IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-24262-7_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Competition among Jurisdictions: The Idea of FOCJ

In: Competition among Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno S. Frey
  • Reiner Eichenberger

Abstract

The single European economic market has been a great success. The four freedoms relating to the movement of goods, services, labour and capital have without doubt significantly increased the welfare of the citizens within the European Union. With respect to politics, including economic policy, the picture is rather different. Essentially, one institution, the European Commission and its bureaucracy, has established itself as a monopoly government for European affairs, despite its so far limited powers. This paper argues that similar welfare improvements as in economic affairs could be reached in political affairs as well, provided the European Constitution allows for, and actively supports, competition between governments at all levels. The competition between already existing governments must be preserved but in addition a future European Constitution should foster the emergence of competitive new jurisdictions best serving individual preferences. These new governmental units are called FOCJ. The acronym relates to its four major characteristics: F = functional, i.e. the new political units extend over areas defined by the tasks to be fulfilled; O = overlapping, i.e. in line with the many different tasks (functions) there are many different governmental units extending over different geographical areas; C = competing, i.e. individuals and/or communes may chose to what governmental unit they want to belong, and they have political rights to express their preferences directly via initiative and referenda; J = jurisdictions, i.e. the units established are governmental, they have enforcement power and can, in particular, raise taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno S. Frey & Reiner Eichenberger, 1995. "Competition among Jurisdictions: The Idea of FOCJ," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Lüder Gerken (ed.), Competition among Institutions, chapter 8, pages 209-229, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-24262-7_8
    DOI: 10.1007/9781349242627_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruno S. Frey, 2001. "A Utopia? Government Without Territorial Monopoly," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(1), pages 162-175, March.
    2. Wolfgang Kerber, 2003. "Wettbewerbsföderalismus als Integrationskonzept für die Europäische Union," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 43-64, February.
    3. Wolfgang Kerber & Oliver Budzinski, "undated". "Towards a Differentiated Analysis of Competition of Competition Laws," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2004-1-1090, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    4. Frey, Bruno S. & Eichenberger, Reiner, 1996. "To harmonize or to compete? That's not the question," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 335-349, June.
    5. Helmut Karl & Omar Ranné, 1997. "European environmental policy between decentralisation and uniformity," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 32(4), pages 159-169, July.
    6. Jan Werner & David Nguyen-Thanh, 2007. "Municipal Infrastructure Delivery in Ethiopia: A bottomless pit or an option to reach the Millennium Development Goals?," Working Papers 01-2007, Institute of Local Public Finance.
    7. Dohse, Dirk, 2000. "Regionen als Innovationsmotoren: zur Neuorientierung in der deutschen Technologiepolitik," Kiel Discussion Papers 366, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Dohse, Dirk, 2000. "Technology policy and the regions -- the case of the BioRegio contest," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1111-1133, December.
    9. Seliger Bernhard, 2001. "Die Krise der sozialen Sicherung und die Globalisierung – Politische Mythen und ordnungspolitische Wirklichkeit," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 52(1), pages 215-238, January.
    10. Bruno S. Frey & Armin Steuernagel & Jonas Friedrich, 2018. "Future European Alliance - Europe as a Flexible Democracy," CESifo Working Paper Series 7270, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-24262-7_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.