IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/iwe/ecbook/201411.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Chinese investments and financial engagement in Visegrad countries - Myth or reality?

Editor

Listed:
  • Agnes Szunomar
    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

With rapidly growing outward foreign direct investment Chinese companies increasingly target Central and Eastern European countries, where Visegrad countries – the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – are among the most popular destinations for Chinese investors. Chinese investment in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region constitutes quite a small share in China’s total FDI in Europe (around 10%) and is quite a new phenomenon but since 2006 we could observe rising inflows of Chinese investments in the region which are currently expected to increase due to recent political developments. There are quite a few comprehensive analysis which focuses on Chinese investments in Central and Eastern Europe so far, despite the recent change in the relations: on one hand, the transformation of the global economy is responsible for growing Chinese interest in CEE, but on the other hand, CEE represents new challenges and new opportunities for China, too. The growth potential, institutional stability and market size make the CEE region an attractive place for Chinese investments. The European sovereign debt crisis has been an additional impetus for both China and the V4 countries to strengthen their economic relations. This book consists of the studies prepared in the framework of the project ‘Chinese financial assistance in Visegrad countries: myth or reality?’. The research analyzed Chinese investments in Visegrad countries before and after the crisis with a special focus on Chinese financial engagement. In addition to economic issues and intents, the research examined the underlying political interests of both sides as well as the attitude of V4 societies to incoming Chinese capital and growing influence. The research project was supported by the International Visegrad Fund and coordinated by the Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences with the contribution of various institutes and think-tanks from Visegrad countries, such as the East Asian Center of Warsaw School of Economics, the Institute of International Relations (Prague) and the Institute of Asian Studies (Bratislava). The book provides a closer insight into the results of the above-mentioned research on Chinese investments in the Visegrad region. After a general overview on Chinese outward foreign direct investment in Europe and the CEE region, four studies deal with the relationships of individual V4 countries with China with a special focus on investment issues. The study ‘China’s public diplomacy toward Visegrad countries: beyond economic influence?’ presents the Chinese steps and intentions towards the V4 region from a Chinese point of view, while the next studies ‘The Visegrad countries’ Political Relations with China: Goals, results and prospects’ and ‘Towards tapping Visegrad countries’ full potential for attracting Chinese OFDI’ focus on future prospects of the relation. All of the studies draw relevant conclusions and provide recommendations on potential tasks and policies for further development.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnes Szunomar (ed.), 2014. "Chinese investments and financial engagement in Visegrad countries - Myth or reality?," Economic books, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, number 201411.
  • Handle: RePEc:iwe:ecbook:201411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vgi.krtk.hu/files/Chinese%20investments%20and%20financial%20engagement%20in%20Visegrad%20countries.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kocenda, Evzen & Valachy, Juraj, 2006. "Exchange rate volatility and regime change: A Visegrad comparison," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 727-753, December.
    2. Marius Brülhart & Matthieu Crozet & Pamina Koenig, 2004. "Enlargement and the EU Periphery: The Impact of Changing Market Potential," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 853-875, June.
    3. Anna Golejewska, 2012. "Competitiveness, innovation and regional development. The case of the Visegrad Group countries," Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division 1203, The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division.
    4. Bruce A. Blonigen & Jeremy Piger, 2019. "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Foreign Direct Investment, chapter 1, pages 3-54, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Tomanova, Lucie, 2013. "Exchange Rate Volatility and the Foreign Trade in CEEC," EY International Congress on Economics I (EYC2013), October 24-25, 2013, Ankara, Turkey 267, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
    6. Bartha, Zoltán & S. Gubik, Andrea, 2014. "The Outward Focused Development Path in the Visegrad Countries," MPRA Paper 57213, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Jun 2014.
    7. Anna Golejewska, 2013. "Competitiveness, Innovation and Regional Development. The Case of the Visegrad Group Countries," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 7-8, pages 87-112.
    8. Khan, Mashrur Mustaque & Akbar, Mashfique Ibne, 2013. "The Impact of Political Risk on Foreign Direct Investment," MPRA Paper 47283, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Janos Kornai, 2006. "The Great Transformation Of Central Eastern Europe: Success And Disappointment - First Published," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 2(4), pages 11-38.
    10. Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2008. "The impact of EU enlargement on European border regions," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 163-186.
    11. Mihály Borsi & Norbert Metiu, 2015. "The evolution of economic convergence in the European Union," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 657-681, March.
    12. Jitka Poměnková & Svatopluk Kapounek & Roman Maršálek, 2014. "Variability of Dynamic Correlation - The Evidence of Sector-Specific Shocks in V4 Countries," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 371-387.
    13. Laura CASI & Laura RESMINI, 2010. "Evidence on the determinants of foreign direct investment: the case of EU regions," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 1, pages 93-118, December.
