IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/180.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Erfolgsdeterminanten für eine sozialintegrative regionale Innovationspolitik: Vergleichende Analyse von 15 Fallbeispielen

Author

Listed:
  • Guth, Michael
  • Jakobs, Susanne
  • Kodré, Petra
  • Mühlenfeld, Claudia
  • Noetzel, Roman

Abstract

Die Massenarbeitslosigkeit hat sich in Deutschland verfestigt. Die Wachstumsraten geraten eher bescheiden, auch wenn gerade in jüngster Zeit Aufhellungen sichtbar werden. 'Innovationen' gelten in dieser Situation vielen als eine Art Königsweg zur Schaffung neuer Einkommens- und Beschäftigungsmöglichkeiten. Doch Innovationen, seien es technologische Modernisierungen, neue Managementtechniken, die Erschließung bislang nicht bedienter Märkte oder auch - nicht zu vernachlässigen - die Summe zahlreicher ständiger, aber meist kleiner Verbesserungen, wirken in den Betrieben, den Regionen und in der Volkswirtschaft insgesamt nicht immer in der gewünschten Richtung. Vielfach gehen Modernisierungen eben mit Freisetzungen einher, verschärfen also soziale Problemfelder, statt sie - wie erhofft - zu beheben. Insbesondere in Regionen mit angespannter Arbeitsmarktlage, industriellen Umbrüchen und schwachen Wachstumsraten, wie zum Beispiel dem Ruhrgebiet, eine fatale Situation.Wie Innovationspolitik angesichts dieses Dilemmas erfolgreich ausgestaltet werden kann, zeigt die vorliegende Studie des nordrhein-westfälischen Zentrums für Innovation und Technik (ZENIT). Untersucht wurden dazu 15 innovationspolitische Ansätze aus deutschen und Europäischen Regionen. Und im Ergebnis zeigt sich, dass Innovation und sozialer Ausgleich so gegensätzlich gar nicht sind. Im Gegenteil. Denn gerade die Untersuchungsregionen mit den besten Innovationsnoten zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass sie Maßnahmen zur Schaffung von Chancengleichheit, Abbau von Diskriminierungen sowie Qualifizierungs- und Beschäftigungsmaßnahmen in ihre Innovationsstrategie integriert haben.Einen innovationspolitischen Königsweg konnte auch die vorliegende Arbeit nicht identifizieren. Die Untersuchung hat aber gezeigt, dass Innovation eine konkrete Handlungsoption für alle Regionen ist - gerade auch für altindustrielle Gebiete, die vom Strukturwandel betroffen sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Guth, Michael & Jakobs, Susanne & Kodré, Petra & Mühlenfeld, Claudia & Noetzel, Roman, 2007. "Erfolgsdeterminanten für eine sozialintegrative regionale Innovationspolitik: Vergleichende Analyse von 15 Fallbeispielen," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 180.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/116428/1/edition_hbs_180.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudio Farina & Brigitte Preissl, 2000. "Research and Technology Organisations in National Systems of Innovation," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 221, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Ulrike Kugler, 2000. "Die Evaluation wirtschaftspolitischer Programme am Beispiel der EU-Strukturfonds-Programme im Land Bremen," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(3), pages 406-424.
    3. Dohse, Dirk, 2000. "Regionen als Innovationsmotoren: zur Neuorientierung in der deutschen Technologiepolitik," Kiel Discussion Papers 366, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. McKelvey, Maureen & Alm, Hakan & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2003. "Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 483-501, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    2. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    3. Asheim, Bjorn T. & Coenen, Lars, 2005. "Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1173-1190, October.
    4. Shuli Gao & Yanli Guo & Jianbin Chen & Lin Li, 2016. "Factors affecting the performance of knowledge collaboration in virtual team based on capital appreciation," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 119-131, June.
    5. Rosamaria d’Amore & Roberto Iorio & Agnieszka Stawinoga, 2011. "Who and where are the co-authors? The relationship between institutional and geographical distance in scientific publications," Working Papers 2011.4, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    6. Laamanen, Tomi, 2005. "Dependency, resource depth, and supplier performance during industry downturn," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-140, March.
    7. Franz Toedtling & Patrick Lehner, 2006. "Do Different Types of Innovation Require Specific Kinds of Knowledge Links?," ERSA conference papers ersa06p513, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino & Raffaele Paci & Jordy Suriñach & Corinne Autant-Bernard & Sylvie Chalaye & Elisa Gagliardini & Stefano Usai, 2017. "European Knowledge Neighbourhood: Knowledge Production in EU Neighbouring Countries and Intensity of the Relationship with EU Countries," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(1), pages 52-75, February.
    9. Shu Yu & Takaya Yuizono, 2021. "A Proximity Approach to Understanding University-Industry Collaborations for Innovation in Non-Local Context: Exploring the Catch-Up Role of Regional Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Margarida Fontes, 2005. "Distant networking: The knowledge acquisition strategies of 'out-cluster' biotechnology firms," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 899-920, September.
    11. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    12. Massimo G. Colombo & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra & Andrea Bonaccorsi, 2022. "The “first match” between high-tech entrepreneurial ventures and universities: the role of founders’ social ties," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 270-306, February.
    13. Andreas Fier & Dietmar Harhoff, 2002. "Die Evolution der bundesdeutschen Forschungs– und Technologiepolitik: Rückblick und Bestandsaufnahme," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 3(3), pages 279-301, August.
    14. Tödtling, Franz & Lehner, Patrick & Trippl, Michaela, 2004. "Knowledge intensive industries, networks, and collective learning," SRE-Discussion Papers 2004/02, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    15. Koen Frenken & Roderik Ponds & Frank Van Oort, 2010. "The citation impact of research collaboration in science‐based industries: A spatial‐institutional analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(2), pages 351-271, June.
    16. Ina Drejer & Anker Lund Vinding, 2005. "Location and collaboration: Manufacturing firms' use of knowledge intensive services in product innovation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 879-898, September.
    17. Sam Tavassoli & Lars Bengtsson & Charlie Karlsson, 2017. "Strategic entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers: spatial and aspatial perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 233-249, March.
    18. Johannes Pol & Jean-Paul Rameshkoumar, 2018. "The co-evolution of knowledge and collaboration networks: the role of the technology life-cycle," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 307-323, January.
    19. Plechero, Monica & Chaminade, Cristina, 2010. "From new to the firm to new to the world. Effect of geographical proximity and technological capabilities on the degree of novelty in emerging economies," Papers in Innovation Studies 2010/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. Michaela Trippl & Joshua von Gabain & Franz Tödtling, 2006. "Policy agents as catalysts of knowledge links in the biotechnology sector," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2006_01, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.