IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aly/journl/202201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A study on the balanced scorecard implementation of the SDIF

Author

Listed:
  • Nizamulmulk Gunes

    (Assoc. Prof.,Department of Audit, Savings Deposit Insurance Fund, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Erdinc Percemli

    (Department of Audit, Savings Deposit Insurance Fund, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

There are several management methods and tools transferred from private sector to public sector in order to attain efficiency and effectiveness with the movement of New Public Management. One of those methods is the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). While the BSC is highly recommended to both private and public organizations, it must be acknowledged that public organizations have a completely different structure and nature in some respects. Furthermore, developed countries’ organizations could not have the same traits as developing countries’ organizations do. This is an empirical case study which aims to investigate and analyze the experience of the BSC implementation in Savings Deposit Insurance Fund (SDIF) -a kind of Financial Regulatory Organization (FRO)- from Turkey within focal points of applicability, success criteria, challenges, and benefits. In order to achieve this objective, qualitative research method was applied by analyzing organization’s data and conducting interviews. This research concludes that the BSC concept has some unclear points both theoretically and practically. Also, it is not an easy and straightforward system to implement. On the other hand, it can be assessed as a beneficial tool for public organizations, particularly in developing countries, to get the habit of setting objectives, making plans to reach those objectives, measuring performance against those plans and reviewing.

Suggested Citation

  • Nizamulmulk Gunes & Erdinc Percemli, "undated". "A study on the balanced scorecard implementation of the SDIF," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202201, Reviewsep.
    • Handle: RePEc:aly:journl:202201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/1_NIZAM.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/?page_id=1664
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas John Wake, 2015. "The use of the balanced scorecard to measure knowledge work," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(4), pages 590-602, April.
    2. Véronique Malleret & Annick Bourguignon & Hanne Norreklit, 2004. "The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord : the ideological dimension," Post-Print hal-00486648, HAL.
    3. Norreklit, Hanne, 2003. "The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 591-619, August.
    4. Claudine Umashev & Roger Willett, 2008. "Challenges to Implementing Strategic Performance Measurement Systems in Multi‐Objective Organizations: The Case of a Large Local Government Authority," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(4), pages 377-398, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Andon & Jane Baxter & Habib Mahama, 2005. "The Balanced Scorecard: Slogans, Seduction, and State of Play," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 29-38, March.
    2. Andreas Beck & Jurgen Reck & Patrick Siegfried, 2022. "Development of a Performance Measurement Systems for NCA-Sales-Teams," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 65-87, March.
    3. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Walid Cheffi & Adel Beldi, 2007. "Conception D'Un Outil De Mesure De La Performance : Divergences Entre Controleurs De Gestion Et Managers. Cas D'Un Groupe Industriel Français," Post-Print halshs-00543093, HAL.
    5. Bourguignon, Annick & Saulpic, Olivier & Zarlowski, Philippe, 2006. "Management Accounting Change in the Public Sector: A French Case Study and a New Institutionalist Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers DR 06018, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    6. Hofmann, Thorsten, 2011. "Balanced Scorecard: Theoretische Konzeption und Anwendung in der Praxis," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 4/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.
    7. Urquía-Grande, Elena & Lorain, Marie-Anne & Rautiainen, Antti Ilmari & Cano-Montero, Elisa Isabel, 2021. "Balance with logic-measuring the performance and sustainable development efforts of an NPO in rural Ethiopia," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard: Fashion or Virus?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    9. Lucia Clara Banchieri & Fernando Campa Planas & Maria Victoria Sanchez Rebull, 2011. "What has been said, and what remains to be said, about the balanced scorecard?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 29(1), pages 155-192.
    10. Mandy M. Cheng & Peter F. Luckett & Habib Mahama, 2007. "Effect of perceived conflict among multiple performance goals and goal difficulty on task performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(2), pages 221-242, June.
    11. Charles Daussy, 2013. "Can Social Responsibility Paradoxically Strengthen The Importance Of Finance?," Post-Print hal-01002375, HAL.
    12. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.
    13. Benjamin Dreveton & Sébastien Rocher, 2009. "The success story of a ‘successful?' management device," Post-Print halshs-00479810, HAL.
    14. Glykas, Michael, 2012. "Performance measurement scenarios with fuzzy cognitive strategic maps," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 182-195.
    15. Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo Nogueira & Magalhães Filho, Paulo & Balestieri, José Antônio Perrella, 2015. "Performance measurement and indicators for water supply management: Review and international cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Marek Barowicz, 2022. "Zrównoważona karta wyników w procesie kryzysowego zarządzania bankiem w dobie pandemii COVID-19," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(1), pages 107-148.
    17. Jitender Kumar & Neha Prince & H. Kent Baker, 2022. "Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Issues," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 147-161, June.
    18. Wiersma, Eelke, 2008. "An exploratory study of relative and incremental information content of two non-financial performance measures: Field study evidence on absence frequency and on-time delivery," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 249-265.
    19. Nissen, Mark E., 2019. "Initiating a system for visualizing and measuring dynamic knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 169-181.
    20. E Tapinos & R G Dyson & M Meadows, 2011. "Does the Balanced Scorecard make a difference to the strategy development process?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(5), pages 888-899, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    : balanced scorecard; strategic performance management; strategy map.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • L38 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aly:journl:202201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veysel KAYA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.