IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278877.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Value Of Consumer Information: A Selected, Annotated Bibliography

Author

Listed:
  • Pope, Rulon D.

Abstract

This annotated bibliography contains references on the economic value of information. The citations are listed under three topic areas: Consumer Surplus and Welfare Theory, Stabilization and Economic Welfare, and Information and Efficiency. With a few exceptions, books and lengthy reports are not annotated. Also not annotated is some literature which is superceded or judged ancillary to these topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Pope, Rulon D., 1984. "The Economic Value Of Consumer Information: A Selected, Annotated Bibliography," Staff Reports 278877, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278877
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278877/files/ages840312.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacquelene M. Browning & Edgar K. Browning, 1976. "Welfare Analytics in General Equilibrium Theory: An Improved Geometry," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 341-350, May.
    2. Cicchetti, Charles J & Fisher, Anthony C & Smith, V Kerry, 1976. "An Econometric Evaluation of a Generalized Consumer Surplus Measure: The Mineral King Controversy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(6), pages 1259-1276, November.
    3. Burns, Michael E, 1977. "On the Uniqueness of Consumer's Surplus and the Invariance of Economic Index Numbers," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 45(1), pages 41-61, March.
    4. David S. Brookshire & Alan Randall & John R. Stoll, 1980. "Valuing Increments and Decrements in Natural Resource Service Flows," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(3), pages 478-488.
    5. J. Bruce Bullock, 1976. "Social Costs Caused by Errors in Agricultural Production Forecasts," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(1), pages 76-80.
    6. Robert L. Bishop, 1943. "Consumer's Surplus and Cardinal Utility," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 57(3), pages 421-449.
    7. Dennis C. Cory & Russell L. Gum & William E. Martin & Ray F. Brokken, 1981. "Simplified Measurement of Consumer Welfare Change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 715-717.
    8. Bradford, David F, 1970. "Benefit-Cost Analysis and Demand Curves for Public Goods," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 775-791.
    9. Cory, Dennis C. & Gum, Russell L. & Martin, William E. & Leigh, Marie, 1981. "Use of Paasche and Laspeyres Variations to Estimate Consumer Welfare Change," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 33(2), pages 1-6, April.
    10. Bergson, Abram, 1980. "Consumer's surplus and income redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 31-47, August.
    11. Boadway, Robin W, 1975. "Benefit-Cost Shadow Pricing in Open Economies: An Alternative Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(2), pages 419-430, April.
    12. Milton Friedman, 1954. "The Marshallian Demand Curve: A Reply," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(3), pages 261-261.
    13. Cross, John G, 1979. "Reinforcement Theory and the Consumer Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 61(2), pages 190-198, May.
    14. Currie, John Martin & Murphy, John A & Schmitz, Andrew, 1971. "The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 741-799, December.
    15. Chipman, John S., 1974. "Homothetic preferences and aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 26-38, May.
    16. Brookshire, David S. & Ives, Berry C. & Schulze, William D., 1976. "The valuation of aesthetic preferences," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 325-346, December.
    17. Dahlby, B G, 1977. "The Measurement of Consumer Surplus and the Path Dependence Problem," Public Finance = Finances publiques, , vol. 32(3), pages 293-311.
    18. Chipman, John S & Moore, James C, 1973. "Aggregate Demand, Real National Income, and the Compensation Principle," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 14(1), pages 153-181, February.
    19. Peter Asch & Rosalind S. Seneca, 1980. "The Demand Curve and Welfare Change: A Reconsideration," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 392-404, April.
    20. Martin J. Bailey, 1954. "The Marshallian Demand Curve," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(3), pages 255-255.
    21. Burns, Michael E, 1973. "A Note on the Concept and Measure of Consumer's Surplus," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(3), pages 335-344, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bergstrom, John C. & Dillman, B.L. & Stoll, John R., 1985. "Public Environmental Amenity Benefits Of Private Land: The Case Of Prime Agricultural Land," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Randall, Alan, 1982. "Economic Surplus Concepts and Their Use in Benefit Cost Analysis," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Brookshire, David S, et al, 1982. "Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 165-177, March.
    4. Walter Hettich, 1976. "Distribution in Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Review of Theoretical Issues," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(2), pages 123-150, April.
    5. Hervani, Aref Agahei & Sarkis, Joseph & Helms, Marilyn M., 2017. "Environmental goods valuations for social sustainability: A conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 137-153.
    6. Forbush, Marie Leigh & Gum, Russell & Mertin, William E. & Cory, Dennis & Weisz, Reuben N. & Teigen, Llyod, 1980. "Impacts On Consumers: Welfare Economics In The Multiproduct Case," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 279727, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Hoehn, John P. & Randall, Alan, 1982. "Aggregation And Disaggregation Of Program Benefit In A Complex Policy Environment," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279230, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Loehman, Edna T., 1991. "Alternative Measures of Benefit for Nonmarket Goods Which are Substitutes or Complements for Market Goods," Working Papers 115913, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    9. Bergstrom, John C. & Stoll, John R., 1985. "Cognitive Decision Processes, Information, and Contingent Valuation," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278589, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Donald K. Richter, 1977. "Games Pythagoreans Play," Public Finance Review, , vol. 5(4), pages 495-515, October.
    11. David Brookshire & Thomas Crocker, 1981. "The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 235-252, January.
    12. Ju, Biung-Ghi, 2004. "Continuous selections from the Pareto correspondence and non-manipulability in exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 573-592, August.
    13. Cristiano Cechella, 2011. "The Influence Of Cultural Affinity For The Boost Of Brazilian Investment In Portugal," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 59-72, June.
    14. Glenn P. Jenkins & Chun-Yan kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2020. "Analyse Couts-Avantages Pour Les Decisions D’Investissement Chapitre 9; Le Prix Ombre Des Bourses D'échange Et De Marchandises Non Commercialisables," Development Discussion Papers 2020-09, JDI Executive Programs.
    15. Richard Pomfret, 1978. "The economic consequences for Israel of free trade in manufactured goods with the EEC," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 114(3), pages 526-539, September.
    16. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    17. Javelosa, Josyline C. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2006. "Costs and Benefits of a WTO Dispute: Philippine Bananas and the Australian Market," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26.
    18. Osbat, Chiara & Conflitti, Cristina & Eiglsperger, Martin & Goldhammer, Bernhard & Kuik, Friderike & Menz, Jan-Oliver & Rumler, Fabio & Moreno, Marta Saez & Segers, Lina & Wieland, Elisabeth & Bellocc, 2023. "Measuring inflation with heterogeneous preferences, taste shifts and product innovation: methodological challenges and evidence from microdata," Occasional Paper Series 323, European Central Bank.
    19. Jeffrey Englin & Klaus Moeltner, 2004. "The Value of Snowfall to Skiers and Boarders," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 29(1), pages 123-136, September.
    20. Nguyen, Thanh Cong & Le, Hoa Thu & Nguyen, Hang Dieu & Ngo, Mai Thanh & Nguyen, Hong Quang, 2021. "Examining ordering effects and strategic behaviour in a discrete choice experiment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 394-413.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.