IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr12/207098.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pulsating Market Boundaries and Spatial Arbitrage in US Gulf Region: Impact of Panama Canal Expansion on US Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Shakya, Sumadhur
  • Wilson, William
  • Dahl, Bruce L.

Abstract

US agricultural exports reached a record high of $137.37 billion for fiscal year (FY) 2011, an increase of 26.5 percent from FY 2010. Export capacity of bulk grain and soybean is expanding at 10 percent nationally with up to 30 percent in Pacific North West. Several other expansions have taken place with two Greenfield facilities under development one of which is opening for 2011 fall harvest. Total US grain and soybean exports are forecasted to increase more than one billion bushels or 25 percent from 2011/12 to 2020/21. Most of these exports are expected through center gulf driven towards East Asian countries via Panama Canal. Panama Canal currently handles 44 percent of total US exports. Some of the prospects from expansion of Panama Canal include increased loadings per vessel use of larger vessel size along with reduced canal transit time and lower transportation cost (overall). Grain exports are mostly exported during short time of the year, for example, soybeans are mostly exported from mid-September to mid-February. Such dynamics require efficient throughput capabilities. Other crops like Wheat and Corn have similar periodic surges and compete with surges in supply of other crops. Increased capacity of inland shuttle locations and elevators, with reduction in loading time (increased efficiency gained from technology advancement at loading facilities) combined with increased handling capacity at ports expected to benefit from panama canal expansion will open up more draw areas or increase existing draw areas for crops producing/supplying regions. This means that the areas farther away from ports may be able to export considering the expected gain in transportation cost. This study will focus on spatial arbitrage and pulsating market boundaries for some of crops at key ports specifically located in US Gulf Region and their expected impacts on US agriculture. Market boundaries (area from which the supply is drawn) for ports are expected to increase with Panama Canal expansion combined with ongoing expansion at shuttle elevators elsewhere in inland. Market boundaries are subject to price expected at destination minus the total transportation cost. Other factors that might influence the market boundaries are reliability (risk) in terms of price and volume, cost of congestion and delay time may also play a role. Since these market boundaries are subject to spatial arbitrage (difference in markets located at different geographical region), draw area is expected to change as when any of parameters affecting price at destination and transportation costs are changed. Volatility in price and transportation cost will cause change in draw areas until equilibrium is reached. This equilibrium will be defined by maximum profit that a farm/elevator/shuttle in crop producing region can expect by exporting through different ports. Choice of ports will be based on maximizing profit. Origins at boundaries are expected to be indifferent in shipping to more than one ports, however, the convenience and other factors might play important role for shipper. With price volatility and different transportation cost (determined by rates at different volume between same pair of origins and destinations, and different ports), a rational shipper is expected to maximize profit while minimizing risk. Price at destination and transportation cost are treated as random with certain distribution and expected gains will be compared from existing Panamax rates with those of post-expansion. Other variables such existing capacities of shuttle/elevators will be treated as fixed in base case and then relaxed in sensitivities. Optimization of maximum profit through various combinations of shuttle and ports will be calculated by SAS or other statistical package and spatial aspect of distance and locations will be handled by using ArcMap (ESRI). Key ports of consideration are primarily on east coast. Other ports will be considered based on their relevance to crop supplying regions. Corn and soybean will be potential crops to be analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shakya, Sumadhur & Wilson, William & Dahl, Bruce L., 2012. "Pulsating Market Boundaries and Spatial Arbitrage in US Gulf Region: Impact of Panama Canal Expansion on US Agriculture," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207098, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr12:207098
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207098/files/2012_68_Market_Arbitrage_Gulf_Panama_Canal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leroy Davis & Lowell Hill, 1974. "Spatial Price Differentials for Corn among Illinois Country Elevators," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 56(1), pages 135-144.
    2. William W. Wilson & Bruce Dahl, 2011. "Grain pricing and transportation: dynamics and changes in markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 420-434, September.
