IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331871.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of CO2 emissions based on the consumption-based measurement under CO2 reduction scenarios of different reduction levels

Author

Listed:
  • Homma, Takashi
  • Akimoto, Keigo
  • Tomoda, Toshimasa

Abstract

This study evaluates the regional and sectoral CO2 emissions estimated by different CO2 emissions accounting methodologies around 2050 under different CO2 reduction scenarios. The production-based measurement of CO2 emissions is based on polluter pays principle, while the consumption-based measurement is based on beneficiary pays principle. In the field of global warming, the widely used methodology for CO2 emissions accounting is the production-based measurement of CO2 emissions generated inside a country. Recently, the consumption-based emissions measurement, which is similar to the concepts of carbon footprint or CO2 visualization, started to be recognized as one of alternative approaches for the substantial reduction of CO2. The international trade accompanied with the CO2 emissions that are defined to be emitted in production and distribution processes outside the country is taken into account for consumption-based CO2 emissions measurements. Most of previous studies only focused on the historical estimations of consumption-based CO2 emissions and there are few analyses on the future consumption-based emissions corresponding to CO2 reduction scenarios. This paper presents the future consumption-based CO2 emissions by region and by sector toward 2050 under severe reduction scenarios of CO2 using GTAP database in the base year and an energy-economic model with multi-regions and multi-sectors. The introductions of CO2 emission reduction policies aimed at the level of 550ppmv CO2 stabilization target and the target of halving emissions by 2050 lead to the international structures of industry where goods with relatively high CO2 intensity consumed in developed regions are produced in developing regions through international trade. More stringent reduction levels of production-based CO2 emission lead to much higher consumption-based CO2 emissions in the OECD region.

Suggested Citation

  • Homma, Takashi & Akimoto, Keigo & Tomoda, Toshimasa, 2009. "Evaluation of CO2 emissions based on the consumption-based measurement under CO2 reduction scenarios of different reduction levels," Conference papers 331871, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331871/files/4306.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence H. Goulder, 1998. "Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 1, pages 279-328, November.
    2. Lawrence H. Goulder & Ian W.H. Parry & Roberton C. Williams III & Dallas Burtraw, 2002. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting," Chapters, in: Lawrence H. Goulder (ed.), Environmental Policy Making in Economies with Prior Tax Distortions, chapter 27, pages 523-554, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Robinson, Sherman, 1990. "Pollution, Market Failure, and Optimal Policy in an Economywide Framework," CUDARE Working Papers 198571, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Delfin Go & Marna Kearney & Vijdan Korman & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2010. "Wage Subsidy and Labour Market Flexibility in South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(9), pages 1481-1502.
    5. Bev Dahlby, 2008. "The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Applications," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262042509, December.
    6. Aldy, Joseph E. & Ley, Eduardo & Parry, Ian, 2008. "A Tax–Based Approach to Slowing Global Climate Change," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 61(3), pages 493-517, September.
    7. Sherman ROBINSON & Scott MCDONALD & Karen THIERFELDER, 2008. "Leveling the Playing Field: Taxing Energy Use and Carbon Emissions," EcoMod2008 23800115, EcoMod.
    8. Xie, Jian & Saltzman, Sidney, 2000. "Environmental Policy Analysis: An Environmental Computable General-Equilibrium Approach for Developing Countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 453-489, July.
    9. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Go, Delfin S., 1998. "The Simplest Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of an Open Economy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 677-714, December.
    10. Lawrence H. Goulder, 1998. "Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 279-328, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Go, Delfin S. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2009. "Tax policy to reduce carbon emissions in south Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4933, The World Bank.
    2. Devarajan Shantayanan & Go Delfin S & Robinson Sherman & Thierfelder Karen, 2011. "Tax Policy to Reduce Carbon Emissions in a Distorted Economy: Illustrations from a South Africa CGE Model," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Ian W. H. Parry, 2003. "Fiscal Interactions and the Case for Carbon Taxes Over Grandfathered Carbon Permits," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 385-399.
    4. Linda Ferguson & Peter Mcgregor & J. Kim Swales & Karen Turner & Ya Ping Yin, 2005. "Incorporating sustainability indicators into a computable general equilibrium model of the scottish economy," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 103-140.
    5. Daniel Jaqua & Daniel Schaffa, 2022. "The case for subsidizing harm: constrained and costly Pigouvian taxation with multiple externalities," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(2), pages 408-442, April.
    6. Macdonald, Kevin & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2021. "Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing," GLO Discussion Paper Series 955, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Ying, Zhang & Irland, LIoyd & Zhou, Xiaohong & Song, Yajie & Wen, Yali & Liu, Junchang & Song, Weimin & Qiu, Yang, 2010. "Plantation development: Economic analysis of forest management in Fujian Province, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 223-230, March.
    8. Govinda R. Timilsina & Ram M. Shrestha, 2002. "General equilibrium analysis of economic and environmental effects of carbon tax in a developing country: case of Thailand," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 5(3), pages 179-211, September.
    9. Lori Bennear & Robert Stavins, 2007. "Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 111-129, May.
    10. Go, Delfin S. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2016. "Natural resource revenue, spending strategies and economic growth in Niger," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 564-573.
    11. Ioannis Tikoudis & Walid Oueslati, 2021. "MOLES: A New Approach to Modeling the Environmental and Economic Impacts of Urban Policies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 641-690, October.
    12. Fischer, Carolyn & Springborn, Michael, 2011. "Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 352-366.
    13. Oueslati, Walid, 2013. "Short and Long-term Effects of Environmental Tax Reform," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 146354, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Jesse D. Jenkins & Valerie J. Karplus, 2016. "Carbon pricing under binding political constraints," WIDER Working Paper Series 044, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Lynn Mainwaring & Richard Jones & David Blackaby, 2006. "Devolution, sustainability and GDP convergence: Is the Welsh agenda achievable?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 679-689.
    16. Xinming Du, 2023. "Symptom or Culprit? Social Media, Air Pollution, and Violence," CESifo Working Paper Series 10296, CESifo.
    17. Gonzalez, Fidel, 2012. "Distributional effects of carbon taxes: The case of Mexico," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2102-2115.
    18. Oueslati, Walid, 2014. "Environmental tax reform: Short-term versus long-term macroeconomic effects," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 190-201.
    19. Govinda Timilsina & Ram Shrestha, 2002. "General equilibrium analysis of economic and environmental effects of carbon tax in a developing country: case of Thailand," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 5(3), pages 179-211, September.
    20. Goulder, Lawrence H., 2013. "Climate change policy's interactions with the tax system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(S1), pages 3-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.