IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1907.11053.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal make take fees in a multi market maker environment

Author

Listed:
  • Bastien Baldacci
  • Dylan Possamai
  • Mathieu Rosenbaum

Abstract

Following the recent literature on make take fees policies, we consider an exchange wishing to set a suitable contract with several market makers in order to improve trading quality on its platform. To do so, we use a principal-agent approach, where the agents (the market makers) optimise their quotes in a Nash equilibrium fashion, providing best response to the contract proposed by the principal (the exchange). This contract aims at attracting liquidity on the platform. This is because the wealth of the exchange depends on the arrival of market orders, which is driven by the spread of market makers. We compute the optimal contract in quasi explicit form and also derive the optimal spread policies for the market makers. Several new phenomena appears in this multi market maker setting. In particular we show that it is not necessarily optimal to have a large number of market makers in the presence of a contracting scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastien Baldacci & Dylan Possamai & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "Optimal make take fees in a multi market maker environment," Papers 1907.11053, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.11053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.11053
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Gu'eant & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Joaquin Fernandez Tapia, 2011. "Dealing with the Inventory Risk. A solution to the market making problem," Papers 1105.3115, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2012.
    2. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1987. "Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 303-328, March.
    3. Madhavan, Ananth & Richardson, Matthew & Roomans, Mark, 1997. "Why Do Security Prices Change? A Transaction-Level Analysis of NYSE Stocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 1035-1064.
    4. Weibing Huang & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Pamela Saliba, 2019. "From Glosten-Milgrom to the whole limit order book and applications to financial regulation," Papers 1902.10743, arXiv.org.
    5. Ho, Thomas & Stoll, Hans R., 1981. "Optimal dealer pricing under transactions and return uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 47-73, March.
    6. Marco Avellaneda & Sasha Stoikov, 2008. "High-frequency trading in a limit order book," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 217-224.
    7. Glosten, Lawrence R. & Milgrom, Paul R., 1985. "Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 71-100, March.
    8. Matthieu Wyart & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters & Michele Vettorazzo, 2008. "Relation between bid-ask spread, impact and volatility in order-driven markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 41-57.
    9. Yuliy Sannikov, 2008. "A Continuous-Time Version of the Principal-Agent Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(3), pages 957-984.
    10. Othmane Mounjid & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Pamela Saliba, 2019. "From asymptotic properties of general point processes to the ranking of financial agents," Papers 1906.05420, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bastien Baldacci & Philippe Bergault & Dylan Possamai, 2022. "A mean-field game of market-making against strategic traders," Papers 2203.13053, arXiv.org.
    2. Roberto Riccó & Barbara Rindi & Duane J. Seppi, 2021. "Optimal Market Asset Pricing," Working Papers 675, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    3. Emma Hubert, 2023. "Continuous-time incentives in hierarchies," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 605-661, July.
    4. Emma Hubert, 2020. "Continuous-time incentives in hierarchies," Papers 2007.10758, arXiv.org.
    5. Bingyan Han, 2022. "Can maker-taker fees prevent algorithmic cooperation in market making?," Papers 2211.00496, arXiv.org.
    6. Daniel Krv{s}ek & Dylan Possamai, 2023. "Randomisation with moral hazard: a path to existence of optimal contracts," Papers 2311.13278, arXiv.org.
    7. Bastien Baldacci & Iuliia Manziuk & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "Market making and incentives design in the presence of a dark pool: a deep reinforcement learning approach," Papers 1912.01129, arXiv.org.
    8. Bastien Baldacci & Paul Jusselin & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "How to design a derivatives market?," Papers 1909.09257, arXiv.org.
    9. Dylan Possamai & Chiara Rossato, 2023. "Golden parachutes under the threat of accidents," Papers 2312.02101, arXiv.org.
    10. Bingyan Han, 2022. "Cooperation between Independent Market Makers," Papers 2206.05410, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar El Euch & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Nizar Touzi, 2019. "Optimal make-take fees for market making regulation," Working Papers hal-02379592, HAL.
    2. Omar El Euch & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Optimal make-take fees for market making regulation," Papers 1805.02741, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
    3. Christoph Kuhn & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "Optimal Liquidity Provision," Papers 1309.5235, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2015.
    4. Thibault Jaisson, 2015. "Liquidity and Impact in Fair Markets," Papers 1506.02507, arXiv.org.
    5. Qing-Qing Yang & Wai-Ki Ching & Jiawen Gu & Tak-Kuen Siu, 2020. "Trading strategy with stochastic volatility in a limit order book market," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(1), pages 277-301, June.
    6. Kühn, Christoph & Muhle-Karbe, Johannes, 2015. "Optimal liquidity provision," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(7), pages 2493-2515.
    7. Bastien Baldacci & Philippe Bergault & Dylan Possamai, 2022. "A mean-field game of market-making against strategic traders," Papers 2203.13053, arXiv.org.
    8. Philippe Bergault & Olivier Gu'eant, 2023. "Modeling liquidity in corporate bond markets: applications to price adjustments," Papers 2309.04216, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    9. Weibing Huang & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Simulating and Analyzing Order Book Data: The Queue-Reactive Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 107-122, March.
    10. Bastien Baldacci & Jerome Benveniste & Gordon Ritter, 2020. "Optimal trading without optimal control," Papers 2012.12945, arXiv.org.
    11. Weibing Huang & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Pamela Saliba, 2019. "From Glosten-Milgrom to the whole limit order book and applications to financial regulation," Papers 1902.10743, arXiv.org.
    12. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    13. Pankaj Kumar, 2021. "Deep Hawkes Process for High-Frequency Market Making," Papers 2109.15110, arXiv.org.
    14. Nelson Vadori & Leo Ardon & Sumitra Ganesh & Thomas Spooner & Selim Amrouni & Jared Vann & Mengda Xu & Zeyu Zheng & Tucker Balch & Manuela Veloso, 2022. "Towards Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning driven Over-The-Counter Market Simulations," Papers 2210.07184, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    15. Joseph Jerome & Leandro Sanchez-Betancourt & Rahul Savani & Martin Herdegen, 2022. "Model-based gym environments for limit order book trading," Papers 2209.07823, arXiv.org.
    16. Etienne Chevalier & M’hamed Gaïgi & Vathana Ly Vath & Mohamed Mnif, 2017. "Optimal Market Dealing Under Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 313-335, April.
    17. Baron Law & Frederi Viens, 2019. "Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model," Papers 1903.07222, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
    18. Alexander Barzykin & Philippe Bergault & Olivier Gu'eant, 2021. "Algorithmic market making in dealer markets with hedging and market impact," Papers 2106.06974, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    19. Paul Jusselin, 2020. "Optimal market making with persistent order flow," Papers 2003.05958, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    20. Sumitra Ganesh & Nelson Vadori & Mengda Xu & Hua Zheng & Prashant Reddy & Manuela Veloso, 2019. "Reinforcement Learning for Market Making in a Multi-agent Dealer Market," Papers 1911.05892, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.11053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.