IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/115015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Level best? The levelling up agenda and UK regional inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Fransham, Mark
  • Herbertson, Max
  • Pop, Mihaela
  • Bandeira Morais, Margarida
  • Lee, Neil

Abstract

‘Levelling up’ - a policy agenda focused on reducing regional inequalities - has become the new mantra in British politics. This paper reviews and critiques the agenda from its beginnings in 2019 to the publication of the 2022 Levelling Up White Paper. The agenda is an overdue recognition of gross regional inequality, and the new ‘missions’ which are set out to drive change are welcome. Yet local institutions lack capacity to deliver, there has been little genuine devolution, and the mechanisms through which the ‘missions’ will actually be delivered are unclear. Our analysis of spending commitments shows little new money has been committed, and what has been committed has tended to be through top-down competitive bids. There is a danger that levelling up becomes the latest in a list of politically useful but empty slogans which are used as a substitute for resources and devolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Fransham, Mark & Herbertson, Max & Pop, Mihaela & Bandeira Morais, Margarida & Lee, Neil, 2022. "Level best? The levelling up agenda and UK regional inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115015, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/115015/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Nurse & Olivier Sykes, 2020. "Place-based vs. place blind? – Where do England’s new local industrial strategies fit in the ‘levelling up’ agenda?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 277-296, June.
    2. Diane Coyle & Marianne Sensier, 2020. "The imperial treasury: appraisal methodology and regional economic performance in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 283-295, March.
    3. Carrascal-Incera, Andre & McCann, Philip & Ortega-Argilés, Raquel & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2020. "Uk Interregional Inequality In A Historical And International Comparative Context," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 253, pages 4-17, August.
    4. R L Martin & J S C Hodge, 1983. "The Reconstruction of British Regional Policy: 1. The Crisis of Conventional Practice," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 1(2), pages 133-152, June.
    5. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    6. Mark Sandford, 2019. "Money talks: The finances of English Combined Authorities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(2), pages 106-122, March.
    7. (IFS), Institute for Fiscal Studies & Mirrlees, James (ed.), 2011. "Tax By Design: The Mirrlees Review," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199553747.
    8. Joan R Rosés & Nikolaus Wolf, 2021. "Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900–2015," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 17-48.
    9. Buscha, Franz & Gorman, Emma & Sturgis, Patrick, 2021. "Spatial and social mobility in England and Wales: a sub-national analysis of differences and trends over time," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111605, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Francis J. Greene & Kevin F. Mole & David J. Storey, 2004. "Does More Mean Worse? Three Decades of Enterprise Policy in the Tees Valley," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1207-1228, June.
    11. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    12. Stephen Hincks & Iain Deas & Graham Haughton, 2017. "Real Geographies, Real Economies and Soft Spatial Imaginaries: Creating a ‘More than Manchester’ Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 642-657, July.
    13. Andrew Westwood & Marianne Sensier & Nicola Pike, 2021. "Levelling Up, Local Growth and Productivity in England," Insight Papers 005, The Productivity Institute.
    14. Ann Markusen, 2003. "Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 701-717.
    15. Sarah Ayres & Matthew Flinders & Mark Sandford, 2018. "Territory, power and statecraft: understanding English devolution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 853-864, June.
    16. Peter O’Brien & Andy Pike, 2019. "‘Deal or no deal?’ Governing urban infrastructure funding and financing in the UK City Deals," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1448-1476, May.
    17. John Hills & Liz Richardson, 2000. "View of the National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal," CASE Reports casereport11, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    18. David Beel & Martin Jones & Ian Rees Jones & Warren Escadale, 2017. "Connected growth: Developing a framework to drive inclusive growth across a city-region," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(6), pages 565-575, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marianne Sensier & Elvira Uyarra, 2020. "Investigating the Governance Mechanisms that Sustain Regional Economic Resilience and Inclusive Growth," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2005, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Javier Terrero-Dávila & Neil Lee, 2023. "Left-behind versus unequal places: interpersonal inequality, economic decline and the rise of populism in the USA and Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 951-977.
    3. David Richards & Sam Warner & Martin J Smith & Diane Coyle, 2023. "Crisis and state transformation: Covid-19, levelling up and the UK’s incoherent state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 31-48.
    4. John Holden & Marianne Sensier & Richard Allmendinger, 2021. "The North West of England's Productivity Challenge: Exploring the issues," Insight Papers 003, The Productivity Institute.
    5. Marianne Sensier & Fiona Devine, 2020. "Levelling up Regional Resilience Following the Coronavirus Pandemic," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2008, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    6. Neil Lee, 2019. "Inclusive Growth in cities: a sympathetic critique," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 424-434, March.
    7. Adrian Pabst & Andrew Westwood, 2021. "The Politics of Productivity: institutions, governance and policy," Working Papers 015, The Productivity Institute.
    8. Kate Broadhurst & Edward Steane & Vlad Mykhnenko & Nicholas Gray, 2023. "Intergovernmental dynamics in responding to COVID-19 in English and Australian cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 185-196.
    9. Geoff Bates & Charles Larkin & Nick Pearce & Laura Smyth, 2023. "Policy ‘R&D’, capacity and advocacy in English Combined Authorities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(3), pages 226-241, May.
    10. Glen Loutzenhiser & Elizabeth Mann, 2021. "Liquidity issues: solutions for the asset rich, cash poor," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3-4), pages 651-675, September.
    11. European Commission, 2013. "Tax reforms in EU Member States - Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability – 2013 Report," Taxation Papers 38, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    12. Robin Boadway & Pierre Pestieau, 2018. "The Dubious Case for Annual Wealth Taxation," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(02), pages 03-07, August.
    13. José Mª Durán-Cabré & Alejandro Esteller-Moré, 2014. "Tax professionals' view of the Spanish tax system: efficiency, equity and tax planning," Working Papers 2014/5, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    14. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Ademuyiwa A. Lawal, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Innovative Automobile Policy on Employment in Nigeria and China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 679-686, September.
    16. John Gathergood & Fabian Gunzinger & Benedict Guttman-Kenney & Edika Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2020. "Levelling Down and the COVID-19 Lockdowns: Uneven Regional Recovery in UK Consumer Spending," Papers 2012.09336, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    17. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    18. Hilber, Christian A.L. & Lyytikäinen, Teemu, 2017. "Transfer taxes and household mobility: Distortion on the housing or labor market?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 57-73.
    19. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    20. Doloreux, David & Parto, Saeed, 2005. "Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    levelling up; inequality; regions; cities; funding; policy; ES/V013548/1;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.