IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25293.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Results On Censored Regression with Applications to Transactions Costs, Household Decisions and Food Purchases

Author

Listed:
  • Holloway, Garth J.
  • Mazzocchi, Mario
  • Perali, Carlo Federico

Abstract

We generalize the Tobit censored regression to permit unique unobserved censoring thresholds conditioned by covariates and a set of common response coefficients. This situation , we argue, is one arising frequently in applications of censored regression and we provide three diverse examples to motivate the theory. We derive a robust estimation algorithm with three noteworthy features. First, by augmenting the observed-data likelihood with the censored observations, the estimation strategy is the same as Chib (1992) who derives Bayes estimates of the conventional censored regression. Second, by virtue of its generality, the model is applicable to a much broader set of circumstances than the conventional Tobit regression, which is nested as a special case of the more general framework. Third, despite its generality and wide applicability, the estimation algorithm is very simple, evidencing routine application of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (MCMC)-Gibbs sampling in particular- and requiring only modest extensions of the basic algorithm in Chib (1992). The model and procedures are illustrated empirically in three applications that we use to motivate the theory, namely problems in transactions-costs economics, household decision-making and food-consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Holloway, Garth J. & Mazzocchi, Mario & Perali, Carlo Federico, 2006. "New Results On Censored Regression with Applications to Transactions Costs, Household Decisions and Food Purchases," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25293, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25293
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25293/files/pp060589.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fair, Ray C, 1978. "A Theory of Extramarital Affairs," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(1), pages 45-61, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Cameron & Alan Collins, 2003. "Estimates of a Model of Male Participation in the Market for Female Heterosexual Prostitution Services," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 271-288, November.
    2. Eiji Yamamura, 2016. "Smokers’ Preference for Divorce and Extramarital Sex," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 59(2), pages 44-76.
    3. Ian Smith, 2012. "Reinterpreting the economics of extramarital affairs," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-343, September.
    4. Samuel Cameron, 2002. "The Economics Of Partner Out Trading in Sexual Markets," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 195-222, October.
    5. Chandran, Ram, 2004. "A Tobit Analysis of WIC Children's Consumption of Pyramid Group Foods," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19998, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. C. Simon Fan & Hon‐Kwong Lui, 2004. "Extramarital Affairs, Marital Satisfaction, and Divorce: Evidence from Hong Kong," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 22(4), pages 442-452, October.
    7. Cameron, Samuel & Collins, Alan, 2000. "Random utility maximiser seeks similar: An economic analysis of commitment level in personal relationships," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 73-90, February.
    8. Adamopoulou, Effrosyni, 2013. "New facts on infidelity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 458-462.
    9. Sheena Murray, 2020. "How broadband and cell phone access have impacted marriage and divorce in the US," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 431-459, June.
    10. Uwe Jirjahn & Martha Ottenbacher, 2023. "Big Five personality traits and sex," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 549-580, April.
    11. Iñaki Mauleón, 1987. "Problemas prácticos en el tratamiento econométrico de datos "cross-section"," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 11(1), pages 41-94, January.
    12. Hafiz M. Muddasar Jamil Shera & Irum Sajjad Dar, 2014. "Addressing Corner Solution Effect for Child Mortality Status Measure: An Application of Tobit Model," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(12), pages 218-225, December.
    13. Ana María Martínez-Rodríguez & Antonio Conde-Sánchez & María José Olmo-Jiménez, 2019. "A new approach to truncated regression for count data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(4), pages 503-526, December.
    14. Steven Yen, 1999. "Nonparticipation and corner solution: extramarital affairs reconsidered," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(7), pages 443-445.
    15. Curt Wells, 2003. "Retesting Fair's (1978) model on infidelity," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 237-239.
    16. Jemimah Gaite Pizarro & Rowena Gaspay-Fernandez, 2015. "Estranged Wife, Other Man’s Beloved," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440145, January.
    17. Lu, Zeng-Hua, 2009. "Covariate selection in mixture models with the censored response variable," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2710-2723, May.
    18. Fair, Ray C, 1977. "A Note on the Computation of the Tobit Estimator," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(7), pages 1723-1727, October.
    19. Bloze, Gintautas & Skak, Morten, 2014. "Owning, letting and demanding second homes," Discussion Papers on Economics 1/2014, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    20. Eoghan O'Neill, 2022. "Type I Tobit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees for Censored Outcome Regression," Papers 2211.07506, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.