IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/266619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The untamed and discreet role of data brokers in surveillance capitalism: A transnational and interdisciplinary overview

Author

Listed:
  • Reviglio, Urbano

Abstract

Data brokers have a significant role in data markets and, more broadly, in surveillance capitalism. Due to increasingly sophisticated techniques, data brokers allow for pervasive datafication. This not only seriously threatens privacy, but also national security and the necessary trust for data markets to function properly. The data broker industry, however, is an under-researched and under-regulated subject. Thus, this article provides an up-to-date critical literature review, highlighting innovative policy proposals and elaborating further research questions. Overall, apart from strengthening privacy protection, the article makes a case for further research on data brokers and a more inclusive international discussion that may eventually lead to a new social contract for data that is focused, above all, on data standardisation, economic incentives, data brokers' legal definitions, and the creation of an oversight authority.

Suggested Citation

  • Reviglio, Urbano, 2022. "The untamed and discreet role of data brokers in surveillance capitalism: A transnational and interdisciplinary overview," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:266619
    DOI: 10.14763/2022.3.1670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/266619/1/1815351225.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2022.3.1670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nico Neumann & Catherine E. Tucker & Timothy Whitfield, 2019. "Frontiers: How Effective Is Third-Party Consumer Profiling? Evidence from Field Studies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 918-926, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Padden, Michaela, 2023. "The transformation of surveillance in the digitalisation discourse of the OECD: A brief genealogy," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(3), pages 1-39.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Affeldt, P. & Argentesi, E. & Filistrucchi, Lapo, 2021. "Estimating Demand with Multi-Homing in Two-Sided Markets," Other publications TiSEM 1317bf39-d02e-4f61-a34f-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Koski, Heli & Kässi, Otto & Braesemann, Fabian, 2020. "Killers on the Road of Emerging Start-ups – Implications for Market Entry and Venture Capital Financing," ETLA Working Papers 81, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    3. David A. Schweidel & Yakov Bart & J. Jeffrey Inman & Andrew T. Stephen & Barak Libai & Michelle Andrews & Ana Babić Rosario & Inyoung Chae & Zoey Chen & Daniella Kupor & Chiara Longoni & Felipe Thomaz, 2022. "How consumer digital signals are reshaping the customer journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1257-1276, November.
    4. Garrett Johnson & Julian Runge & Eric Seufert, 2022. "Privacy-Centric Digital Advertising: Implications for Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 9(1), pages 49-54, June.
    5. Joo, Mingyu & Kim, Seung Hyun & Ghose, Anindya & Wilbur, Kenneth C., 2023. "Designing Distributed Ledger technologies, like Blockchain, for advertising markets," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 12-21.
    6. Tesary Lin & Sanjog Misra, 2022. "Frontiers: The Identity Fragmentation Bias," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 433-440, May.
    7. Andre Veiga & Tommaso Valletti, 2020. "Attention, recall and purchase: Experimental evidence on online news and advertising," Working Papers 20-15, NET Institute.
    8. Ming-Hui Huang & Roland T. Rust, 2021. "A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 30-50, January.
    9. K. Sudhir & Seung Yoon Lee & Subroto Roy, 2021. "Lookalike Targeting on Others' Journeys: Brand Versus Performance Marketing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2302R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Jun 2022.
    10. Garrett A. Johnson & Scott K. Shriver & Shaoyin Du, 2020. "Consumer Privacy Choice in Online Advertising: Who Opts Out and at What Cost to Industry?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 33-51, January.
    11. K. Sudhir & Seung Yoon Lee & Subroto Roy, 2021. "Lookalike Targeting on Others' Journeys: Brand Versus Performance Marketing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2302, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Rene Laub & Klaus M. Miller & Bernd Skiera, 2023. "The Economic Value of User Tracking for Publishers," Papers 2303.10906, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    13. Flavio Pino, 2022. "The microeconomics of data – a survey," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 635-665, September.
    14. Chenshuo Sun & Panagiotis Adamopoulos & Anindya Ghose & Xueming Luo, 2022. "Predicting Stages in Omnichannel Path to Purchase: A Deep Learning Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 429-445, June.
    15. Nico Neumann & Catherine E. Tucker & Kumar Subramanyam & John Marshall, 2023. "Is first- or third-party audience data more effective for reaching the ‘right’ customers? The case of IT decision-makers," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 519-571, December.
    16. K. Sudhir, 2019. "Editorial: An Update on the Frontiers Section," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 913-917, November.
    17. Alessandro Acquisti, 2023. "The Economics of Privacy at a Crossroads," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Privacy, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Karthik Kannan & Rajib L. Saha & Warut Khern-am-nuai, 2022. "Identifying Perverse Incentives in Buyer Profiling on Online Trading Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 464-475, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:266619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.