IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2018014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

I like, therefore I am. Predictive modeling to gain insights in political preference in a multi-party system

Author

Listed:
  • PRAET, Stiene
  • VAN AELST, Peter
  • MARTENS, David

Abstract

In political sciences there is a long tradition of trying to understand party preferences and voting behavior to explain political decisions. Traditionally, scholars relied on voting histories, religious affiliation, and socio-economic status to understand people’s vote. Today, thanks to the Internet and social media, an unseen amount and granularity of data is available. In this paper we show how political insights can be gained from high-dimensional and sparse Facebook data, by building and interpreting predictive models based on Facebook ‘like’ and survey data of more than 6.500 Flemish participants. First, we built several logistic regression models to show that it is possible to predict political leaning and party preference based on Facebook likes in a multi-party system, even when excluding the political Facebook likes. Secondly, by introducing several metrics that measure the association between Facebook likes and a certain political affiliation, we can describe voter profiles in terms of common interests. For example, left voters often like environmental organizations and alternative rock music, whereas right voters like Flemish nationalistic content and techno music. Lastly, we develop a method to measure ideological homogeneity, or to what extent do people that like the same products, movies, books, etc. have a similar political ideology. In the Flemish setting, the categories ‘politics’ and ‘civil society’ are most ideologically homogeneous whereas ‘TV shows’ and ‘sports’ are the most heterogeneous. The results show that our approach has the potential to help political scientists to gain insights into voter profiles and ideological homogeneity using Facebook likes.

Suggested Citation

  • PRAET, Stiene & VAN AELST, Peter & MARTENS, David, 2018. "I like, therefore I am. Predictive modeling to gain insights in political preference in a multi-party system," Working Papers 2018014, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2018014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/e7ffcf/155787.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster Provost & David Martens & Alan Murray, 2015. "Finding Similar Mobile Consumers with a Privacy-Friendly Geosocial Design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 243-265, June.
    2. DE CNUDDE, Sofie & MARTENS, David & EVGENIOU, Theodoros & PROVOST, Foster, 2017. "A benchmarking study of classification techniques for behavioral data," Working Papers 2017005, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    3. McNicholas, P.D. & Murphy, T.B. & O'Regan, M., 2008. "Standardising the lift of an association rule," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4712-4721, June.
    4. Jakob Bæk Kristensen & Thomas Albrechtsen & Emil Dahl-Nielsen & Michael Jensen & Magnus Skovrind & Tobias Bornakke, 2017. "Parsimonious data: How a single Facebook like predicts voting behavior in multiparty systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cerina, Roberto & Duch, Raymond, 2020. "Measuring public opinion via digital footprints," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 987-1002.
    2. Chang-Yi Kao & Hao-En Chueh, 2022. "A Real-Time Bidding Gamification Service of Retailer Digital Transformation," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    3. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Koen de Bock, 2020. "Leveraging fine-grained transaction data for customer life event predictions," Post-Print hal-02507998, HAL.
    4. TOBBACK, Ellen & MARTENS, David, 2017. "Retail credit scoring using fine-grained payment data," Working Papers 2017011, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Mathias Eggert & Jens Alberts, 2020. "Frontiers of business intelligence and analytics 3.0: a taxonomy-based literature review and research agenda," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 685-739, July.
    6. Hana Choi & Carl F. Mela & Santiago R. Balseiro & Adam Leary, 2020. "Online Display Advertising Markets: A Literature Review and Future Directions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 556-575, June.
    7. Siliang Tong & Xueming Luo & Bo Xu, 2020. "Personalized mobile marketing strategies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 64-78, January.
    8. Franziska Marquart & Jakob Ohme & Judith Möller, 2020. "Following Politicians on Social Media: Effects for Political Information, Peer Communication, and Youth Engagement," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 197-207.
    9. DE CNUDDE, Sofie & MARTENS, David & PROVOST, Foster, 2018. "An exploratory study towards applying and demystifying deep learning classification on behavioral big data," Working Papers 2018002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    10. MOEYERSOMS, Julie & D'ALESSANDRO, Brian & PROVOST, Foster & MARTENS, David, 2017. "Attributing value in a data pooling setting for predictive modeling," Working Papers 2017009, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    11. Guo, Xin & Wang, David Z.W. & Wu, Jianjun & Sun, Huijun & Zhou, Li, 2020. "Mining commuting behavior of urban rail transit network by using association rules," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    12. Jia Feng & Xiao-min Mu & Ling-ling Ma & Wei Wang, 2020. "Comorbidity Patterns of Older Lung Cancer Patients in Northeast China: An Association Rules Analysis Based on Electronic Medical Records," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2018014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.