IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25511.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deregulation of the Maize Marketing System of Swaziland and Implications for Food Security

Author

Listed:
  • Mashinini, Nkosazana N.
  • Obi, Ajuruchukwu
  • van Schalkwyk, Herman D.

Abstract

Recent shortfalls in the supply of maize in the Kingdom of Swaziland have exacerbated the country's growing food insecurity and led to fresh calls for full deregulation of the maize marketing system. The proponents of deregulation believe that it eliminates inefficient production and service units by transferring resources to their best alternative uses. While the theoretical foundations for that position are not questionable, no studies have to date explicitly investigated the effects of the current arrangements and the potential effects of full deregulation. This paper reports on a study that examined the welfare effects of the regulation of the country's maize industry and considered the likely impacts of full deregulation of the industry. Using a partial equilibrium model, the study established that the current market arrangements for the maize industry are distortionary and make the maize marketing system of Swaziland highly uncompetitive. The results show that high efficiency losses result from the misallocation of productive resources and that these have been rising over the years. Consumption deadweight losses were also shown to be equally serious and put at risk the attainment of food security for the generality of the Swazi population. The paper sees deregulation as an important practical step to improve the competitiveness of the maize industry and enhance food security through creating the basis for more effective management of the internal maize distribution channel in Swaziland.

Suggested Citation

  • Mashinini, Nkosazana N. & Obi, Ajuruchukwu & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 2006. "Deregulation of the Maize Marketing System of Swaziland and Implications for Food Security," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25511, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25511
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25511/files/pp062640.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm D. Bale & Ernst Lutz, 1981. "Price Distortions in Agriculture and Their Effects: An International Comparison," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 8-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D.-L. Phan, 1989. "Politique agricole commune et évolution de l'avantage comparatif : les produits agro-alimentaires (1973-1983)," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 10, pages 5-23.
    2. Boussard, Jean-Marc & Gérard, Françoise & Piketty, Marie Gabrielle, 2005. "Evaluating the Benefits from Liberalization: are Standard Walrassian Models Relevant?," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232587, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Lee, David R. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1992. "The Structure of Research and Transfer Policies in International Agriculture: Evidence and Implications," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197731, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Ian Coxhead & Sisira Jayasuriya, 1994. "Technical Change in Agriculture and Land Degradation in Developing Countries: A General Equilibrium Analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(1), pages 20-37.
    5. Harald Witzke, 1986. "Endogenous supranational policy decisions: The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 157-174, January.
    6. repec:ags:ucdegw:233339 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Van Kooten, G. C. & Spriggs, John & Schmitz, Andrew, 1989. "The Impact of Canadian Commodity Stabilization Programs on Risk Reduction and the Supply of Agricultural Commodities," Working Papers 244037, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    8. Shifa, Abdulaziz B., 2013. "The dual policy in the dual economy—The political economy of urban bias in dictatorial regimes," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 77-85.
    9. Barichello, Richard R., 1988. "The Political Economy of Agricultural Policy in Asia : The Case of Indonesia," 1988 Conference, August 24-31, 1988, Buenos Aires, Argentina 183110, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Fertő, Imre, 1998. "Az agrárpolitika politikai gazdaságtana II. Az agrárpolitikák magyarázata [The political economy of agrarian policy. Part II. Explanation of the agrarian policies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 297-316.
    11. Coxhead, Ian A. & Jayasuriya, Sisira, 1992. "Food Crops, Tree Crops and Land Degradation in Developing Countries: A General Equilibrium Analysis," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146434, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Roningen, Vernon O. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1989. "Economic Implications Of Agricultural Policy Reforms In Industrial Market Economies," Staff Reports 278843, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Bale, Malcolm D. & Lutz, Ernst, 1981. "Agricultural Pricing Policies in Developed and Developing Countries: Their Effects on Efficiency, Distribution, and Rural Change," 1981 Occasional Paper Series No. 2 197129, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Tyers, Rodney, 1991. "On The Neglect Of Dynamics, Risk And Market Insulation In The Analysis Of Uruguay Round Food Trade Reforms," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(3), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Ehui, M.K. & Ehui, Simeon K., 1997. "Optimal Pricing of Primary Commodities in Developing Countries: A Model from Sub-Saharan Africa," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198054, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Biswas, Amit K. & Marjit, Sugata, 2003. "Interpreting Trade Statistics in Regulated and Deregulated Markets - An Analytical Exercise Based on Indian Experience," Conference papers 331070, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Muhammad Sarwar Zahid & Abdul Qayyum & Wasim Shahid Malik, 2007. "Dynamics of Wheat Market Integration in Northern Punjab, Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 817-830.
    18. Jean-Claude Nascimento & Marc Raffinot, 1985. "Politique de prix agricoles et comportement des producteurs : le cas de l'arachide au Sénégal," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(4), pages 779-796.
    19. Anderson, Kym, 1983. "Economic Growth, Comparative Advantage and Agricultural Trade of Pacific Rim Countries," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(03), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Blackman, Allen & Mathis, Mitchell & Nelson, Peter, 2001. "The Greening of Development Economics: A Survey," Discussion Papers 10662, Resources for the Future.
    21. Wiebelt, Manfred & Herrmann, Roland & Schenck, Patricia & Thiele, Rainer, 1992. "Discrimination against agriculture in developing countries?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 458, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.