IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2018002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An exploratory study towards applying and demystifying deep learning classification on behavioral big data

Author

Listed:
  • DE CNUDDE, Sofie
  • MARTENS, David
  • PROVOST, Foster

Abstract

The superior performance of deep learning algorithms in fields such as computer vision and natural language processing has fueled an increased interest towards these algorithms in both research and in practice. Ever since, many studies have applied these algorithms to other machine learning contexts with other types of data in the hope of achieving comparable superior performance. This study departs from the latter motivation and investigates the application of deep learning classification techniques on big behavioral data while comparing its predictive performance with 11 widely-used shallow classifiers. In addition to the application on a new type of data and a structured comparison of its performance with commonlyused classifiers, this study attempts to shed light onto when and why deep learning techniques perform better. Regarding the specific characteristics of applying deep learning on this unique class of data, we demonstrate that an unsupervised pretraining step does not improve classification performance and that a tanh nonlinearity achieves the best predictive performance. The results from applying deep learning on 15 big behavioral data sets demonstrate as good as or better results compared to traditionally-used, shallow classifiers. However, no significant performance improvement can be recorded. Investigating when deep learning performs better, we find that worse performance is obtained for data sets with low signal-from-noise separability. In order to gain insight into why deep learning generally performs well on this type of data, we investigate the value of the distributed, hierarchical characteristic of the learning process. The neurons in the distributed representation seem to identify more nuances in the many behavioral features as compared to shallow classifiers. We demonstrate these nuances in an intuitive manner and validate them through comparison with feature engineering techniques. This is the first study to apply and validate the use of nonlinear deep learning classification on fine-grained, human-generated data while proposing efficient con guration settings for its practical implementation. As deep learning classification is often characterized by being a black-box approach, we also provide a first attempt towards the disentanglement regarding when and why these techniques perform well.

Suggested Citation

  • DE CNUDDE, Sofie & MARTENS, David & PROVOST, Foster, 2018. "An exploratory study towards applying and demystifying deep learning classification on behavioral big data," Working Papers 2018002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2018002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/df823a/147949.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DE CNUDDE, Sofie & MARTENS, David & EVGENIOU, Theodoros & PROVOST, Foster, 2017. "A benchmarking study of classification techniques for behavioral data," Working Papers 2017005, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Martens, David & Baesens, Bart & Van Gestel, Tony & Vanthienen, Jan, 2007. "Comprehensible credit scoring models using rule extraction from support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1466-1476, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DE CNUDDE, Sofie & MOEYERSOMS, Julie & STANKOVA, Marija & TOBBACK, Ellen & JAVALY, Vinayak & MARTENS, David, 2015. "Who cares about your Facebook friends? Credit scoring for microfinance," Working Papers 2015018, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Derhami, Shahab & Smith, Alice E., 2017. "An integer programming approach for fuzzy rule-based classification systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 924-934.
    3. Dimitris Andriosopoulos & Michalis Doumpos & Panos M. Pardalos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2019. "Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1599, October.
    4. TOBBACK, Ellen & MARTENS, David & VAN GESTEL, Tony & BAESENS, Bart, 2012. "Forecasting loss given default models: Impact of account characteristics and the macroeconomic state," Working Papers 2012019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Li, Yibei & Wang, Ximei & Djehiche, Boualem & Hu, Xiaoming, 2020. "Credit scoring by incorporating dynamic networked information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1103-1112.
    6. Loterman, Gert & Brown, Iain & Martens, David & Mues, Christophe & Baesens, Bart, 2012. "Benchmarking regression algorithms for loss given default modeling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 161-170.
    7. STANKOVA, Marija & MARTENS, David & PROVOST, Foster, 2015. "Classification over bipartite graphs through projection," Working Papers 2015001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    8. PRAET, Stiene & VAN AELST, Peter & MARTENS, David, 2018. "I like, therefore I am. Predictive modeling to gain insights in political preference in a multi-party system," Working Papers 2018014, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    9. Jian Shi & Benlian Xu, 2016. "Credit Scoring by Fuzzy Support Vector Machines with a Novel Membership Function," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, November.
    10. Zhang, Zhiwang & Gao, Guangxia & Shi, Yong, 2014. "Credit risk evaluation using multi-criteria optimization classifier with kernel, fuzzification and penalty factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 335-348.
    11. Emilio Carrizosa & Cristina Molero-Río & Dolores Romero Morales, 2021. "Mathematical optimization in classification and regression trees," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 5-33, April.
    12. Yu, Lean & Wang, Shouyang & Lai, Kin Keung, 2009. "An intelligent-agent-based fuzzy group decision making model for financial multicriteria decision support: The case of credit scoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 942-959, June.
    13. De Caigny, Arno & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W., 2018. "A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 760-772.
    14. Hassanniakalager, Arman & Sermpinis, Georgios & Stasinakis, Charalampos & Verousis, Thanos, 2020. "A conditional fuzzy inference approach in forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 196-216.
    15. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    16. Berkin, Anil & Aerts, Walter & Van Caneghem, Tom, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of machine learning for performance-related attributional statements," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    17. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Koen de Bock, 2020. "Leveraging fine-grained transaction data for customer life event predictions," Post-Print hal-02507998, HAL.
    18. Qifeng Qiao & Peter A. Beling, 2016. "Decision analytics and machine learning in economic and financial systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 109-113, June.
    19. Blanquero, Rafael & Carrizosa, Emilio & Molero-Río, Cristina & Romero Morales, Dolores, 2020. "Sparsity in optimal randomized classification trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 255-272.
    20. Moro Russ A. & Härdle Wolfgang K. & Schäfer Dorothea, 2017. "Company rating with support vector machines," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 34(1-2), pages 55-67, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2018002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.