IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare12/124284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Impacts of GHG and Nutrient Reduction Policies in New Zealand: A Tale of Two Catchments

Author

Listed:
  • Daigneault, Adam J.
  • Greenhalgh, Suzie
  • Samarasinghe, Oshadhi

Abstract

Agricultural and forestry GHG emissions are a key feature of New Zealand’s emissions profile, and New Zealand is the only country, to date, to have indicated that agricultural and forestry emissions will be covered under their domestic climate policy – the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. Coupled with climate policy development is the increasing scrutiny of agricultural impacts on water. This paper uses New Zealand Forest and Agriculture Regional Model (NZ-FARM) to assess the potential economic and environmental impacts of imposing both a climate and nutrient reduction policy on the agricultural and forestry industries in the Manawatu and Hurunui/Waiau catchments in New Zealand. We find that adding a scheme that reduces catchment-level nutrients by 20% on top of a national policy that puts a price of $25 per ton carbon dioxide equivalent on agricultural GHG emissions could result in greater environmental benefits at a relatively small cost, but the converse is not always true and could be significantly more costly for landowners.

Suggested Citation

  • Daigneault, Adam J. & Greenhalgh, Suzie & Samarasinghe, Oshadhi, 2012. "Economic Impacts of GHG and Nutrient Reduction Policies in New Zealand: A Tale of Two Catchments," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124284, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare12:124284
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.124284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124284/files/2012AC%20Daigneault%20CP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.124284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johansson, Robert & Peters, Mark & House, Robert, 2007. "Regional Environment and Agriculture Programming Model," Technical Bulletins 184314, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Joanna Hendy & Suzi Kerr & Troy Baisden, 2006. "Greenhouse gas emissions charges and credits agricultural land: what can a model tell us?," Working Papers 06_04, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fraser J. Morgan & Philip Brown & Adam J. Daigneault, 2015. "Simulation vs. Definition: Differing Approaches to Setting Probabilities for Agent Behaviour," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Daigneault, Adam J. & Morgan, Fraser, 2012. "Estimating Impacts of Climate Change Policy on Land Use: An Agent Based Modeling Approach," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124973, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Suzi Kerr, 2013. "Managing Risks and Tradeoffs Using Water Markets," Working Papers 13_13, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    4. Fraser J Morgan & Adam J Daigneault, 2015. "Estimating Impacts of Climate Change Policy on Land Use: An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Suzi Kerr & Simon Anastasiadis & Alex Olssen & William Power & Levente Tímár & Wei Zhang, 2012. "Spatial and Temporal Responses to an Emissions Trading System Covering Agriculture and Forestry: Simulation Results from New Zealand," Working Papers 12_10, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    6. Suzi Kerr, 2016. "Agricultural Emissions Mitigation in New Zealand: Answers to Questions from the Parliamentary Commisioner for the Environment," Working Papers 16_16, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daigneault, Adam J. & Greenhalgh, Suzie & Samarasinghe, Oshadhi, 2013. "Economic and environmental impacts of implementing multiple agro-environmental policies in New Zealand," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150572, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Adam Daigneault & Suzie Greenhalgh & Oshadhi Samarasinghe, 2018. "Economic Impacts of Multiple Agro-Environmental Policies on New Zealand Land Use," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(4), pages 763-785, April.
    3. Sands, Ronald D. & Malcolm, Scott A. & Suttles, Shellye A. & Marshall, Elizabeth, 2017. "Dedicated Energy Crops and Competition for Agricultural Land," Economic Research Report 252445, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Syed Shurid Khan & Shawn Arita & Richard Howitt & PingSun Leung, 2022. "Evaluating change in property tax regime on noncommercial food production using a modified positive mathematical programming model," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Doole, Graeme J. & Marsh, Dan K., 2014. "Methodological limitations in the evaluation of policies to reduce nitrate leaching from New Zealand agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(1), January.
    6. Hellerstein, Daniel & Malcolm, Scott, 2011. "The Influence of Rising Commodity Prices on the Conservation Reserve Program," Economic Research Report 262244, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. John M. Antle & Claudio O. Stöckle, 2017. "Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Insights from Agronomic-Economic Analysis," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(2), pages 299-318.
    8. Kovacs, Kent, 2022. "Evidence of the social cost of agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation with second best policies: A national optimization model of United States crop and livestock production," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322066, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Lennox, James A. & Andrew, Robbie & Forgie, V., 2008. "Price effects of an emissions trading scheme in New Zealand," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6678, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Michael Livingston & Michael J. Roberts & Yue Zhang, 2015. "Optimal Sequential Plantings of Corn and Soybeans Under Price Uncertainty," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(3), pages 855-878.
    11. Crane-Droesch, Andrew & Marshall, Elizabeth & Riddle, Anne & Rosch, Stephanie D. & Cooper, Joseph C. & Wallander, Steven, 2018. "Climate and Crop Insurance: Agricultural Risk Management into the 21st Century," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274292, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Marshall, Elizabeth & Aillery, Marcel & Ribaudo, Marc & Key, Nigel & Sneeringer, Stacy & Hansen, LeRoy & Malcolm, Scott & Riddle, Anne, 2018. "Reducing Nutrient Losses From Cropland in the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin: Cost Efficiency and Regional Distribution," Economic Research Report 277567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Garnache, Cloe & Merel, Pierre R., 2011. "Calibrating a regional PMP model of agricultural supply under multiple constraints: a set of matryoshka doll conditions," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114630, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Jonathan R. Sweeney & Richard E. Howitt & Hing Ling Chan & Minling Pan & PingSun Leung, 2017. "How do fishery policies affect Hawaii's longline fishing industry? Calibrating a positive mathematical programming model," Papers 1707.03960, arXiv.org.
    15. Xu, Yuelu & Elbakidze, Levan, 2021. "Integrated assessment of N runoff in the Gulf of Mexico: an application of spatially explicit partial equilibrium and HAWQS models," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313917, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Aghabeygi, Mona & Louhichi, Kamel & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2022. "Impacts of fertilizer subsidy reform options in Iran: an assessment using a Regional Crop Programming model," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(1), April.
    17. Heckelei, Thomas & Britz, Wolfgang & Zhang, Yinan, 2012. "Positive Mathematical Programming Approaches – Recent Developments in Literature and Applied Modelling," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Daigneault, Adam J. & Greenhalgh, Suzie & Samarasinghe, Oshadhi, 2011. "Estimated Impacts of New Zealand Agriculture Climate Policy: A Tale of Two Catchments," 2011 Conference, August 25-26, 2011, Nelson, New Zealand 115352, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. Daigneault, Adam & Greenhalgh, Suzie & Samarasinghe, Oshadhi, 2014. "A response to Doole and Marsh (2013) article: methodological limitations in the evaluation of policies to reduce nitrate leaching from New Zealand agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(2), April.
    20. Hansen, LeRoy & Ribaudo, Marc, 2008. "Economic Measures of Soil Conservation Benefits: Regional Values for Policy Assessment," Technical Bulletins 184312, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare12:124284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.