IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/284925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systems of sustainability measurement in the agricultural sector (by the examples of RISE and Position Green)
[Системи вимірювання показників сталого розвитку в агросекторі (на прикладі rise та position green)]

Author

Listed:
  • Metelytsia, Volodymyr
  • Gagalyuk, Taras

Abstract

Introduction. Today, governments of developed countries and international projects are actively working on sustainable development indicators. EU agricultural policy encourages farmers to implement eco-friendly farming practices and report on their effectiveness. Considering the vector of European integration, the post-war recovery of the Ukrainian agricultural sector will require business entities to follow the experience of European colleagues to apply for foreign investments. Purpose. The article's purpose is a SWOT analysis of methods and systems for measuring indicators of sustainable development in agriculture, which cane implemented in Ukraine in the context of the post-war reconstruction of the agricultural sector based on the green economy. Materials and methods. The information base of this research is open data from the websites of international projects and organizations, survey materials conducted by the Center for Environmental Initiatives "Ekodiya", and the works of foreign and Ukrainian researchers devoted to assessing indicators of sustainable development. The methodological basis of the research is the method of systematic analysis and comparison, together with the use of induction and deduction, analogy, and logical generalization. Results. The article reveals the advantages and disadvantages of methods that can be implemented in Ukraine to measure indicators of sustainable development in the agricultural sector. In particular, topics and indicators of sustainable development according to the RISE method and the method of preparing reports in the Position Green software were disclosed. SWOT analysis showed that the RISE method needs to be updated regarding software; however, it allows for preparing various development scenarios and including interviewer comments in the report. Instead, in the Position Green software, the Sustainability Report can be designed based on different standards to meet the relevant business needs. With flexibility in creating reports and a comprehensive toolkit for collecting the necessary data, the Position Green software optimizes activities to reveal the unique potential for value creation and positive impact. Prospects. These measurement systems will be added to the sustainable development platform we are developing as part of the MSCA4Ukraine program funded by the European Union. In further studies, we will present a sustainable development platform adapted to national specifics, enabling agricultural enterprises to report on the results of implementing eco-friendly farming practices, which is vital in attracting foreign investments for the post-war recovery of Ukraine's agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Metelytsia, Volodymyr & Gagalyuk, Taras, 2024. "Systems of sustainability measurement in the agricultural sector (by the examples of RISE and Position Green) [Системи вимірювання показників сталого розвитку в агросекторі (на прикладі rise та pos," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 81(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:284925
    DOI: 10.25313/2520-2294-2024-2-9669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/284925/1/Metelytsia_2024_sustainability_measurement.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25313/2520-2294-2024-2-9669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Latruffe, Laure & Diazabakana, Ambre & Bockstaller, Christian & Desjeux, Yann & Finn, John & Kelly, Edel & Ryan, Mary & Uthes, Sandra, 2016. "Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(3), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Alexandra Langlais, 2023. "The new Common Agricultural Policy: reflecting an agro-ecological transition. The legal perspective," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 51-66, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Vrolijk & Krijn Poppe, 2021. "Cost of Extending the Farm Accountancy Data Network to the Farm Sustainability Data Network: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Li, Mo & Fu, Qiang & Singh, Vijay P. & Liu, Dong & Li, Jiang, 2020. "Optimization of sustainable bioenergy production considering energy-food-water-land nexus and livestock manure under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Stylianou, Andreas & Sdrali, Despina & Apostolopoulos, Constantinos D., 2020. "Capturing the diversity of Mediterranean farming systems prior to their sustainability assessment: The case of Cyprus," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Frýd, Lukáš & Sokol, Ondřej, 2021. "Relationships between technical efficiency and subsidies for Czech farms: A two-stage robust approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. S.P. Dissanayake & L.H.P. Gunaratne & T. Sivananthawerl & G.A.S Ginigaddara, 2021. "Is Agricultural Sustainability Positively Related with Technical Efficiency? A Case of Paddy-Cattle Integration Farming Systems, Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(12), pages 968-976, December.
    8. Ogawa, Keishi & Garrod, Guy & Yagi, Hironori, 2023. "Sustainability strategies and stakeholder management for upland farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Sulewski, Piotr & Kłoczko-Gajewska, Anna, 2018. "Development of the sustainability index of farms based on surveys and FADN sample," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 276476, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    10. Jindrich Spicka & Tomas Hlavsa & Katerina Soukupova & Marie Stolbova, 2019. "Approaches to estimation the farm-level economic viability and sustainability in agriculture: A literature review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 289-297.
    11. Lhermie, Guillaume & Wernli, Didier & Jørgensen, Peter Søgaard & Kenkel, Donald & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Tauer, Loren William & Gröhn, Yrjo Tapio, 2019. "Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Marek Gaworski & Piotr F. Borowski & Łukasz Kozioł, 2022. "Supporting Decision-Making in the Technical Equipment Selection Process by the Method of Contradictory Evaluations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Vaida Sapolaite & Armands Veveris & Artiom Volkov & Virginia Namiotko, 2019. "Dynamics in the Agricultural Sectors of the Baltic States: the Effects of the Common Agricultural Policy and Challenges for the Future," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(4), pages 211-223.
    14. Galluzzo Nicola, 2020. "A Technical Efficiency Analysis of Financial Subsidies Allocated by the Cap in Romanian Farms Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 494-505, December.
    15. Houda Chkarat & Tarek Abid & Loïc Sauvée, 2023. "Conditions for a Convergence between Digital Platforms and Sustainability in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Anja Scheurich & Alexandra Penicka & Stefan Hörtenhuber & Thomas Lindenthal & Elisabeth Quendler & Werner Zollitsch, 2021. "Elements of Social Sustainability among Austrian Hay Milk Farmers: Between Satisfaction and Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Maria G. Lampridi & Claus G. Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2019. "Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Concepts and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Jindřich Špička, 2018. "How Do Agricultural Biogas Investments Affect Czech Farms?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(4), pages 34-60.
    19. Dwi Ratna Hidayati & Elena Garnevska & Paul Childerhouse, 2021. "Sustainable Agrifood Value Chain—Transformation in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Ionuț-Alexandru Spânu & Alexandru Ozunu & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2022. "A Comparative View of Agri-Environmental Indicators and Stakeholders’ Assessment of Their Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:284925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.