Researchers often rely on self-reported tax data to gauge the effect of taxes on an economic activity. Such data are subject to measurement errors when individuals intentionally misreport their attributes for tax purposes. To the extent that these intentional reporting errors vary with the tax price and after-tax income, which are important regressors in tax price models, estimated elasticities may be biased. We examine the effect of intentional errors-in-variables in tax price models with an application to charitable giving. We employ a random sample of tax returns subject to extensive audits in order to gauge the magnitude of this potential bias. When the theoretically correct measures of the regressors are used the estimated price elasticity of giving is considerably larger, and the income elasticity is somewhat smaller than conventional estimates using self-reported data. We also find evidence of simultaneity between giving and unreported income. Then, we evaluate the efficacy of using a measure of skewness of the distribution of income (third moment) observed in cross-sectional data as an instrument for the mismeasured variant. We find that this instrument performs reasonably well. Based on this finding, we propose a method to diagnose whether the estimates are subject to measurement error bias and a methodology employing Two-Stage Least Squares to obtain unbiased estimates.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
James Andreoni & Brian Erard & Jonathan Feinstein, 1998.
"Tax Compliance,"
Journal of Economic Literature,
American Economic Association, vol. 36(2), pages 818-860, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)