IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/123chedp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Principles and agents in social care: who's on the case and for whom?

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsteen Smith
  • Ken Wright

Abstract

The economic theory of principal and agent is examined to assess its suitability for application to the world of social care. Principal and agent theory hinges on the bases of two individuals, the principal, who is ill-informed and the agent, who is informed. The principal hires the agent to act in such a way that the principal’s utility is improved. Information is passed on to the principal from the agent to allow rational allocation of services at a reasonable fee. The imbalance of information, however, causes problems in the relationship. The asymmetry can result in moral hazard or adverse selection when the agent “misuses” the information at his/her disposal. A considerable amount of literature exists in this area relating to the doctor-patient agency relationship. Here the doctor and patient have interdependent utility functions they try to maximise. The problem of supplier induced demand in fee for service systems has been found. This is the problem of doctors unwarrantedly increasing demand to maintain their income or other entities in their utility functions e.g. prestige, a producer’s moral hazard. It is believed that lessons from these situations can be applied to social care. In social care we have an agency relationship between the care manager and their clients. To assess this it is important to draw out the similarities and differences in this relationship. In some respects social care agency relationships are more interesting and challenging than the doctor/patient relationship because of the number of “agency” models available – care managers, advocates and service brokers. In this quest for understanding if such a relationship exists it is important to have information about care management itself to find out what exactly it is trying to do and how it functions. This is helped by taking examples of its operation from Britain and the USA for various client groups. The operation of the service is important to examine as this will allow us to understand how the service is coordinated and how budgets operate. The final section of the paper examines predictions by this application and suggests a research agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsteen Smith & Ken Wright, 1994. "Principles and agents in social care: who's on the case and for whom?," Working Papers 123chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:123chedp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE%20Discussion%20Paper%20123.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1994
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Culyer, A J, 1989. "The Normative Economics of Health Care Finance and Provision," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 34-58, Spring.
    2. Mark Pauly, 1980. "Doctors and Their Workshops: Economic Models of Physician Behavior," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number paul80-1, March.
    3. Robert G. Evans, 1974. "Supplier-Induced Demand: Some Empirical Evidence and Implications," International Economic Association Series, in: Mark Perlman (ed.), The Economics of Health and Medical Care, chapter 10, pages 162-173, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Phelps, Charles E., 1986. "Induced demand -- can we ever know its extent?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 355-365, December.
    5. Cromwell, Jerry & Mitchell, Janet B., 1986. "Physician-induced demand for surgery," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 293-313, December.
    6. Robert Evans & Alan Maynard & Alexander Preker & Uwe Reinhardt, 1994. "Health care reform," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(6), pages 359-359, November.
    7. Mooney, Gavin & Ryan, Mandy, 1993. "Agency in health care: Getting beyond first principles," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 125-135, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Ferguson, 1996. "Progress of the UK health reforms and the role of information: what can the "dismal science" contribute?," Working Papers 145chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lise Rochaix & Stéphane Jacobzone, 1997. "L'hypothèse de demande induite : un bilan économique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 25-36.
    2. Lien, Hsien-Ming & Albert Ma, Ching-To & McGuire, Thomas G., 2004. "Provider-client interactions and quantity of health care use," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1261-1283, November.
    3. Christian Schmid, 2015. "Consumer Health Information and the Demand for Physician Visits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(12), pages 1619-1631, December.
    4. Lise Rochaix, 1997. "Asymétries d'information et incertitude en santé : les apports de la théorie des contrats," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 11-24.
    5. Nguyen, Xuan Nguyen, 1996. "Physician volume response to price controls," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 189-204, February.
    6. Erin M. Johnson & M. Marit Rehavi, 2016. "Physicians Treating Physicians: Information and Incentives in Childbirth," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 115-141, February.
    7. E. Delattre & B. Dormont, 2000. "Testing for supplier-induced demand behavior : A panel data study on French physicians," THEMA Working Papers 2000-42, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    8. D. Fabbri & C. Monfardini, 2001. "Demand Induction with a Discrete Distribution of Patients," Working Papers 414, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    9. NOGUCHI Haruko & SATOSHI Shimizutani, 2005. "Supplier-Induced Demand in Japan's At-home Care Industry: Evidence from Micro-level Survey on Care Receivers," ESRI Discussion paper series 148, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    10. Nilgun Yavuz & Veli Yilanci & Zehra Ozturk, 2013. "Is health care a luxury or a necessity or both? Evidence from Turkey," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 5-10, February.
    11. Mangham-Jefferies, Lindsay & Hanson, Kara & Mbacham, Wilfred & Onwujekwe, Obinna & Wiseman, Virginia, 2014. "What determines providers' stated preference for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 98-106.
    12. Chen, Alice & Lakdawalla, Darius N., 2019. "Healing the poor: The influence of patient socioeconomic status on physician supply responses," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 43-54.
    13. Gruber, Jon & Kim, John & Mayzlin, Dina, 1999. "Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 473-490, August.
    14. Carl Hampus Lyttkens, 1999. "Imperatives in Health Care: Implications for Social Welfare and Medical Technology," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 25, pages 95-114.
    15. Hollingsworth, J. Rogers & Hanneman, Robert A. & Hage, Jerald, 1990. "Investment in Human Capital of a Powerful Interest Group: The Case of the Medical Profession in Britain, France, Sweden and the United States from 1890 to 1970," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    16. McPake, Barbara & Russo, Giuliano & Tseng, Fu-Min, 2014. "How do dual practitioners divide their time? The cases of three African capital cities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 113-121.
    17. Éric Delattre & Brigitte Dormont, 2000. "Induction de la demande de soins par les médecins libéraux français. Étude micro-économétrique sur données de panel," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 142(1), pages 137-161.
    18. Smith, Peter C. & Stepan, Adolf & Valdmanis, Vivian & Verheyen, Piet, 1997. "Principal-agent problems in health care systems: an international perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 37-60, July.
    19. Rudy Douven & Remco Mocking & Ilaria Mosca, 2012. "The Effect of Physician Fees and Density Differences on Regional Variation in Hospital Treatments," CPB Discussion Paper 208, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    20. Neuman, Einat & Neuman, Shoshana, 2007. "Agency in Health-Care: Are Medical Care-Givers Perfect Agents?," IZA Discussion Papers 2727, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    care management; asymmetry;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:123chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gill Forder (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.