IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt634959x5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Its Projects Should Be Small, Local And Private

Author

Listed:
  • Weissenberger, Stein

Abstract

In this paper, the author contends that in order to produce and capture useful knowledge, early Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) projects should be local, small, and focused on realistic goals. The importance of cooperative networks that support knowledge acquisition and diffusion is stressed. Additionally, the author promotes the usage of private industry, especially to perform tasks for which they are best qualified.

Suggested Citation

  • Weissenberger, Stein, 1998. "Why Its Projects Should Be Small, Local And Private," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt634959x5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt634959x5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/634959x5.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Ayat, Rokaya & Hall, Randolph, 1994. "A Conceptual Approach for Developing and Analyzing Alternate Evolutionary Deployment Strategies for Intelligent Vehicle/Highway Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2c1048tj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Hansen, Mark & Qureshi, Mohammad & Rydewski, Daniel, 1994. "Improving Transit Performance with Advanced Public Transportation System Technologies," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7r462920, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Dahlgren, Joy & Weissenberger, Stein & Hickman, Mark & Lo, Hong, 1996. "Lessons From Case Studies Of Advanced Transportation And Information Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5550v1nr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Hickman, Mark D., 1994. "A Comparable Systems Analysis Of San Francisco's BART: Lessons For Automated Highway Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt27m2s5xr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Wachs, Martin, 1994. "Will Congestion Pricing Ever Be Adopted?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt98r1z5rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Weissenberger, Stein & Dahlgren, Joy & Hickman, Mark & Lo, Hong, 1996. "Research And Testing For Its Deployment And Operation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9tm4v0zx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Hansen, Mark & Qureshi, Mohammad & Rydzewski, Daniel, 1994. "Improving Transit Performance With Advanced Public Transportation System Technologies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt600102zm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Freeman, Chris, 1994. "The Economics of Technical Change," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 18(5), pages 463-514, October.
    9. Rosenberg,Nathan, 1994. "Exploring the Black Box," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521459556.
    10. DeBresson, Chris & Amesse, Fernand, 1991. "Networks of innovators :A review and introduction to the issue," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 363-379, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    2. Gregory F. Nemet, 2006. "How well does Learning-by-doing Explain Cost Reductions in a Carbon-free Energy Technology?," Working Papers 2006.143, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Nemet, Gregory F., 2006. "Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 3218-3232, November.
    4. Cantner, Uwe & Pyka, Andreas, 1998. "Technological evolution -- an analysis within the knowledge-based approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 85-107, March.
    5. Lerda, Juan Carlos, 1996. "Globalización de la economía y pérdida de autonomía de las autoridades fiscales, bancarias y monetarias," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34271, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Riccardo regstdcenzi, 2008. "Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 51-67.
    7. Stefania Vitali & Gabriele Tedeschi & Mauro Gallegati, 2013. "The impact of classes of innovators on technology, financial fragility, and economic growth," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(4), pages 1069-1091, August.
    8. Freeman, Chris, 2002. "Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems--complementarity and economic growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 191-211, February.
    9. Hickman, Mark & Day, Theodore, 1996. "An Information And Institutional Inventory Of California Transit Agencies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5cr225vg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Andreas Pyka & Jens J. Kruger & Uwe Cantner, 2003. "Twin Peaks: What the Knowledge-based Approach Can Say about the Dynamics of the World Income Distribution," Chapters, in: Pier Paolo Saviotti (ed.), Applied Evolutionary Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2014. "Explaining the Slow Pace of Energy Technological Innovation: Why Market Conditions Matter," CCEP Working Papers 1401, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    12. Dessouky, Maged & Singh, Ajay & Hall, Randolph, 1997. "Transit ITS Simulator (TRANSITS): Design Document," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt49k184rv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2006. "R&D, Spillovers, Innovation Systems and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe," Bruges European Economic Research Papers 5, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    14. Dosi, Giovanni & Nelson, Richard R., 2010. "Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 51-127, Elsevier.
    15. Tiziana Di Cimbrini & Fabrizio Maturo & Stefania Migliori & Francesco Paolone, 2018. "Innovation Propensity in the Specialized Suppliers Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 129-148, October.
    16. Fagiolo, Giorgio & Dosi, Giovanni, 2003. "Exploitation, exploration and innovation in a model of endogenous growth with locally interacting agents," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 237-273, September.
    17. Hall, Randolph & Dessouky, Maged & Nowroozi, Ali & Singh, A., 1997. "Evaluation Of ITS Technology For Bus Timed Transfers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1wq2v1p4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    18. Flamm, Bradley, 2001. "Advanced Technologies in Public Transportation," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3m46b19k, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Nemet, Gregory F., 2009. "Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 700-709, June.
    20. Philip Cooke, 2002. "Biotechnology Clusters as Regional, Sectoral Innovation Systems," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 8-37, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt634959x5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.