IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1909.09257.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to design a derivatives market?

Author

Listed:
  • Bastien Baldacci
  • Paul Jusselin
  • Mathieu Rosenbaum

Abstract

We consider the problem of designing a derivatives exchange aiming at addressing clients needs in terms of listed options and providing suitable liquidity. We proceed into two steps. First we use a quantization method to select the options that should be displayed by the exchange. Then, using a principal-agent approach, we design a make take fees contract between the exchange and the market maker. The role of this contract is to provide incentives to the market maker so that he offers small spreads for the whole range of listed options, hence attracting transactions and meeting the commercial requirements of the exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastien Baldacci & Paul Jusselin & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "How to design a derivatives market?," Papers 1909.09257, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1909.09257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.09257
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhavan, Ananth & Richardson, Matthew & Roomans, Mark, 1997. "Why Do Security Prices Change? A Transaction-Level Analysis of NYSE Stocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 1035-1064.
    2. Paul Jusselin & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "Optimal auction duration: A price formation viewpoint," Papers 1906.01713, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    3. Bastien Baldacci & Dylan Possamai & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "Optimal make take fees in a multi market maker environment," Papers 1907.11053, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    4. Eric Budish & Peter Cramton & John Shim, 2015. "Editor's Choice The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1547-1621.
    5. Matthieu Wyart & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters & Michele Vettorazzo, 2008. "Relation between bid-ask spread, impact and volatility in order-driven markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 41-57.
    6. Stewart Mayhew & Vassil Mihov, 2004. "How Do Exchanges Select Stocks for Option Listing?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 59(1), pages 447-471, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bastien Baldacci & Philippe Bergault, 2021. "Optimal incentives in a limit order book: a SPDE control approach," Papers 2112.00375, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastien Baldacci & Philippe Bergault & Dylan Possamai, 2022. "A mean-field game of market-making against strategic traders," Papers 2203.13053, arXiv.org.
    2. Thibault Jaisson, 2015. "Liquidity and Impact in Fair Markets," Papers 1506.02507, arXiv.org.
    3. Weibing Huang & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Simulating and Analyzing Order Book Data: The Queue-Reactive Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 107-122, March.
    4. Roberto Riccó & Barbara Rindi & Duane J. Seppi, 2021. "Optimal Market Asset Pricing," Working Papers 675, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    5. Weibing Huang & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Pamela Saliba, 2019. "From Glosten-Milgrom to the whole limit order book and applications to financial regulation," Papers 1902.10743, arXiv.org.
    6. Antoine Fosset & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Michael Benzaquen, 2020. "Endogenous Liquidity Crises," Post-Print hal-02567495, HAL.
    7. Carol Osler & Geir Bjonnes & Neophytos Kathitziotis, 2016. "Bid-Ask Spreads in OTC Markets," Working Papers 102, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
    8. Takero Ibuki & Jun-ichi Inoue, 2011. "Response of double-auction markets to instantaneous Selling–Buying signals with stochastic Bid–Ask spread," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 6(2), pages 93-120, November.
    9. Omar El Euch & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Nizar Touzi, 2019. "Optimal make-take fees for market making regulation," Working Papers hal-02379592, HAL.
    10. Bonart, Julius & Lillo, Fabrizio, 2018. "A continuous and efficient fundamental price on the discrete order book grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 698-713.
    11. Rama Cont & Mihai Cucuringu & Chao Zhang, 2021. "Cross-Impact of Order Flow Imbalance in Equity Markets," Papers 2112.13213, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    12. Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Zexin Wang & Kevin Webster, 2023. "A Leland model for delta hedging in central risk books," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 504-547, July.
    13. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2021. "The Inelastic Market Hypothesis: A Microstructural Interpretation," Papers 2108.00242, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    14. Bastien Baldacci & Dylan Possamai & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "Optimal make take fees in a multi market maker environment," Papers 1907.11053, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    15. Antoine Fosset & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Michael Benzaquen, 2020. "Endogenous Liquidity Crises," Working Papers hal-02567495, HAL.
    16. Omar El Euch & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Optimal make-take fees for market making regulation," Papers 1805.02741, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
    17. Weibing Huang & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "How to predict the consequences of a tick value change? Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange pilot program," Papers 1507.07052, arXiv.org.
    18. Suchismita Mishra & Le Zhao, 2021. "Order Routing Decisions for a Fragmented Market: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, November.
    19. Paul Jusselin, 2020. "Optimal market making with persistent order flow," Papers 2003.05958, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    20. Julius Bonart & Fabrizio Lillo, 2016. "A continuous and efficient fundamental price on the discrete order book grid," Papers 1608.00756, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1909.09257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.