IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v128y2023i7d10.1007_s11192-023-04729-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the quest of SMEs in pivoting for new technological ventures: comparing the patenting indexes of seven developed cities

Author

Listed:
  • Chan-Yuan Wong

    (National Tsing Hua University
    University of Johannesburg)

  • Jeffrey Sheu

    (National Tsing Hua University)

  • Keun Lee

    (Seoul National University
    CIFAR
    Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge of the National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The role of science and patenting is often viewed as the focus of SMEs in post catch-up conditions, as they seek to pivot from performing low value-added activities to new technological ventures in searching for new niches. SMEs—particularly those in city areas—are incentivized to commit to research that is linked to scientific knowledge and patenting activities. This study is interested to explore whether these SMEs upgrade, file patents and commit to long term upgrading. Their performances are benchmarked to SMEs of San Jose—the largest city in Silicon Valley (the highly cited Marshallian industrial cluster). We have configured an extraction process for bulk patenting data and architected a sorting procedure to derive a list of relevant indexes from patents assigned to the bottom 40 (and 60) percent of the total assignees of a region. We discovered that SMEs in Taipei, Seoul, Singapore, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong and Dublin had indeed upgraded to adopt emerging (science-based) technologies and appropriate them—not only to supply for existing market needs, but also to build their competitive edge for future endeavours. While many cities are found to be relatively ahead in producing technologies that are classified as long cycle and science-based, Taipei saw a rising number of SMEs committed to science amid the majority which invested in non-science technologies. Taipei nonetheless stands out as the city which bears many characteristics of what a Marshallian cluster is like. This study sheds new light on the technological pursuit of SMEs in post catch-up conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan-Yuan Wong & Jeffrey Sheu & Keun Lee, 2023. "Assessing the quest of SMEs in pivoting for new technological ventures: comparing the patenting indexes of seven developed cities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 4029-4064, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04729-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04729-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-023-04729-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-023-04729-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho-Don Yan, 2008. "Taiwan's Yacht Industry: A Tale of Two Entrepreneurial Firms," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 469-486.
    2. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    3. Jyh-Wen Shiu & Chan-Yuan Wong & Mei-Chih Hu, 2014. "The dynamic effect of knowledge capitals in the public research institute: insights from patenting analysis of ITRI (Taiwan) and ETRI (Korea)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2051-2068, March.
    4. Schmoch, Ulrich, 2007. "Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1000-1015, September.
    5. Schmoch, Ulrich, 2009. "Patent analyses in the changed legal regime of the US Patent Law since 2001," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 299-303, December.
    6. Chu, Wan-wen, 2009. "Can Taiwan's second movers upgrade via branding?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 1054-1065, July.
    7. Bjørn Asheim & Ron Boschma & Philip Cooke, 2011. "Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 893-904.
    8. Sam Tavassoli & Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol, 2016. "Survival of entrepreneurial firms: the role of agglomeration externalities," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9-10), pages 746-767, October.
    9. Jenn Hwan Wang & Ching-jung Tsai, 2010. "National Model of Technological Catching Up and Innovation: Comparing Patents of Taiwan and South Korea," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(8), pages 1404-1423.
    10. Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2006. "Innovating for Global Competition: Singapore’s Pathway to High-Tech Development," Chapters, in: Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Patarapong Intarakumnerd & Jan Vang (ed.), Asia’s Innovation Systems in Transition, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Ann Markusen, 2003. "Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 701-717.
    12. Wonkyu Shin & Keun Lee & Walter G. Park, 2016. "When an Importer's Protection of IPR Interacts with an Exporter's Level of Technology: Comparing the Impacts on the Exports of the North and South," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 772-802, June.
    13. Sergio Mariotti & Lucia Piscitello, 2001. "Localized capabilities and the internationalization of manufacturing activities by SMEs," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 65-80, January.
    14. Agrawal, Ajay & Cockburn, Iain & Galasso, Alberto & Oettl, Alexander, 2014. "Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 149-165.
    15. Strange, William & Hejazi, Walid & Tang, Jianmin, 2006. "The uncertain city: Competitive instability, skills, innovation and the strategy of agglomeration," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 331-351, May.
    16. Ron Boschma & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Dieter Franz Kogler, 2015. "Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(1), pages 223-250.
    17. Chan-Yuan Wong & Boon-Kwee Ng & Suzana Ariff Azizan & Maisarah Hasbullah, 2018. "Knowledge Structures of City Innovation Systems: Singapore and Hong Kong," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 47-73, January.
    18. Jyh-Wen Shiu & Chan-Yuan Wong & Mei-Chih Hu, 2014. "Erratum to: The dynamic effect of knowledge capitals in the public research institute: insights from patenting analysis of ITRI (Taiwan) and ETRI (Korea)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 605-605, August.
