IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col043/13109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investing better in order to invest more. Finance and management of education in Latin America and the Caribbean

Author

Listed:
  • -

Abstract

The reforms being undertaken by all the countries in the region (although with varying emphases and intensity); with a view to promoting a leap forward in quality and equity in education are all, generally speaking, focused on transforming various parts of the system: teaching and learning processes and content; financing of the system and resource allocation mechanisms; the distribution of functions between the State and private enterprise; decentralization of management, and, in some cases, education planning; monitoring of the quality of education services through review of teaching practices and assessment of outcomes; and the beginnings of an attempt to adapt curricula to students social and cultural conditions and to the requirements of the workplace. It is undoubtedly important to prioritize changes in education according to their impacts on student achievement because this makes it possible to realign investments in education in order to optimize their effectiveness. If the reforms have not produced all the expected benefits in terms of quality, equity or efficiency, then it becomes essential to assess past reforms, identify their successes and failures and, on that basis, modify reform paradigms in order to optimize the impact of additional resources. The point is not simply to invest more, but also to invest better. In order to assess countries financing needs for education, the present publication includes estimates of the total and additional costs that countries will need to cover between now and 2015 in order to achieve the following four major targets for educational progress agreed upon by the Governments of Latin America and the Caribbean as set forth in the Millennium Declaration, Education for All (EFA);, Regional Education Project for Latin America and the Caribbean (PRELAC); and the Summit of the Americas of 1998: achieving universal enrolment in primary education, ensuring universal completion of primary schooling, raising the net coverage of secondary education to 75% and eradicating adult illiteracy. On the basis of the financing shortfalls thus identified, the study looks at sources of funding that have not been sufficiently explored, such as contributions from the private sector and civil society, international cooperation and swapping debt servicing for investment in human capital. In addition, some of the main problems and challenges associated with improving the management of education are analysed with a view to determining how to ensure that resources invested in the education system are used more efficiently and have a greater impact on educational achievement and learning. These areas include placing school management at the service of learning; promoting greater social responsibility for education among providers, users and their families; assigning the school a special role in its management as a participatory learning community; and improving, as a matter of urgency, educational human resources and encouraging teachers to actively participate in and make a commitment to effective learning by their students.

Suggested Citation

  • -, 2005. "Investing better in order to invest more. Finance and management of education in Latin America and the Caribbean," Seminarios y Conferencias 13109, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col043:13109
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/13109
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idb:brikps:publication-detail,7101.html?id=68571 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sebastian Galiani & Ernesto Schargrodsky, 2002. "Evaluating the Impact of School Decentralization on Educational Quality," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Spring 20), pages 275-314, January.
    3. Pablo González & Alejandra Mizala & Pilar Romaguera, 2002. "Recursos diferenciados a la educación subvencionada en Chile," Documentos de Trabajo 150, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    4. -, 2004. "A decade of social development in Latin America, 1990-1999," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2383 edited by Eclac.
    5. Carnoy, Martin, 2002. "Are Educational Reforms Working in Latin America?: A New Look at Understanding Whether Education is Getting Better," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4489, Inter-American Development Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. -, 2007. "The millennium development goals and the challenges facing Latin America and the Caribbean in making progress towards higher levels of well-being, better human capital and more equal opportunities," Documentos de Proyectos 3601, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gallego Francisco, 2013. "When Does Inter-School Competition Matter? Evidence from the Chilean “Voucher” System," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 525-562, August.
    2. Eduardo Lora, 2007. "The State of State Reform in Latin America," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6642, December.
      • Galindo, Arturo & Scartascini, Carlos & Payne, J. Mark & Daughters, Robert & Melo, Alberto & Echebarría, Koldo & Lora, Eduardo & Filc, Gabriel & Micco, Alejandro & Chong, Alberto E. & Panizza, Ugo & B, 2007. "The State of State Reform in Latin America," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 352, May.
    3. Wise, Ramsey, 2015. "Does market-oriented education systems improve performance or increase inequality: A configurational comparative method for understanding (un)intended educational outcomes," TranState Working Papers 189, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    4. Fabio Sánchez, 2006. "Descentralización Y Progreso En El Acceso A Los Servicios Sociales De Educación, Salud Y Agua Y Alcantarillado," Documentos CEDE 2287, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    5. Buerger, Christian & Lincove, Jane Arnold & Mata, Catherine, 2023. "How context shapes the relationship between school autonomy and test-scores. An explanatory analysis using PISA 2015," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Jairo Núnez & Roberto Steiner & Ximena Cadena & Renata Pardo, 2002. "¿Cuáles Colegios Ofrecen Mejor Educación En Colombia?," Documentos CEDE 3796, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    7. Fabiana Machado, 2013. "Decentralization and Accountability: The Curse of Local Underdevelopment," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-397, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    8. Barankay, Iwan & Lockwood, Ben, 2007. "Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: Evidence from Swiss cantons," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 1197-1218, June.
    9. José-Ignacio Antón & Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo & Enrique Fernández Macías & Jesús Rivera, 2014. "Effects of health care decentralization in Spain from a citizens’ perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 411-431, May.
    10. Falch, Torberg & Fischer, Justina A.V., 2012. "Public sector decentralization and school performance: International evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 276-279.
    11. Ludger Wossmann, 2010. "Families, schools and primary-school learning: evidence for Argentina and Colombia in an international perspective," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(21), pages 2645-2665.
    12. Muhammad Ahsan Rana, 2017. "Business as Usual: District Education Authorities in Punjab," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 14(2), pages 176-197, September.
    13. Leonardo Letelier S & Hector Ormeño C, 2018. "Education and fiscal decentralization. The case of municipal education in Chile," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(8), pages 1499-1521, December.
    14. Paula Salinas & Albert Solé-Ollé, 2009. "Evaluating the effects of decentralization on educational outcomes in Spain," Working Papers 2009/10, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    15. Galiani, Sebastian & Gertler, Paul & Schargrodsky, Ernesto, 2008. "School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(10-11), pages 2106-2120, October.
    16. Mariano Tommasi, 2002. "Federalism in Argentina and the Reforms of the 1990s," Working Papers 48, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised May 2002.
    17. Cornelius O. Okorie & Francisca N. Ogba & Harrison O. Iwuala & Christopher Arua & Nwankwo Felix & Victor C. Nwosumba, 2022. "Decentralization of South Eastern Nigeria’s Local Governments and Achievement of Mandates Enshrined in Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    18. Paula Salinas, 2014. "The effect of decentralization on educational outcomes: real autonomy matters!," Working Papers 2014/25, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    19. Iftikhar Ahmad, 2016. "Assessing the Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on the Education Sector: A Cross-Country Analysis," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 53-96, July-Dec.
    20. Josep-Oriol Escardíbul & Nehal Helmy, 2015. "Decentralisation and school autonomy impact on the quality of education: the case of two MENA countries," Working Papers 2015/33, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col043:13109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.