In a series of recent papers, education economists such as Charles Manski (1992), Dennis Epple and Richard Romano (1998a, 1998b) and Thomas Nechyba (1999) have emphasized the presence of one particular educational spillover in the use of school vouchers – the “peer group” problem. This is an external effect that vouchers may have on the pool of students remaining in the public school system. By allowing low income students of high aptitude and ability to leave the public school system, a voucher system will encourage for-profit private schools to “skim the cream off” the public school system and so depreciate the average quality of students remaining behind. Because the quality of education received by students is in part a function of the average quality of their classmates, the loss of higher ability students reduces the quality of education received by those remaining. Hence a voucher system, it is argued, will promote inequity across students even as it improves the overall efficiency of the educational system.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Carleton University, Department of Economics in its series Carleton Economic Papers with number
00-05.
Length: 34 pages Date of creation: Mar 2000 Date of revision:
Apr 2002 Publication status: Published: "Education Vouchers, Dropouts, and the Peer Group Problem", Southern Economic Journal 68: 4, 774-793. Handle: RePEc:car:carecp:00-05
Contact details of provider: Postal: 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa Ontario, K1S 5B6 Canada Phone: 1-613-520-3744 Fax: 1-613-520-3906
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Deirdre Nelson).