    14. Krzysztof Beck & Jakub Janus, 2014. "Synchronization Of Economic Shocks In The Visegrad Group: An Empirical Assessment," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    15. Bartha, Zoltán & S. Gubik, Andrea, 2014. "Specifics of International Business Competitiveness in Visegrad Countries – Qualitative Analysis of Selected Case Studies," MPRA Paper 57211, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jun 2014.
    16. Demian Calin-Vlad, 2013. "Eu enlargement and the gains from trade," FIW Working Paper series 108, FIW.
    17. János Kornai, 2008. "The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe: Success and Disappointment," International Economic Association Series, in: János Kornai & László Mátyás & Gérard Roland (ed.), Institutional Change and Economic Behaviour, chapter 1, pages 1-37, Palgrave Macmillan.
    18. Paul Hubbard & Samuel Hurley & Dhruv Sharma, 2012. "The familiar pattern of Chinese consumption growth," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 4, pages 63-78, December.
    19. Engelbrecht, Hans-Jurgen, 1997. "A comparison and critical assessment of Porat and Rubin's information economy and Wallis and North's transaction sector1," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 271-290, December.
    20. Antonis Adam & Mr. James McHugh & Mr. Theodora Kosma, 2003. "Trade Liberalization Strategies: What Could South Eastern Europe Learn From Cefta and Bfta?," IMF Working Papers 2003/239, International Monetary Fund.
    21. János Kornai, 2006. "Velká transformace střední a východní Evropy: úspěch a zklamání [The great transformation of central and eastern Europe: success and disappointment]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(4), pages 435-466.
    22. Messely, Lies & Dessein, Joost & Lauwers, Ludwig H., 2009. "Branding Regional Identity As A Driver For Rural Development," 113th Seminar, December 9-11, 2009, Belgrade, Serbia 57406, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Schweickert & Inna Melnykovska & Ansgar Belke & Ingo Bordon, 2011. "Prospective NATO or EU membership and institutional change in transition countries," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 19(4), pages 667-692, October.
    2. Rumen Dobrinsky & Peter Havlik, 2014. "Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession," wiiw Research Reports 395, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Mitze, Timo & Breidenbach, Philipp, 2023. "The complex regional effects of macro-institutional shocks: Evidence from EU economic integration over three decades," Ruhr Economic Papers 1007, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Belke, Ansgar & Bordon, Ingo G. & Melnykovska, Inna & Schweickert, Rainer, 2009. "Prospective membership and institutional change in transition countries," Kiel Working Papers 1562, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Wani, Mr. Nassir Ul Haq & Rehman, Mr. Noor, 2017. "Determinants of FDI in Afghanistan: An Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 81975, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 May 2016.
    6. Ketevani Kapanadze, 2021. "Checkmate! Losing with Borders, Winning with Centers. The Case of European Integration," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp716, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    7. Michael Pfaffermayr & Peter Huber & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2004. "Market Potential and Border Effects in Europe," WIFO Working Papers 235, WIFO.
    8. Michael Moritz, 2011. "Spatial effects of open borders on the Czech labour market," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 19(2), pages 305-331, April.
    9. Sicong Li, 2020. "Determinants of Chinese Direct Investment in Central-East Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative Framework: A Panel Data Analysis," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 62-81, October.
    10. Christophe Sohn & Julien Licheron & Evert Meijers, 2022. "Border cities: Out of the shadow," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 417-438, April.
    11. Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), 2011. "Institutional Variety in East Asia," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14221.
    12. Peter Huber & Michael Pfaffermayr & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2011. "Are There Border Effects in the EU Wage Function?," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 2, pages 23-41, June.
    13. Klára Szita Tóthné, 2014. "Green Growth in the OECD: State of the Art," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(02), pages 59-65.
    14. Jutta Gunther & Gresa Latifi & Judyta Lubacha-Sember & Daniel Tobelmann, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation in a German-Polish Border Region in the Light of EU Enlargement," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 42-53.
    15. Erkki K. Laitinen & Oliver Lukason, 2014. "Do firm failure processes differ across countries: evidence from Finland and Estonia," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 810-832, November.
    16. Mitze, Timo & Breidenbach, Philipp, 2018. "Economic integration and growth at the margin: A space-time incremental impact analysis," Ruhr Economic Papers 775, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Fałkowski, Jan, 2016. "Promoting change or preserving the status quo? - the consequences of dominating local politics by agricultural interests. Some evidence on structural change in Poland during the transition period," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 245115, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Tamás Krisztin & Philipp Piribauer, 2021. "Modelling European regional FDI flows using a Bayesian spatial Poisson interaction model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(3), pages 593-616, December.
    19. László Szerb & William Trumbull, 2015. "Entrepreneurship and transition in the European transition countries," ERSA conference papers ersa15p669, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Maria Florencia Granato, 2011. "REGIONAL NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY (refereed paper)," ERSA conference papers ersa10p747, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwe:ecbook:201411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanász Mária (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vkhashu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.