IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aly/journl/201832.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fiscal Structure, Human Capital And Innovation In China: Pattern And Regional Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Shunwei Du

    (Wuhan Foreign Language School, Hubei, Wuhan, 430022)

  • Junbo He

    (Beijing Haidian Foreign Language Experiment School, Beijing, P.R.China, 100195)

  • Yufei Kang

    (Xian Gaoxin No.1 High School, Shannxi, Xian, 710075)

Abstract

This paper investigates the primary factors that determine the regional innovation of China, a key engine related to the economy growth. We try to understand whether and to what extent fiscal structure and human capital stock helps to stimulate the innovation behavior. By employ provincial panel data from 2007 to 2016, we find that government expenditure structure is essentially important to boost local innovation behavior, more specifically, we find that government expenditure on technology and education is significantly associated with innovation, every unit increase in the government expenditure on technology and research is associated with 0.41 unit increase in innovation. We also find that human capital plays an important role in determining local innovation, these results are robust after considering other factors such as economy growth, industry structure etc. We then explore regional heterogeneity of this relationship, we divide our sample into western, middle and eastern region according to geographic location, the regression results show that that the relationship between fiscal structure (human capital) and innovation is different across regions, more specifically, government expenditure on technology is more promising and significant in eastern areas, less significant in other two areas, which means public finance is more efficient in eastern areas to support innovation behavior. Our research has provided solid empirical evidence that helps us to understand local governments role to promote regional innovation, in areas that are less developed, a proactive fiscal policy maybe very efficient to promote innovation, while in well developed areas, fiscal policies are less efficient than human-capital-boosting policies in promoting regional innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shunwei Du & Junbo He & Yufei Kang, "undated". "Fiscal Structure, Human Capital And Innovation In China: Pattern And Regional Heterogeneity," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 201832, Reviewsep.
  • Handle: RePEc:aly:journl:201832
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/13_SHUNWEI-DU-Arranged.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/?page_id=430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agrawal, Ajay & Cockburn, Iain & Galasso, Alberto & Oettl, Alexander, 2014. "Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 149-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China:," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    3. Alberto Galasso & Hong Luo, 2018. "Punishing Robots: Issues in the Economics of Tort Liability and Innovation in Artificial Intelligence," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 493-504, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    5. Chattergoon, B. & Kerr, W.R., 2022. "Winner takes all? Tech clusters, population centers, and the spatial transformation of U.S. invention," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    6. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    7. Sarah Armitage & Noël Bakhtian & Adam B. Jaffe, 2023. "Innovation Market Failures and the Design of New Climate Policy Instruments," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 5, pages 4-48, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Nattanicha Chairassamee & Oudom Hean & Parker Jabas, 2023. "The Financial Impact of State Tax Regimes on Local Economies in the U.S," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-10, September.
    9. Stephanie Cheng & Pengkai Lin & Yinliang Tan & Yuchen Zhang, 2023. "“High” innovators? Marijuana legalization and regional innovation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 685-703, March.
    10. Bergé, Laurent & Carayol, Nicolas & Roux, Pascale, 2018. "How do inventor networks affect urban invention?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 137-162.
    11. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Nathan, Max & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2016. "Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 177-194.
    12. Livanis, Grigorios & Lamin, Anna, 2016. "Knowledge, Proximity and R&D Exodus," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 8-26.
    13. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste, Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wachstum. Teilprojekt 1: Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung – Welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert das Wach," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58342, February.
    14. William R. Kerr & Frederic Robert-Nicoud, 2020. "Tech Clusters," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 50-76, Summer.
    15. Thomas J. Hannigan & Alessandra Perri & Vittoria Giada Scalera, 2016. "The Dispersed Multinational: Does Connectedness Across Spatial Dimensions Lead to Broader Technological Search?," Working Papers 11, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    16. Fredrik Niclas Piro, 2019. "The R&D composition of European countries: concentrated versus dispersed profiles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1095-1119, May.
    17. Jiao, Hao & Wang, Tang & Yang, Jifeng, 2022. "Team structure and invention impact under high knowledge diversity: An empirical examination of computer workstation industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Charlotte Senftleben-Koenig & Hanna Wielandt, 2014. "Spatial Wage Inequality and Technological Change," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2014-038, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    19. Tang, Chenghui & Guan, Mingming & Dou, Jianmin, 2021. "Understanding the impact of High Speed Railway on urban innovation performance from the perspective of agglomeration externalities and network externalities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Chan-Yuan Wong & Jeffrey Sheu & Keun Lee, 2023. "Assessing the quest of SMEs in pivoting for new technological ventures: comparing the patenting indexes of seven developed cities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 4029-4064, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional Innovation; Fiscal Structure; Technology Expenditure; Educational Expenditure; Human Capital;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • J40 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aly:journl:201832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veysel KAYA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.