IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea18/266685.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farm Management Implications of Transitioning from Conventional to Organic Production: An Application of Whole-Farm Linear Programming Model to Examine Transition Period

Author

Listed:
  • Carls, Emily
  • Griffin, Terry
  • Ibendahl, Gregory

Abstract

Over the past decade, organic farming has gained popularity among both consumers and producers. As producers consider the decision to shift from conventional to organic production, the farm management question asks under what price ratios can farmers be enticed to endure transition periods. Current rules require at least three years of organic production before the crop can be marketed as ‘organic’. Using a whole-farm linear programming (LP) model, these ‘non-productive’ transition years were modeled to examine the conditions that entice farmers to convert from conventionally grown corn. Results assist producers in making long term decisions with the objective to maximize returns to their operations. The LP base farm was parameterized using a central Illinois farm including local information on 1) production practices for a corn and soybean rotation, 2) yield penalties for plant and harvest date combinations, and 3) fieldwork probabilities. Preliminary results indicate that given expected price ratios of conventional commodities relative to a $11/bu organic corn price, producers would be willing to begin organic production.

Suggested Citation

  • Carls, Emily & Griffin, Terry & Ibendahl, Gregory, 2018. "Farm Management Implications of Transitioning from Conventional to Organic Production: An Application of Whole-Farm Linear Programming Model to Examine Transition Period," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266685, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea18:266685
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266685/files/Farm%20Management%20Implications%20of%20Transitioning%20from%20Conventional%20to%20Organic%20Production.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266685/files/Farm%20Management%20Implications%20of%20Transitioning%20from%20Conventional%20to%20Organic%20Production.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delbridge, Timothy A. & Fernholz, Carmen & King, Robert P. & Lazarus, William, 2013. "A whole-farm profitability analysis of organic and conventional cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delate, Kathleen & Cambardella, Cynthia & Chase, Craig & Turnbull, Robert, 2015. "A Review of Long-Term Organic Comparison Trials in the U.S," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(3 Special).
    2. Skydan, Oleg & Nykolyuk, Olga & Chaikin, Oleksandr & Shukalovych, Vasyl, 2021. "Concept of fractal organization of organic business systems," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(2), June.
    3. Heinrichs, J. & Kuhn, T. & Pahmeyer, C. & Britz, W., 2021. "Economic effects of plot sizes and farm-plot distances in organic and conventional farming systems: A farm-level analysis for Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Delbridge, Timothy A. & King, Robert P., 2016. "Transitioning to Organic Crop Production: A Dynamic Programming Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Cox, William & Hanchar, John, 2016. "Agronomic and Economic Performance of Soybean as an Entry Crop to an Organic Cropping System following Conventional Corn, Spring Barley, or Soybean," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235318, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. McBride, William D. & Greene, Catherine & Foreman, Linda & Ali, Mir, 2015. "The Profit Potential of Certified Organic Field Crop Production," Economic Research Report 262208, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Elodie Letort & Aude Ridier, 2022. "The economic performance of transitional and non-transitional organic dairy farms: A panel data econometric approach in Brittany [Les performances économiques des exploitations laitières en agricul," Working Papers hal-03635268, HAL.
    8. M. Kavka & M. Mimra & F. Kumhála, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of key operating parameters of combine harvesters," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(3), pages 113-121.
    9. Kwamina Ewur Banson & Nam C. Nguyen & Ockie J. H. Bosch, 2016. "Using System Archetypes to Identify Drivers and Barriers for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa: A Case Study in Ghana," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 79-99, January.
    10. Delbridge, Timothy A., 2014. "Comparative Profitability of Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems: An Update to Per-Hectare and Whole-Farm Analysis," Staff Papers 164685, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Pashaei Kamali, Farahnaz & Borges, João A.R. & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & de Boer, Imke J.M. & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2017. "Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems: The validity of expert opinion and robustness of a multi-criteria analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 118-128.
    12. Cox, W., 2018. "Agronomic and Economic Performance of Maize, Soybean, and Wheat in Different Rotations during the Transition to an Organic Cropping System," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276954, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Elodie Letort & Aude Ridier, 2022. "The economic performance of transitional and non-transitional organic dairy farms: A panel data econometric approach in Brittany," Working Papers SMART 22-03, INRAE UMR SMART.
    14. Wieme, Rachel A. & Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne A. & Crowder, David W. & Murphy, Kevin M. & Reganold, John P., 2020. "Agronomic and economic performance of organic forage, quinoa, and grain crop rotations in the Palouse region of the Pacific Northwest, USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Vlašicová, Eliška & Náglová, Zdeňka, 2015. "Differences in the Economic Situation of Organic and Conventional Winemaking Enterprises," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, September.
    16. Riccardo Testa & Anna Maria di Trapani & Filippo Sgroi & Salvatore Tudisca, 2014. "Economic Sustainability of Italian Greenhouse Cherry Tomato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Khanal, Aditya R. & Mishra, Sachin K & Honey, Ummey, 2018. "Certified organic food production, financial performance, and farm size: An unconditional quantile regression approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 367-376.
    18. Froehlich, Anderson G. & Melo, Andrea S.S.A. & Sampaio, Breno, 2018. "Comparing the Profitability of Organic and Conventional Production in Family Farming: Empirical Evidence From Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 307-314.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; Farm Management; Production Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea18:266685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.