IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_8886.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selling High-Tech Inputs to the Enemy

Author

Listed:
  • Yoonho Choi
  • E. Kwan Choi

Abstract

Trade wars are being waged by the United States and Japan. Exports of high-tech inputs (e.g., fluorinated polyimides in semiconductor devices) are now curbed by these countries. Manufacturing high-quality outputs require the use of high-tech inputs. Exports of high-tech inputs may not only increase the Northern innovator’s profit in the short run but also may create permanent rivals in the downstream market in developing countries. This paper investigates whether it is profitable for a Northern innovator to export high-tech inputs to foreign competitors who would compete in the downstream market. If wage disparity exists between the two countries when products are differentiated, selling the high-tech input to foreign competitors may be mutually beneficial for both the innovator and the foreign rivals in the South. When the finished products are homogeneous, selling only the high-tech input to a sufficiently large number of Southern firms, and exiting from the finished product market, may increase the innovator’s profit. Highlights: • It may be mutually profitable for the Northern innovator and Southern rivals to export and import the high-tech input in the homogeneous model. • When the final products are perfect substitutes, there is no incentive for the Northern innovator to sell the high-tech input to two Southern rivals. • It may be profitable for the Northern firm to stop producing the finished product, and to sell only the high-tech input to a sufficiently large number of Southern rivals.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoonho Choi & E. Kwan Choi, 2021. "Selling High-Tech Inputs to the Enemy," CESifo Working Paper Series 8886, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8886.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2008. "The Make-or-Buy Decision in the Presence of a Rival: Strategic Outsourcing to a Common Supplier," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1747-1758, October.
    2. repec:clu:wpaper:0708-12 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Manova, Kalina & Yu, Zhihong, 2017. "Multi-product firms and product quality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 116-137.
    4. Moresi, Serge & Schwartz, Marius, 2017. "Strategic incentives when supplying to rivals with an application to vertical firm structure," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-161.
    5. Kabiraj, Tarun & Sinha, Uday Bhanu, 2016. "Strategic outsourcing with technology transfer under price competition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 281-290.
    6. Taba Yumiko, 2016. "Optimal Product R&D Policies with Endogenous Quality Choices and Unilateral Spillover," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 365-391, January.
    7. Hallak, Juan Carlos & Sivadasan, Jagadeesh, 2013. "Product and process productivity: Implications for quality choice and conditional exporter premia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 53-67.
    8. Yasunori Ishii, 2014. "Quality–Price Competition and Product R&D Investment Policies in Developing and Developed Countries," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 90(289), pages 197-206, June.
    9. Lucia Foster & John Haltiwanger & Chad Syverson, 2008. "Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 394-425, March.
    10. Maurice Kugler & Eric Verhoogen, 2012. "Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(1), pages 307-339.
    11. Hallak, Juan Carlos, 2006. "Product quality and the direction of trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 238-265, January.
    12. Antoniades, Alexis, 2015. "Heterogeneous Firms, Quality, and Trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 263-273.
    13. Economides, Nicholas, 1998. "The incentive for non-price discrimination by an input monopolist," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 271-284, May.
    14. Choi, Yoonho & Kwan Choi, E., 2018. "Quality competition in north-south trade," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 216-224.
    15. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2010. "Input Price Discrimination When Buyers Operate In Multiple Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 846-867, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, Yoonho & Choi, E. Kwan, 2021. "Selling high-tech inputs to the enemy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Freitag, Andreas & Lein, Sarah M., 2023. "Endogenous product adjustment and exchange rate pass-through," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. SAITO Hisamitsu & MATSUURA Toshiyuki, 2016. "Agglomeration Economies, Productivity, and Quality Upgrading," Discussion papers 16085, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Maria Bas & Caroline Paunov, 2019. "What gains and distributional implications result from trade liberalization," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 19003, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Paulo Bastos & Daniel A. Dias & Olga A. Timoshenko, 2018. "Learning, prices and firm dynamics," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 1257-1311, November.
    6. Anne‐Célia Disdier & Carl Gaigné & Cristina Herghelegiu, 2023. "Do standards improve the quality of traded products?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1238-1290, November.
    7. Saito, Hisamitsu, 2021. "Foreign direct investment and quality upgrading in Indonesian manufacturing," MPRA Paper 106770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Bas, Maria & Paunov, Caroline, 2021. "Input quality and skills are complementary and increase output quality: Causal evidence from Ecuador’s trade liberalization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Jäkel, Ina C., 2019. "Product appeal, differences in tastes, and export performance: Evidence for Danish chocolate and confectionery," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 417-459.
    10. Picard, P.M., 2015. "Trade, economic geography and the choice of product quality," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 18-27.
    11. Brambilla, Irene & Porto, Guido G., 2016. "High-income export destinations, quality and wages," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 21-35.
    12. Xianhai Huang & Kun Liu & Hangyu Chen, 2020. "The puzzle of quality upgrading of Chinese exports from the trade liberalization perspective," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 161-184, May.
    13. Bie, Xiaodong & Ciani, Andrea, 2021. "Born similar, develop apart: Evidence on Chinese hybrid exporters," DICE Discussion Papers 364, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. Piveteau, Paul & Smagghue, Gabriel, 2019. "Estimating firm product quality using trade data," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 217-232.
    15. He, Huanlang & Yu, Zhihao, 2018. "Product quality, incomplete contract and the product cycle," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 160-167.
    16. Ge, Ying & Lai, Huiwen & Zhu, Susan Chun, 2015. "Multinational price premium," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 181-199.
    17. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2016. "Quality, trade, and exchange rate pass-through," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 61-80.
    18. Song, Xueyin & Huang, Xianhai & Qing, Tao, 2021. "Intellectual property rights protection and quality upgrading: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Crinò, Rosario & Ogliari, Laura, 2017. "Financial imperfections, product quality, and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 63-84.
    20. Michael A. Anderson & Martin H. Davies & José E. Signoret & Stephen L. S. Smith, 2019. "Firm Heterogeneity and Export Pricing in India," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(3), pages 985-1004, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    high-tech input; export control; high-quality product;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.