IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/mgt/micp15/339-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Corporate Social Responsibility depending on the Size of Business Entity

Author

Listed:
  • Tatjana Horvat

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

Abstract

We investigated the reasons for and against corporate social responsibility (CSR) and how those reasons and planning of CSR activities are related to the size of business entity. In our study, we focused on companies in the Southeast Slovenia, which is the biggest and medium-developed region in Slovenia. The population in this region consists of 191 companies, the survey questionnaire was fully replied by 74 companies. We found that the three main reasons against CSR are lack of financial resources, lack of adequate staff and lack of time. Among the main reasons for CSR are company's reputation, customer loyality and observance of the law. For testing the main reasons we used contingency table and Chi-square test. We found that, the main reasons against CSR and planning of CSR are dependent on the size of the company. On the other hand, the main reasons for CSR are not dependent on the size of the company. Small entities are under increasing influence of reasons against the introduction of CSR, while larger companies the reasons against generally do not indicate or indicate to a lesser extent. Companies irrespective of their size indicate approximately the same reasons for CSR. Smaller companies mostly does not prepared plans of CSR practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatjana Horvat, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility depending on the Size of Business Entity," MIC 2015: Managing Sustainable Growth; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Portorož, Slovenia, 28–30 May 2015,, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:micp15:339-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-181-6/121.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cene Bavec, 2012. "Social Responsibility and Professional Ethics in Management: Some Empirical Evidences at Country Levels," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 10(4 (Winter), pages 361-377.
    2. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    3. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Sipa & Malgorzata Smolarek & Tomasz Jalowiec & Piotr Masloch & Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciula & Grzegorz Masloch, 2021. "Diversity of Factors Determining Employee Satisfaction as an Area of CSR Activity in Companies of Different Scale," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 507-522.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faraji, Omid & Ezadpour, Mostafa & Rahrovi Dastjerdi, Alireza & Dolatzarei, Ehsan, 2022. "Conceptual structure of balanced scorecard research: A co-word analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Richter, Ulf Henning & Shirodkar, Vikrant & Shete, Namita, 2021. "Firm-level indicators of instrumental and political CSR processes – A multiple case study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 279-290.
    3. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Mariusz Zielinski, 2020. "How CSR Affects Polish Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 785-803.
    4. Ahmad Fathi Alheet, 2019. "Exploring the Impact of Environmental Sustainability on Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Industry in Jordan," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(8), pages 110-117, 08-2019.
    5. Piotr Ratajczak, 2021. "The mediating role of natural and social resources in the corporate social responsibility—corporate financial performance relationship," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 100-119, January.
    6. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    7. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    8. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 463-493, May.
    9. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2578-2587, November.
    10. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    11. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Xiaodong Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Lopin Kuo & Bao-Guang Chang, 2023. "Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 511-549, June.
    13. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Md. Ahashan Habib & Md. Rezaul Karim & Marzia Dulal & Mohammad Shayekh Munir, 2022. "Impact of Institutional Pressure on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Jaime Burgos & María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Assessment of Social Responsibility in Education in Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-38, June.
    16. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2008. "Corporate citizenship as stakeholder management: An ordonomic approach to business ethics," Discussion Papers 2008-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Francesco Gangi & Mario Mustilli & Nicola Varrone & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Banks’ Financial Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 42-58, October.
    18. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    19. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    20. Yu-Muo Lee & Jin-Li Hu, 2018. "Integrated Approaches for Business Sustainability: The Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:micp15:339-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.