IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ohswps/28320.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact Of Cfta/Nafta On U.S. And Canadian Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Tweeten, Luther G.
  • Sharples, Jerry A.
  • Evers-Smith, Linda

Abstract

CFTA/NAFTA is estimated annually to add $1,430 million of U.S. agricultural exports to Canada and $1,884 million of Canadian agricultural exports to the United States. Thus CFTA/NAFTA contributed an estimated 25 percent of the $5.8 billion of U.S. agricultural exports to Canada in 1995. Classical welfare analysis was used to estimate the implications of free trade in the dairy, poultry, sugar, and other industries that continue to be protected. In aggregate, consumers benefit from liberalization by nearly $1 billion per year in each country. Losses to Canadian producers are absolutely and relatively greater than to U.S. producers. Overall deadweight gains are positive to each country. The annual combined two-country addition to national income ($292 million) totals a present value of $5.8 billion when discounted in perpetuity at a 5 percent rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Tweeten, Luther G. & Sharples, Jerry A. & Evers-Smith, Linda, 1997. "Impact Of Cfta/Nafta On U.S. And Canadian Agriculture," Working Papers 28320, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ohswps:28320
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28320/files/wp970003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.28320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 1995. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States January/February 1995," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164392, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Unknown, 1996. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States October/November/December 1996," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164401, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Unknown, 1996. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States Calendar Year 1995 Supplement," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164397, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Unknown, 1995. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States July/August 1995," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164393, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Sullivan, John & Wainio, John & Roningen, Vernon, 1989. "A Database For Trade Liberalization Studies," Staff Reports 278178, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Normile, Mary Anne & Goodloe, Carol A., 1988. "U.S.-Canadian Agricultural Trade Issues: Implications For The Bilateral Trade Agreement," Staff Reports 278028, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dermot J. Hayes & Frank H. Fuller, 1999. "Optimal Chinese Agricultural Trade Patterns under the Laws of Comparative Advantage," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 99-wp233, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 1998. "Dynamic Complementarity In Export Promotion: The Market Access Program In Fruits And Vegetables," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14565, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Epperson, James E. & Estes, Edmund A., 1999. "Fruit And Vegetable Supply-Chain Management, Innovations, And Competitiveness: Cooperative Regional Research Project S-222," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 1-6, November.
    5. Hughes, Karol W. & Kennedy, P. Lynn & Ortego, Albert, 1996. "Export Behavior Of Louisiana Agribusiness Firms," AEA Information Series 31673, Louisiana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    6. Bjornlund, Britta & Cochrane, Nancy J. & Haley, Mildred M. & Hoskin, Roger & Liefert, Olga & Paarlberg, Philip L., 2002. "Livestock Sectors In The Economies Of Eastern Europe And The Former Soviet Union; Transition From Plan To Market And The Road Ahead," Agricultural Economic Reports 33977, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Lynch, Loretta & Moulton, Kirby S, 1995. "Processing Costs for Canned Peaches," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt4vb9h61z, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    8. Kennedy, P. Lynn & Petrolia, Daniel R., 2001. "Disputes In Sugar And Agricultural-Based Sweeteners," Proceedings of the 6th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2000: Trade Liberalization Under NAFTA: Report Card on Agriculture 16831, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    9. Cassells, Sue M. & Meister, Anton D. & Rae, Allan N., 2000. "The Cost and Trade Impacts of Environmental Regulations: Effluent Controls and the New Zealand Dairy Sector," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123618, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Wills, Darryl S. & Lee, Chinkook, 1997. "U.S. Agricultural Exports: A Balanced Regional Model," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35941, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Marin, Rebeca & Epperson, James E. & Ames, Glenn C.W., 1997. "A Probit Analysis of the Characteristics of Firms Engaged in the Fruit and Vegetable Trade Between the United States and Latin America," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35767, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    12. Alan Barkema & Mark Drabenstott, 1996. "Consolidation and change in heartland agriculture," Monograph, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, number 1996cacih.
    13. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2000. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For U.S. Pork Exports," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21808, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Suwartini, Endang & Coffin, H. Garth & Gunjal, Kisan, 1997. "Economic welfare analysis of policy-induced structural change in the Indonesian poultry industry," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 237-243, August.
    15. Philip C. Abbott & Panu K. S. Kallio, 1996. "Implications of Game Theory for International Agricultural Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(3), pages 738-744.
    16. Antônio Salazar P. Brandão & Will J. Martin, 1993. "Implications of agricultural trade liberalization for the developing countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(4), pages 313-343, June.
    17. Klaus Mittenzwei & David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer, 2012. "Towards a theory of policy timing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 583-596, October.
    18. Johnson, D. Demcey & Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara & Dahl, Bruce L. & Dooley, Frank J., 1996. "Trade In Minor Oilseeds: A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis Of Sunflower And Canola," Agricultural Economics Reports 23346, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    19. Batie, Sandra S. & Swinton, Scott M. & Schulz, Mary A., 1999. "Fqpa Implementation To Reduce Pesticide Residue Risks: Part I: Agricultural Producer Concerns," Staff Paper Series 11813, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    20. Koo, Won W. & Golz, Joel T. & Uhm, Ihn H., 1991. "United States and Canadian Free Trade Agreement: Economic Implications," Agricultural Economics Reports 23210, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ohswps:28320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daohsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.