IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2201.02857.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of Toxic Review Content on Overall Product Sentiment

Author

Listed:
  • Mayukh Mukhopadhyay
  • Sangeeta Sahney

Abstract

Toxic contents in online product review are a common phenomenon. A content is perceived to be toxic when it is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable and make individuals leave the discussion. Machine learning algorithms helps the sell side community to identify such toxic patterns and eventually moderate such inputs. Yet, the extant literature provides fewer information about the sentiment of a prospective consumer on the perception of a product after being exposed to such toxic review content. In this study, we collect a balanced data set of review comments from 18 different players segregated into three different sectors from google play-store. Then we calculate the sentence-level sentiment and toxicity score of individual review content. Finally, we use structural equation modelling to quantitatively study the influence of toxic content on overall product sentiment. We observe that comment toxicity negatively influences overall product sentiment but do not exhibit a mediating effect over reviewer score to influence sector-wise relative rating.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayukh Mukhopadhyay & Sangeeta Sahney, 2022. "Effect of Toxic Review Content on Overall Product Sentiment," Papers 2201.02857, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2201.02857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.02857
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudiu Cicea & Carmen Țurlea & Corina Marinescu & Nicolae Pintilie, 2022. "Organizational Culture: A Concept Captive between Determinants and Its Own Power of Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan, 2024. "Thematic Evolution of Blue Tourism: A Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 533-554, April.
    3. Gessler, Michael & Bohlinger, Sandra & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga, 2021. "International vocational education and training research: An introduction to the special issue," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15.
    4. Mira Maria do Rosário & Devile Eugénia Lima & Lima Susana & Moura Andreia, 2023. "What has been said about the reinvention of post-COVID tourism: A bibliometric analysis," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 67-79, December.
    5. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    7. José Carlos Vázquez-Parra & Marco Cruz-Sandoval & Martina Carlos-Arroyo, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship and Complex Thinking: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Johnson Ankrah & Ana Monteiro & Helena Madureira, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Data Sources and Tools for Shoreline Change Analysis and Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Cibele Oliveira Lima & Jarbas Bonetti, 2020. "Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on coastal communities’ social vulnerability to climate change and to the impact of extreme events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 1589-1610, July.
    11. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    12. Ashraf, Rohail & Khan, Muhammad Asif & Khuhro, Rafique Ahmed & Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed, 2022. "Knowledge creation dynamics of technological forecasting and social change special issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & Huyen, Nguyen Thanh Thanh & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Phuong, Luong Anh & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2020. "Mapping the intellectual and conceptual structure of research on gender issues in the family business: A bibliometric review," OSF Preprints jgnrw, Center for Open Science.
    14. Tong Chen & Mo Wang & Jin Su & Jianjun Li, 2023. "Unlocking the Positive Impact of Bio-Swales on Hydrology, Water Quality, and Biodiversity: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Merve Anaç & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Kamil Erdayandi, 2023. "Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    16. Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K & Zhao, Longfeng & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Chien, Chen-Fu & Lev, Benjamin, 2020. "The evolution of Omega-The International Journal of Management Science over the past 40 years: A bibliometric overview," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Valentina Gómez-Domínguez & Diego Navarro-Mateu & Vicente Javier Prado-Gascó & Teresa Gómez-Domínguez, 2022. "How Much Do We Care about Teacher Burnout during the Pandemic: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-24, June.
    19. David N. Matzig & Clemens Schmid & Felix Riede, 2023. "Mapping the field of cultural evolutionary theory and methods in archaeology using bibliometric methods," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2201.02857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.