IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr05/208221.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Makes them Viable? Determining the Attributes that Offer Potential Viability to Inter-Modal Truck-Rail Facilities in Washington State

Author

Listed:
  • Casavant, Ken
  • Jessup, Eric

Abstract

Efficient freight mobility is the result of successfully balancing the demand for transportation capacity and service with the quantity supplied of those services and capacities. A growing number of communities and economic interests in the state of Washington recognized that efficient freight movement is directly associated with the health of their local and regional economies. As a result, state and local governments are being asked to improve freight mobility through operational improvements and new public infrastructure. Inter-modal truck-rail facilities, where goods are transferred from truck to rail or vice-versa, for shipment to domestic markets or through gateways to international markets, are offered, or sought, as a means of improving the freight movement in the area. Proposed public investment in such inter-modal facilities raises at least two questions: Will the facility succeed in the private market place by generating a sustaining return as a commercial investment? And, is any public investment justified based on the public benefits involved? It is the combination of internal efficiencies and external competition that will affect the economic viability of the inter-modal facility itself. A great deal of information and analysis is needed to identify these necessary attributes and those operating characteristics that “would or could” produce private economic viability and, if necessary, a requited rate of return on public investment. This paper reports on the development of an applied methodology for determining the potential economic viability of inter-modal truck-rail facilities in Washington State. The focus is on discerning the attributes, characteristics or market situations that are associated with successful projects, thereby suggesting a framework for economic feasibility analysis, from both the public and private view, of an inter-modal truck-rail facility. A conceptual approach and general model of investigation is first developed in the paper. A focused review of literature followed by a summary of actual and active inter-modal centers allows the development of a series of case studies/models, chosen as examples of facilities performing differing functions in the overall supply chain for exports and imports. These are then combined with a list of attributes that are useful, even critical, to viability, allowing prioritization of the attributes for each type of case study. This then leads to the conclusions and implications of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Casavant, Ken & Jessup, Eric, 2005. "What Makes them Viable? Determining the Attributes that Offer Potential Viability to Inter-Modal Truck-Rail Facilities in Washington State," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208221, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr05:208221
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208221/files/2005_Viable_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ballis, Athanasios & Golias, John, 2002. "Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 593-611, August.
    2. Arnold, Pierre & Peeters, Dominique & Thomas, Isabelle, 2004. "Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 255-270, May.
    3. Tae Hoon Oum, 1979. "A Cross Sectional Study of Freight Transport Demand and Rail-Truck Competition in Canada," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(2), pages 463-482, Autumn.
    4. Cullinane, Kevin & Song, Dong-Wook & Gray, Richard, 2002. "A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 743-762, October.
    5. Terry L. Friesz & Joel A. Gottfried & Edward K. Morlok, 1986. "A Sequential Shipper-Carrier Network Model for Predicting Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 80-91, May.
    6. Melkote, Sanjay & Daskin, Mark S., 2001. "An integrated model of facility location and transportation network design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 515-538, July.
    7. Beuthe, Michel & Jourquin, Bart & Geerts, Jean-François & Koul à Ndjang' Ha, Christian, 2001. "Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 253-266, August.
    8. Jacques Guélat & Michael Florian & Teodor Gabriel Crainic, 1990. "A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 25-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peterson, Steven, 2005. "Factors Influencing Inter-Modal Facility Location Decisions: Comparison of Different Empirical Estimation Procedures," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208177, Transportation Research Forum.
    2. Li, Xinyan & Xie, Chi & Bao, Zhaoyao, 2022. "A multimodal multicommodity network equilibrium model with service capacity and bottleneck congestion for China-Europe containerized freight flows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Hao Wang & Linda Nozick & Ningxiong Xu & Jared Gearhart, 2018. "Modeling ocean, rail, and truck transportation flows to support policy analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 327-357, September.
    4. Zhao, Yiran & Yang, Zhongzhen & Haralambides, Hercules, 2019. "Optimizing the transport of export containers along China's coronary artery: The Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 11-25.
    5. Ron Yang, 2022. "(Don’t) Take Me Home: Home Preference and the Effect of Self-Driving Trucks on Interstate Trade," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Artificial Intelligence, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    7. Francesco Corman & Francesco Viti & Rudy R. Negenborn, 2017. "Equilibrium models in multimodal container transport systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 125-153, March.
    8. Resat, Hamdi G. & Turkay, Metin, 2015. "Design and operation of intermodal transportation network in the Marmara region of Turkey," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 16-33.
    9. Yamada, Tadashi & Febri, Zukhruf, 2015. "Freight transport network design using particle swarm optimisation in supply chain–transport supernetwork equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 164-187.
    10. Engebrethsen, Erna & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2019. "Transportation mode selection in inventory models: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 1-25.
    11. Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ritchie, Stephen G. & Jeong, Kyungsoo, 2014. "Nonlinear inverse optimization for parameter estimation of commodity-vehicle-decoupled freight assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 71-91.
    12. Fernández L., J. Enrique & de Cea Ch., Joaquín & O., Alexandra Soto, 2003. "A multi-modal supply-demand equilibrium model for predicting intercity freight flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 615-640, August.
    13. Majbah Uddin & Nathan Huynh, 2019. "Reliable Routing of Road-Rail Intermodal Freight under Uncertainty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 929-952, September.
    14. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Laporte, Gilbert, 1997. "Planning models for freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 409-438, March.
    15. Michel Beuthe & Bart Jourquin & Natalie Urbain, 2014. "Estimating Freight Transport Price Elasticity in Multi-mode Studies: A Review and Additional Results from a Multimodal Network Model," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 626-644, September.
    16. Zhao, Laijun & Zhao, Yue & Hu, Qingmi & Li, Huiyong & Stoeter, Johan, 2018. "Evaluation of consolidation center cargo capacity and loctions for China railway express," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 58-81.
    17. Tadashi Yamada & Bona Frazila Russ & Jun Castro & Eiichi Taniguchi, 2009. "Designing Multimodal Freight Transport Networks: A Heuristic Approach and Applications," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 129-143, May.
    18. Portugal, Licinio da Silva & Morgado, Andréa Vaz & Júnior, Orlando Lima, 2011. "Location of cargo terminals in metropolitan areas of developing countries: the Brazilian case," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 900-910.
    19. Figueiredo De Oliveira, Gabriel & Cariou, Pierre, 2015. "The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 124-133.
    20. SangHyun Cheon & Dong-Wook Song & Sungjin Park, 2018. "Does more competition result in better port performance?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 433-455, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr05:208221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://trforum.org/annual-forum/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.