    19. Diane Coyle & David Nguyen, 2022. "No plant, no problem? Factoryless manufacturing, economic measurement and national manufacturing policies," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 23-43, January.
    20. Erik Baark & Naubahar Sharif, 2006. "Hong Kong’s Innovation System in Transition: Challenges of Regional Integration and Promotion of High Technology," Chapters, in: Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Patarapong Intarakumnerd & Jan Vang (ed.), Asia’s Innovation Systems in Transition, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Kenney, Martin & Breznitz, Dan & Murphree, Michael, 2013. "Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 391-407.
    22. Marco Bettiol & Valentina De Marchi & Eleonora Di Maria, 2016. "Developing capabilities in new ventures: a knowledge management approach," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 186-194, May.
    23. Sohn, Dong-Won & Kenney, Martin, 2007. "Universities, Clusters, and Innovation Systems: The Case of Seoul, Korea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 991-1004, June.
    24. Åsa Lindholm-Dahlstrand & Martin Andersson & Bo Carlsson, 2019. "Entrepreneurial experimentation: a key function in systems of innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 591-610, October.
    25. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    26. Ann Markusen, 1996. "Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 293-313, July.
    27. Hobday, Mike, 1995. "East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 1171-1193, July.
    28. G. Avnimelech & M. Teubal, 2008. "From Direct Support Of Business Sector R&D/Innovation To Targeting Venture Capital/Private Equity: A Catching-Up Innovation And Technology Policy Life Cycle Perspective," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1-2), pages 153-172.
    29. Chuan-Kai Lee & Annalee Saxenian, 2008. "Coevolution and coordination: a systemic analysis of the Taiwanese information technology industry," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 157-180, March.
    30. Mahmood, Ishtiaq P. & Singh, Jasjit, 2003. "Technological dynamism in Asia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1031-1054, June.
    31. Diana Heger & Alexandra K. Zaby, 2018. "Patent breadth as effective barrier to market entry," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 174-188, February.
    32. Paula Clancy & Eoin O'Malley & Larry O'Connell & Chris Van Egeraat, 2001. "Industry Clusters in Ireland: An Application of Porter's Model of National Competitive Advantage to Three Sectors," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 7-28.
    33. M. Presutti & V. Odorici, 2019. "Linking entrepreneurial and market orientation to the SME’s performance growth: the moderating role of entrepreneurial experience and networks," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 697-720, September.
    34. Doh, Soogwan & Kim, Byungkyu, 2014. "Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1557-1569.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan-Yuan Wong & Keun Lee, 2022. "Evolution of innovation systems of two industrial districts in East Asia: transformation and upgrade from a peripheral system and the role of the core firms, Samsung and TSMC," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 955-990, July.
    2. William R. Kerr & Frederic Robert-Nicoud, 2020. "Tech Clusters," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 50-76, Summer.
    3. Thomas J. Hannigan & Alessandra Perri & Vittoria Giada Scalera, 2016. "The Dispersed Multinational: Does Connectedness Across Spatial Dimensions Lead to Broader Technological Search?," Working Papers 11, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    4. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    5. Sarah Armitage & Noël Bakhtian & Adam B. Jaffe, 2023. "Innovation Market Failures and the Design of New Climate Policy Instruments," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 5, pages 4-48, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Haifeng Qian, 2018. "Knowledge-Based Regional Economic Development: A Synthetic Review of Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship, and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(2), pages 163-176, May.
    7. Mewes, Lars & Broekel, Tom, 2022. "Technological complexity and economic growth of regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    8. Chan-Yuan Wong, 2016. "Evolutionary targeting for inclusive development," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 291-316, May.
    9. Ron Boschma & Víctor Martín & Asier Minondo, 2017. "Neighbour regions as the source of new industries," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 227-245, June.
    10. Hsini Huang, 2020. "The effect of the small-firm dominated ecology on regional innovation," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(3), pages 703-725, December.
    11. Bernd Wurth & Erik Stam & Ben Spigel, 2022. "Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 729-778, May.
    12. Chan-Yuan Wong & Kim-Leng Goh, 2012. "The pathway of development: science and technology of NIEs and selected Asian emerging economies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 523-548, September.
    13. Ross Brown & Colin Mason, 2017. "Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 11-30, June.
    14. Nukhet Harmancioglu & Gerard J Tellis, 2018. "Silicon envy: How global innovation clusters hurt or stimulate each other across developed and emerging markets," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(7), pages 902-918, September.
    15. Sara Cruz & Aurora Teixeira, 2010. "The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies-Regional Science Debate," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1263-1288.
    16. Pintar, Nico & Scherngell, Thomas, 2022. "The complex nature of regional knowledge production: Evidence on European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    17. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    18. Matthijs J. Janssen, 2015. "Cross-specialization: A New Perspective on Industry Policy," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1519, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2015.
    19. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China:," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04729-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.