    3. Andrew Coleman, 2009. "A Model of Spatial Arbitrage with Transport Capacity Constraints and Endogenous Transport Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(1), pages 42-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pippenger, John, 2020. "The Law Of One Price, Purchasing Power Parity And Exchange Rates: Setting The Record Straight," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt2n8899rp, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    2. Sergio H. Lence & GianCarlo Moschini & Fabio Gaetano Santeramo, 2018. "Threshold cointegration and spatial price transmission when expectations matter," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(1), pages 25-39, January.
    3. W. Mark Brown & Shon M. Ferguson & Crina Viju‐Miljusevic, 2020. "Farm Size, Technology Adoption and Agricultural Trade Reform: Evidence from Canada," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 676-697, September.
    4. James B. Bushnell & Jonathan E. Hughes & Aaron Smith, 2017. "Food vs. Fuel? Impacts of Petroleum Shipments on Agricultural Prices," NBER Working Papers 23924, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Devin Serfas & Richard Gray & Peter Slade, 2018. "Congestion and Distribution of Rents in Wheat Export Sector: A Canada–U.S. Cross†Border Comparison," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(2), pages 187-207, June.
    6. Johnson, David D. & King, Robert P., 1988. "Optimal Pricing and Inventory Control for a Country Grain Elevator," Staff Papers 257665, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. John C. Beghin & Jean-Christophe Bureau & Alexandre Gohin, 2017. "The Impact of an EU–US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement on Biofuel and Feedstock Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 321-344, June.
    8. Andrew Coleman, 2008. "Storage Under Backwardation: A Direct Test of the Wright-Williams Conjecture," Working Papers 08_13, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    9. Eriko Miyama & Shunsuke Managi, 2014. "Global environmental emissions estimate: application of multiple imputation," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 16(2), pages 115-135, April.
    10. Kamrud, Gwen & Wilson, William W. & Bullock, David W., 2023. "Logistics competition between the U.S. and Brazil for soybean shipments to China: An optimized Monte Carlo simulation approach," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    11. Bekkerman, Anton & Pelletier, Denis, 2009. "Basis Volatilities of Corn and Soybean in Spatially Separated Markets: The Effect of Ethanol Demand," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49281, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Christophe Gouel, 2012. "Agricultural Price Instability: A Survey Of Competing Explanations And Remedies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 129-156, February.
    13. Jasper Grashuis, 2019. "Spatial Competition in the Iowa Corn Market: Informing the Pricing Behavior of Corporate and Cooperative Grain Merchants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Beghin, John C. & Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Gohin, Alex, 2014. "The Impact of an EU-US TTIP Agreement on Biofuel and Feedstock Markets," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197153, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    15. Gregory Galay & Henry Thille, 2021. "Pipeline capacity and the dynamics of Alberta crude oil price spreads," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 1072-1102, November.
    16. Bacbcock, Michael W. & Sorenson, L. & Chow, Ming H. & Klindworth, Keith A., 1985. "Impact of the Staggers Rail Act on agriculture: A Kansas case," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1980s 311768, Transportation Research Forum.
    17. Wenzel, Benjamin P. & Hill, Lowell D. & Garcia, Philip, 2000. "The Effects Of The Micro-Market Structure On Illinois Elevator Spatial Corn Price Differentials," 2000 Conference, April 17-18 2000, Chicago, Illinois 18927, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    18. Sorenson, L. Orlo, 1984. "Some Impacts of Rail Regulatory Changes on Grain Industries," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279102, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Woodard, Joshua & Dutta, Tridib & Xue, Lin, 2016. "Impacts of Futures Markets Speculation and Rail Transportation Networks on Commodity Basis Behavior," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236159, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Ndembe, Elvis & Bitzan, John, 2018. "Grain freight elevator consolidation, transportation demand, and the growth of shuttle facilities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 54-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr12:207098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.