzio, Tommaso, 2012. "Experience Matters: Human Capital and Development Accounting," CEPR Discussion Papers 9253, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Torsten Heinrich & Jangho Yang & Shuanping Dai, 2020. "Growth, development, and structural change at the firm-level: The example of the PR China," Papers 2012.14503, arXiv.org.
    5. Antonia Grohmann & Lukas Menkhoff & Helke Seitz, 2022. "The Effect of Personalized Feedback on Small Enterprises’ Finances in Uganda," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(3), pages 1197-1227.
    6. Islam, Asif & Hyland, Marie, 2019. "The drivers and impacts of water infrastructure reliability – a global analysis of manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 143-157.
    7. Vittorio Bassi & Raffaela Muoio & Tommaso Porzio & Ritwika Sen & Esau Tugume, 2022. "Achieving Scale Collectively," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2937-2978, November.
    8. Bassi, Vittorio & Nyshadham, Anant & Tamayo, Jorge & Adhvaryu, Achyuta, 2020. "No Line Left Behind: Assortative Matching Inside the Firm," CEPR Discussion Papers 14554, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Florian Léon, 2022. "The elusive quest for high-growth firms in Africa: when other metrics of performance say nothing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 225-246, January.
    10. Johannes Boehm & Swati Dhingra & John Morrow, 2022. "The Comparative Advantage of Firms," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(12), pages 3025-3100.
    11. repec:awi:wpaper:0421 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Axel Demenet, 2016. "Does Managerial Capital also Matter Among Micro and Small Firms in Developing Countries?," Working Papers DT/2016/12, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    13. Axel Demenet & Quynh Hoang, 2018. "How important are management practices for the productivity of small and medium enterprises?," WIDER Working Paper Series 69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Natalie Chun & Soohyung Lee, 2015. "Bonus compensation and productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing plant-level data," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 47-58, February.
    15. Boucekkine, Raouf & Crifo, Patricia, 2008. "Human Capital Accumulation And The Transition From Specialization To Multitasking," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 320-344, June.
    16. Sheng, Xin & Guo, Songlin & Chang, Xiaochen, 2022. "Managerial myopia and firm productivity: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Dirk H M Akkermans, 2017. "Net profit flow per country from 1980 to 2009: The long-term effects of foreign direct investment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
    18. Charles Angelucci & Antonio Russo, 2022. "Petty Corruption And Citizen Reports," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(2), pages 831-848, May.
    19. repec:zib:zbmbmj:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:77-83 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Abhay Aneja & Nirupama Kulkarni & S. K. Ritadhi, 2021. "Consumption Tax Reform and the Real Economy: Evidence From India's Adoption of a Value‐Added Tax," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 569-602, September.
    21. Kapri, Kul & Ghimire, Shankar, 2020. "Migration, remittance, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from the Nepal Living Standard Survey," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    22. Christopher Boudreaux & George Clarke & Anand Jha, 2022. "Social capital and small informal business productivity: the mediating roles of financing and customer relationships," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 955-976, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ethiopia; Addis Ababa; investment; conversion rate; domestic; barrier; qualitative research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • D25 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice: Investment, Capacity, and Financing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etd:wpaper:022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dagmawi Atnafu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.psi.gov.et .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.