IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1004.2548.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth W. Peters
  • Mario V. Wuthrich
  • Pavel V. Shevchenko

Abstract

The intention of this paper is to estimate a Bayesian distribution-free chain ladder (DFCL) model using approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) methodology. We demonstrate how to estimate quantities of interest in claims reserving and compare the estimates to those obtained from classical and credibility approaches. In this context, a novel numerical procedure utilising Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), ABC and a Bayesian bootstrap procedure was developed in a truly distribution-free setting. The ABC methodology arises because we work in a distribution-free setting in which we make no parametric assumptions, meaning we can not evaluate the likelihood point-wise or in this case simulate directly from the likelihood model. The use of a bootstrap procedure allows us to generate samples from the intractable likelihood without the requirement of distributional assumptions, this is crucial to the ABC framework. The developed methodology is used to obtain the empirical distribution of the DFCL model parameters and the predictive distribution of the outstanding loss liabilities conditional on the observed claims. We then estimate predictive Bayesian capital estimates, the Value at Risk (VaR) and the mean square error of prediction (MSEP). The latter is compared with the classical bootstrap and credibility methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth W. Peters & Mario V. Wuthrich & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2010. "Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap," Papers 1004.2548, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1004.2548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.2548
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Del Moral & Arnaud Doucet & Ajay Jasra, 2006. "Sequential Monte Carlo samplers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 411-436, June.
    2. Greg Taylor & Gráinne McGuire, 2007. "A Synchronous Bootstrap to Account for Dependencies Between Lines of Business in the Estimation of Loss Reserve Prediction Error," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 70-88.
    3. Mack, Thomas, 1993. "Distribution-free Calculation of the Standard Error of Chain Ladder Reserve Estimates," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 213-225, November.
    4. John Geweke, 1991. "Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments," Staff Report 148, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    5. Paulo J. R. Pinheiro & João Manuel Andrade e Silva & Maria De Lourdes Centeno, 2003. "Bootstrap Methodology in Claim Reserving," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 701-714, December.
    6. Gisler, Alois & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2008. "Credibility for the Chain Ladder Reserving Method," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 565-600, November.
    7. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    8. England, Peter & Verrall, Richard, 1999. "Analytic and bootstrap estimates of prediction errors in claims reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 281-293, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heberle, Jochen & Thomas, Anne, 2014. "Combining chain-ladder claims reserving with fuzzy numbers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 96-104.
    2. Alessandro Ricotta & Edoardo Luini, 2019. "Bayesian Estimation of Structure Variables in the Collective Risk Model for Reserve Risk," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-2.
    3. Kylie-Anne Richards & Gareth W. Peters & William Dunsmuir, 2012. "Heavy-Tailed Features and Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book Volume Profiles in Futures Markets," Papers 1210.7215, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2015.
    4. Pierre-Olivier Goffard & Patrick Laub, 2021. "Approximate Bayesian Computations to fit and compare insurance loss models," Post-Print hal-02891046, HAL.
    5. Karthik Sriram & Peng Shi, 2021. "Stochastic loss reserving: A new perspective from a Dirichlet model," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 195-230, March.
    6. Man Chung Fung & Gareth W. Peters & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2016. "A unified approach to mortality modelling using state-space framework: characterisation, identification, estimation and forecasting," Papers 1605.09484, arXiv.org.
    7. Peters, Gareth W. & Dong, Alice X.D. & Kohn, Robert, 2014. "A copula based Bayesian approach for paid–incurred claims models for non-life insurance reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 258-278.
    8. Pierre-Olivier Goffard & Patrick Laub, 2021. "Approximate Bayesian Computations to fit and compare insurance loss models," Working Papers hal-02891046, HAL.
    9. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2012. "Bayesian Model Choice of Grouped t-Copula," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1097-1119, December.
    10. Thomas A. Dean & Sumeetpal S. Singh & Ajay Jasra & Gareth W. Peters, 2014. "Parameter Estimation for Hidden Markov Models with Intractable Likelihoods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 970-987, December.
    11. Goffard, Pierre-Olivier & Laub, Patrick J., 2021. "Approximate Bayesian Computations to fit and compare insurance loss models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 350-371.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peters, Gareth W. & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Shevchenko, Pavel V., 2010. "Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 36-51, August.
    2. László Martinek, 2019. "Analysis of Stochastic Reserving Models By Means of NAIC Claims Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Klaus Schmidt, 2012. "Loss prediction based on run-off triangles," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(2), pages 265-310, June.
    4. Gian Paolo Clemente & Nino Savelli & Diego Zappa, 2019. "Modelling Outstanding Claims with Mixed Compound Processes in Insurance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 123-138, March.
    5. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Karthik Sriram & Peng Shi, 2021. "Stochastic loss reserving: A new perspective from a Dirichlet model," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 195-230, March.
    7. Verdonck, T. & Debruyne, M., 2011. "The influence of individual claims on the chain-ladder estimates: Analysis and diagnostic tool," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 85-98, January.
    8. Verrall, R.J. & England, P.D., 2005. "Incorporating expert opinion into a stochastic model for the chain-ladder technique," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 355-370, October.
    9. Wahl, Felix & Lindholm, Mathias & Verrall, Richard, 2019. "The collective reserving model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 34-50.
    10. Pitselis, Georgios & Grigoriadou, Vasiliki & Badounas, Ioannis, 2015. "Robust loss reserving in a log-linear model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 14-27.
    11. Taylor, Greg, 2021. "A special Tweedie sub-family with application to loss reserving prediction error," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 262-288.
    12. Fröhlich, Andreas & Weng, Annegret, 2018. "Parameter uncertainty and reserve risk under Solvency II," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 130-141.
    13. Eduardo Ramos-P'erez & Pablo J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & Jos'e Javier N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Stochastic reserving with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2008.07564, arXiv.org.
    14. Jonas Harnau, 2018. "Log-Normal or Over-Dispersed Poisson?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-37, July.
    15. Boratyńska, Agata, 2017. "Robust Bayesian estimation and prediction of reserves in exponential model with quadratic variance function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 135-140.
    16. Jonas Harnau, 2018. "Misspecification Tests for Log-Normal and Over-Dispersed Poisson Chain-Ladder Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Karina Ostoj, 2018. "Analysis of the IBNR reserve credibility predictors," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 51, pages 187-206.
    18. Han, Zhongxian & Gau, Wu-Chyuan, 2008. "Estimation of loss reserves with lognormal development factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 389-395, February.
    19. de Alba, Enrique & Nieto-Barajas, Luis E., 2008. "Claims reserving: A correlated Bayesian model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 368-376, December.
    20. Peters, Gareth W. & Targino, Rodrigo S. & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2017. "Full Bayesian analysis of claims reserving uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-53.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1004.2548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.