This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Developing new approaches to measuring NHS outputs and productivity

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Diane Dawson () (Centre for Health Economics, University of York)
Hugh Gravelle () (National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, University of York)
Mary O'Mahony (National Institute for Economic and Social Research)
Andrew Street () (Centre for Health Economics, University of York)
Martin Weale (National Institute for Economic and Social Research)
Adriana Castelli () (Centre for Health Economics, University of York)
Rowena Jacobs () (Centre for Health Economics, University of York)
Paul Kind () (Centre for Health Economics, University of York)
Pete Loveridge (National Institute for Economic and Social Research)
Stephen Martin () (Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York)
Philip Stevens (National Institute for Economic and Social Research)
Lucy Stokes (National Institute for Economic and Social Research)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The Centre for Health Economics and National Institute of Economic and Social Research have recently completed a project funded by the Department of Health to improve measurement of the productivity of the NHS. The researchers have suggested better ways of measuring both outputs and inputs to improve estimates of productivity growth. Past estimates of NHS output growth have not taken account of changes in quality. The CHE/NIESR team conclude that the routine collection of health outcome data on patients is vital to measure NHS quality. They also propose making better use of existing data to quality adjust output indices to capture improvements in hospital survival rates and reductions in waiting times. With these limited adjustments the team estimate that annual NHS output growth averaged 3.79% between 1998/99 and 2003/04.The research team has also developed improved ways of measuring NHS inputs, particularly by drawing on better information about how many people are employed in the NHS and by recognising that staff are becoming increasingly better qualified. There have been substantial increases in staffing levels, pharmaceutical use and investment in equipment and buildings since 1998/99. The net effect of this growth in both outputs and inputs is that, according to the research team’s estimates, NHS productivity declined by about 1.59% a year since 1998/99. This is not out of line with estimates of growth rates in other UK and US service sectors, including insurance and business services. Nor is it surprising that recent years have seen negative growth in the NHS. There are at least two reasons. First, there has been an unprecedented increase in NHS expenditure. The NHS has had to employ more staff to meet the requirements of the European Working Time Directive and hospital consultants and general practitioners, in particular, have benefited from new pay awards.Second, the NHS collects very little information about what actually happens to patients as a result of their contact with the health service. Until there is routine collection of health outcomes data, measurement of the quality of NHS output will remain partial and productivity growth is likely to be underestimated.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/che/pdf/rp6.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2005
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 006cherp.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 218 pages
Date of creation: Sep 2005
Date of revision: Dec 2005
Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:6cherp

Contact details of provider:
Postal: York Y010 5DD
Phone: (01904) 321401
Email:
Web page: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/che
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Frances Sharp).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. David M. Cutler & Mark McClellan & Joseph P. Newhouse & Dahlia Remler, 1999. "Pricing Heart Attack Treatments," NBER Working Papers 7089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
    • David M. Cutler & Mark B. McClellan & Joseph P. Newhouse & Dahlia K. Remler, 2001. "Pricing Heart Attack Treatments," NBER Chapters, in: Medical Care Output and Productivity, pages 305-362 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
  2. Hugh Gravelle & Dave Smith, 2001. "Discounting for health effects in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(7), pages 587-599. [Downloadable!]
  3. Irving Shapiro & Matthew D. Shapiro & David Wilcox, 2001. "Measuring the value of Cataract Surgery," NBER Chapters, in: Medical Care Output and Productivity, pages 411-438 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
  4. Cutler, David M. & Huckman, Robert S., 2003. "Technological development and medical productivity: the diffusion of angioplasty in New York state," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 187-217, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Sherwin Rosen, 2002. "Markets and Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 1-15, March. [Downloadable!]
  6. Ernst R. Berndt & Susan Busch & Richard Frank, 2001. "Treatment Price Indexes for Acute Phase Major Depression," NBER Chapters, in: Medical Care Output and Productivity, pages 463-508 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
  7. Nancy Devlin & David Parkin, 2004. "Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(5), pages 437-452. [Downloadable!]
  8. Sefton & Weale, 2006. "The Concept of Income in a General Equilibrium," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 73(1), pages 219-249, 01. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Andrew Sharpe & Celeste Bradley & Hans Messinger, 2007. "The Measurement of Output and Productivity in the Health Care Sector in Canada: An Overview," CSLS Research Reports 2007-06, Centre for the Study of Living Standards. [Downloadable!]
  2. Adriana Castelli & Diane Dawson & Hugh Gravelle & Andrew Street, 2007. "Improving the measurement of health system output growth," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(10), pages 1091-1107. [Downloadable!]
  3. Katharina Hauck & Andrew Street, 2007. "Do targets matter? A comparison of English and Welsh National Health priorities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 275-290. [Downloadable!]
  4. Simon Eckermann & Tim Coelli, 2008. "Including quality attributes in a model of health care efficiency: A net benefit approach," CEPA Working Papers Series WP032008, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia. [Downloadable!]
  5. Peter Hart, 2007. "Productivity in the National Health Service," Economics & Management Discussion Papers em-dp2007-45, Henley Business School, Reading University. [Downloadable!]
  6. Mary O’Mahony & Philip Stevens, 2009. "Output and productivity growth in the education sector: comparisons for the US and UK," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 177-194, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Anthony Scott, 2005. "The Productivity of Doctors in Australia: The ‘Flat of the Curve’ and Beyond?," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2005n19, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
  8. Andrew Street & Padraic Ward, 2009. "NHS input and productivity growth 2003/4 - 2007/8," Working Papers 047cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
  9. Giorgio Marini & Andrew Street, 2006. "The administrative costs of payment by results," Working Papers 017cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
  10. Adriana Castelli & Peter C Smith, 2006. "Circulatory Disease in the NHS: Measuring Trends in Hospital Costs and Output," Working Papers 021cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
  11. Adriana Castelli & Mauro Laudicella & Andrew Street, 2008. "Measuring NHS Output Growth," Working Papers 043cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. [Downloadable!]
  12. Karen Bloor & Alan Maynard, 2006. "The productivity of health care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(12), pages 1257-1259. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? LogEc provides statistical analysis about downloads from this service (and others).

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.