Assessing national values to protect the health of the Great Barrier Reef
AbstractThe Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is a vast iconic environmental asset covering an area of approximately 35 million hectares and as such is valued by people all over Australia, as well as overseas. While non-market values for the GBR will comprise both use and non-use values, the values of people who live closer and who can visit the GBR more frequently, are likely to be higher than those who live further away in more distant locations. The aim of the study outlined in this report was to estimate the values to protect the health of the GBR at the national level, and in doing so, examine the effects of distance decay on valuation estimates. A split sample choice modelling experiment was conducted in six locations: a regional town within the GBR catchment area (Townsville); Brisbane, the state capital approximately 450 km from the southern limit of the GBR and four other capital cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth) ranging from 730 km to over 3600 km from Brisbane. The results indicate that the total national value for a 1% improvement in the health of the GBR ranges from between a low of approximately $433.6 million to a high of $811.3 million depending on the underlying assumptions made. There was some evidence of distance decay in values with most decline occurring once outside the home state, and little further decline occurring once away from the east coast. There was no evidence to suggest any difference in patterns of use and non use values but the values of the potential future users that were most influential in determining WTP estimates.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University in its series Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports with number 1072.
Date of creation: Oct 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 0200
Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Web page: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/
More information through EDIRC
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- van Bueren, Martin & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2001.
"Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes,"
2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide
125993, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
- van Bueren, Martin & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2004. "Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(1), March.
- Robert Gillespie & Jeff Bennett, 2010.
"Non Use Economic Values of Marine Protected Areas in the South-West Marine Region,"
Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports
1083, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
- Gillespie, Robert & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2010. "Non Use Economic Values of Marine Protected Areas in the South-West Marine Region," Research Reports 107582, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
- Robert Gillespie & Jeff Bennett, 2011. "Non Use Economic Values of Marine Protected Areas in the South-West Marine Area," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 10103, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Crawford Webmaster).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.