Creditors often share their information about their customers' credit record, directly or via information brokers such as credit bureaus and rating agencies. Besides helping them to spot bad risks, this informational exchange acts as a disciplinary device. If creditors are known to exchange data about defaults, borrowers must consider that default on a current lender would disrupt their credit rating with all the other lenders. This disciplinary effect of information sharing can reduce the average default rate and increase the efficiency of the credit market, and it invariably sharpens competition between banks. But more detailed and extensive information sharing is not necessarily better: we show that the efficiency gains obtained obtained by pooling only data about past defaults can exceed those entailed by sharing all the information possesed by lenders.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by European Science Foundation Network in Financial Markets, c/o C.E.P.R, 53--56 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DG in its series CEPR Financial Markets Paper with number
0043.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)