IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/epa/cepawp/2001-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trends in Earnings Inequality and Unemployment Across the OECD: Labor Market Institutions and Simple Supply and Demand Stories

Author

Abstract

Grounded in the standard supply and demand model, the conventional wisdom assumes a tradeoff between earnings inequality and unemployment, blames low skills for high earnings inequality in the U.S. and U.K., and attributes high European unemployment to institutional constraints. This paper finds little evidence of a tradeoff between earnings inequality and unemployment across OECD countries, and while welfare state institutions aimed at employment, unemployment, and wage protection matter a great deal for differences and changes in earnings inequality, they do not appear to be the main source of OECD employment problems. This evidence suggests a need to move beyond the policy implications of the simple textbook model. Specifically, returning to a more compressed wage distribution is not likely to create "European" levels of unemployment in the U.S., and greater earnings inequality is not likely to fix employment problems in Europe. Policy makers should give more credence to the view that the right kind of labor market institutions can further both egalitarian and efficiency goals.

Suggested Citation

  • David Howell & Friedrich Huebler, 2001. "Trends in Earnings Inequality and Unemployment Across the OECD: Labor Market Institutions and Simple Supply and Demand Stories," SCEPA working paper series. 2001-02, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
  • Handle: RePEc:epa:cepawp:2001-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/scepa/publications/workingpapers/2001/cepa0123.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oren M. Levin-Waldman, 2017. "Is Inequality Designed or Preordained?," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, April.
    2. G. Antonelli & P. P. Calia & G. Guidetti, 2014. "Approaching an investigation of multi-dimensional inequality through the lenses of variety in models of capitalism," Working Papers wp984, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    3. Carsten Ochsen, 2006. "Zukunft der Arbeit und Arbeit der Zukunft in Deutschland," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(2), pages 173-193, May.
    4. John Schmitt & Jonathan Wadsworth, 2002. "Is the OECD Jobs Strategy Behind US and British Employment and Unemployment Success in the 1990s?," SCEPA working paper series. 2002-06, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    5. Oren M. Levin-Waldman, 2004. "Exploring the Demographic Factors Affecting Passage of Living Wage Ordinances," Working Papers wp88, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    6. Andrew Glyn, 2002. "Labour Market Success and Labour Market Reform: Lessons from Ireland and New Zealand," SCEPA working paper series. 2002-03, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    7. Levin-Waldman, Oren M., 2008. "Characteristics of cities that pass living wage ordinances: Are certain conditions more conducive than others?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2201-2213, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unemployment; earnings inequality; skills; institutions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epa:cepawp:2001-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bridget Fisher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.