IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnn/wpaper/17-004e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mobility and Continuity of Political Elites over Phases of Regime Change

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoko Matsumoto
  • Tetsuji Okazaki

Abstract

Despite its significance for regime change and state building, the impact of regime change on elite group has not received adequate scholarly attention. Using the newly constructed 2,979 government elites data after the Meiji Restoration in Japan, this Does changing the form of government actually change who are in power? Despite its significance for regime change and state building, the impact of regime change on the elite group has not received adequate scholarly attention. The new data on 2,980 government elites since the Meiji Restoration Japan (1868) revealed the three results: (i) the proportion of elites whose fathers were elites in the former regime is low in the regime transition phase but increases in the regime consolidation phase, (ii) the proportion of elites whose fathers were commoners increases throughout the regime change process, and (iii) the internal hierarchy of political elites begins to more intensively reflect the social stratum of the former regime and discount the people's own talents as the new regime consolidates. Regime change increases social mobility in the elite society but it does not last long.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoko Matsumoto & Tetsuji Okazaki, 2018. "Mobility and Continuity of Political Elites over Phases of Regime Change," CIGS Working Paper Series 17-004E, The Canon Institute for Global Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:17-004e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cigs.canon/article/uploads/pdf/workingpapers/180317_okazaki.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Clark, 2015. "The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10181-2.
    2. Ansell,Ben W. & Samuels,David J., 2014. "Inequality and Democratization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107000360.
    3. Acemoglu,Daron & Robinson,James A., 2009. "Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521671422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomoko Matsumoto & Tetsuji Okazaki, 2017. "Mobility and Continuity of Political Elites over Phases of Regime Change: Case of Meiji Restoration Japan," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1042, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    2. Lourdes ROJAS RUBIO, 2022. "Inequality, Corruption and Support for Democracy," THEMA Working Papers 2022-20, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    3. Marina Dodlova & Anna Gioblas, 2017. "Regime type, inequality, and redistributive transfers in developing countries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-30, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Dorsch, Michael T. & Maarek, Paul, 2020. "Economic downturns, inequality, and democratic improvements," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Michael Albertus & Victor Gay, 2017. "Unlikely Democrats: Economic Elite Uncertainty under Dictatorship and Support for Democratization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(3), pages 624-641, July.
    6. Dorsch, Michael T. & Maarek, Paul, 2020. "Economic downturns, inequality, and democratic improvements," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Dodlova, Marina & Giolbas, Anna, 2015. "Regime Type, Inequality, and Redistributive Transfers in Developing Countries," GIGA Working Papers 273, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    8. Stephen L. Parente & Luis Felipe Sáenz & Anna Seim, 2022. "Income, education and democracy," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 193-233, June.
    9. Dorsch, Michael T. & Maarek, Paul, 2019. "Democratization and the Conditional Dynamics of Income Distribution," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(2), pages 385-404, May.
    10. Michael Albertus & Victor Gay, 2019. "No better time than now: Future uncertainty and private investment under dictatorship," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 71-96, March.
    11. Dong-Hyeon Kim & Joyce Hsieh & Shu-Chin Lin, 2021. "Financial liberalization, political institutions, and income inequality," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1245-1281, March.
    12. George Tridimas, 2021. "Constitutional monarchy as power sharing," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 431-461, December.
    13. Ron Johnston & Charles Pattie, 2016. "The changing geography of voting Conservative in Great Britain: Is it all to do with inequality?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(2), pages 213-219, February.
    14. Israel Marques II, 2022. "Skipping Out On The Check: Institutional Quality, Tax Evasion, And Individual Preferences For Social Policy," HSE Working papers WP BRP 85/PS/2022, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    15. Kubinec, Robert & Milner, Helen, 2021. "Taxes in the Time of Revolution: An Experimental Test of the Rentier State during Algeria's Hirak," SocArXiv hu3vq, Center for Open Science.
    16. Samuels, David & Vargas, Thomas R., 2023. "Democracy, rural inequality, and education spending," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Neundorf, Anja & Gerschewski, Johannes & Olar, Roman-Gabriel, 2020. "How Do Inclusionary and Exclusionary Autocracies Affect Ordinary People?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 53(12), pages 1890-1925.
    18. Thai Q. Nguyen & Giang K. Nguyen, 2020. "The impacts of civil society and inequality on the extractive capacity of authoritarian regimes: a conceptual model and the case study of Vietnam," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 489-508, December.
    19. Thoenig, Mathias & Laurent-Lucchetti, Jeremy & Rohner, Dominic, 2019. "Ethnic Conflicts and the Informational Dividend of Democracy," CEPR Discussion Papers 14182, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Okada, Keisuke, 2018. "Health and political regimes: Evidence from quantile regression," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 307-319.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:17-004e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Canon Institute for Global Studies (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/canonjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.