IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/mpifgs/7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem: Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung

Author

Listed:
  • Hohn, Hans-Willy
  • Schimank, Uwe

Abstract

Neben der Forschung an den Hochschulen und in der Industrie hat sich die staatlich finanzierte außeruniversitäre Forschung zu einem eigenständigen Sektor des Forschungssystems in der Bundesrepublik entwickelt. Die empirische Untersuchung zeichnet zunächst nach, wie sich die finanzielle und personelle Ressourcenausstattung verschiedener Gruppen der zu diesem Sektor gehörenden Forschungsorganisationen entwickelt hat. Kern der Studie ist der Prozeß der Ausdifferenzierung und Spezialisierung bestimmter Typen von Forschung seit 1945 und dessen politische Steuerbarkeit. Es zeigt sich, daß die konflikthaften Auseinandersetzungen zwischen den beteiligten Akteuren institutionelle Gleichgewichte hervorgebracht haben, zu denen für die einzelnen Akteure keine individuell vorteilhafteren Alternativen erkennbar sind. Insgesamt kann die Entwicklung dieses forschungspolitischen Sektors als eine von niemandem so gewollte, aber dennoch nicht zufällige Ordnungsbildung charakterisiert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Hohn, Hans-Willy & Schimank, Uwe, 1990. "Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem: Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 7, number 7.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209599/1/mpifg-bd-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael D. McGinnis, 1986. "Issue Linkage and the Evolution of International Cooperation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(1), pages 141-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Lehrer, 2007. "Organizing knowledge spillovers when basic and applied research are interdependent: German biotechnology policy in historical perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 277-296, June.
    2. Marin, Bernd & Mayntz, Renate (ed.), 1991. "Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 9, number 9.
    3. Braun, Dietmar, 1993. "Politische Steuerungsfähigkeit in intermediären Systemen am Beispiel der Forschungsförderung," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Giesecke, Susanne, 2000. "The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 205-223, February.
    5. Schimank, Uwe & Stucke, Andreas (ed.), 1994. "Coping with Trouble: How Science Reacts to Political Disturbances of Research Conditions," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 14, number 14.
    6. Lengwiler, Martin, 2005. "Probleme anwendungsorientierter Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften am Beispiel der Ausgründung choice," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1988. "Decision Rules, Decision Styles, and Policy Choices," MPIfG Discussion Paper 88/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1991. "Die Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Mayntz, Renate, 1991. "Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Heinze, Thomas & Kuhlmann, Stefan, 2008. "Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 888-899, June.
    11. Wilts, Arnold, 2000. "Forms of research organisation and their responsiveness to external goal setting," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 767-781, June.
    12. Heinze, Thomas & Kuhlmann, Stefan, 2006. "Analysis of heterogeneous collaboration in the German research system with a focus on nanotechnology," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 6, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    13. Grande, Edgar, 2001. "The erosion of state capacity and the European innovation policy dilemma: A comparison of German and EU information technology policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 905-921, June.
    14. Mayntz, Renate, 1998. "Socialist academies of sciences: the enforced orientation of basic research at user needs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 781-791, December.
    15. Fritz W. Scharpf, 1991. "Response to Steven J. Brams and Bruno S. Frey," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(2), pages 261-265, April.
    16. Lehrer, Mark & Asakawa, Kazuhiro & Behnam, Michael, 2011. "Home base-compensating R&D: Indicators, public policy, and ramifications for multinational firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 42-53, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Yinxi & Xie, Yang, 2017. "Machiavellian experimentation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 685-711.
    2. Benz, Arthur, 1991. "Mehr-Ebenen-Verflechtung: Politische Prozesse in verbundenen Entscheidungsarenen," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1993. "Positive und negative Koordination in Verhandlungssystemen," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1991. "Koordination durch Verhandlungssysteme: Analytische Konzepte und institutionelle Lösungen am Beispiel der Zusammenarbeit zwischen zwei Bundesländern," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Luke Houghton & Larry Crump, 2016. "Temporal Events and Problem Structuring," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 324-340, May.
    6. Peter Knaack & Saori N. Katada, 2013. "Fault Lines and Issue Linkages at the G20: New Challenges for Global Economic Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(3), pages 236-246, September.
    7. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1989. "Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Complete Information," MPIfG Discussion Paper 89/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Lohmann, Susanne, 1997. "Is Japan Special? Monetary Linkages and Price Stability," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 15(2), pages 63-79, December.
    9. Schimank, Uwe, 1994. "Ressourcenverknappung und/oder Leistungsdefizite: Probleme der westdeutschen Hochschulforschung seit Mitte der siebziger Jahre," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1990. "Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Connectedness," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.