Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases

Contents:

Author Info

  • David Pontille

    (Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation, Mines ParisTech)

  • Didier Torny

    (Risques, Travail, Marchés, État (RiTME), INRA (UR 1323))

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    From a perspective informed by science and technology studies, the authors propose to establish a general diagnosis on the regulation of publication practices and suggest methods of analysis by drawing on old and recent cases that have been questionning research integrity.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.csi.mines-paristech.fr/working-papers/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_031.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech in its series CSI Working Papers Series with number 031.

    as in new window
    Length: 13 pages
    Date of creation: Jan 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:emn:wpaper:031

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 60 boulevard Saint Michel, 75272 Paris cedex 06
    Phone: + 33.1.40.51.92.88
    Fax: + 33.1.43.54.56.28
    Web page: http://www.csi.mines-paristech.fr/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: science and technology studies; sciences; research; researcher; article; journal; peer-reviewing; prevention; biomedical information; reliability;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Sergio Sismondo, 2007. "Ghost Management: How Much of the Medical Literature Is Shaped Behind the Scenes by the Pharmaceutical Industry?," Working Papers id:1254, eSocialSciences.
    2. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Jensen, Kyle & Murray, Fiona, 2012. "Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 276-290.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:emn:wpaper:031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Florence Paterson).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.