IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/251719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suffizienz in der Bioökonomie: Zwischen Option und Notwendigkeit

Author

Listed:
  • Chatalova, Lioudmila

Abstract

Der Beitrag befragt die Strategie eines suffizienten, das heißt maßvollen, Ressourcenverbrauchs auf ihre Bedeutung für eine nachhaltige Bioökonomie. Dabei wird Suffizienz sowohl im Vergleich zu, als auch in Kombination mit zwei weiteren Ressourcennutzungsstrategien, der ökonomischen Effizienz und der ökologischen Konsistenz, diskutiert. Es wird argumentiert, dass selbst bei gegebener Konsistenz und einer deutlich höheren Faktorproduktivität eine nachhaltige Ressourcennutzung nicht gewährleistet ist. Der Druck eines moderaten Konsums kann dagegen die Inanspruchnahmen direkter und indirekter Inputfaktoren verringern und somit langfristig zu einer nachhaltigeren Wirtschaftsweise führen. Wenn maßvoller Konsum durch eine geringere Intensität der Ressourcennutzung ergänzt wird, können außerdem extreme Konjunkturschwankungen vermieden werden. Für die Bioökonomie bedeutet das, dass Verbraucher und Produzenten sich gleichermaßen darauf einstellen müssen, die natürlichen Ressourcen nur in einem wirklich notwendigen Maße zu nutzen.

Suggested Citation

  • Chatalova, Lioudmila, 2022. "Suffizienz in der Bioökonomie: Zwischen Option und Notwendigkeit," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 76-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:251719
    DOI: 10.24352/UB.OVGU-2022-006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251719/1/Chatalova_2022_Suffizienz_Biooekonomie.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24352/UB.OVGU-2022-006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daly, Herman E, 1974. "The Economics of the Steady State," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 15-21, May.
    2. Alcott, Blake, 2008. "The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 770-786, February.
    3. Ayres, Robert U., 1999. "The second law, the fourth law, recycling and limits to growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 473-483, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Bruno Boidin, 2020. "Enfin la soutenabilité forte ? Économie hétérodoxe et monde post-Covid 19," Post-Print hal-04431248, HAL.
    3. Kovalev, Andrey V., 2016. "Misuse of thermodynamic entropy in economics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 129-136.
    4. Genc, S. & Sorguven, E. & Ozilgen, M. & Aksan Kurnaz, I., 2013. "Unsteady exergy destruction of the neuron under dynamic stress conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 422-431.
    5. Cairns, Robert D. & Del Campo, Stellio & Martinet, Vincent, 2019. "Sustainability of an economy relying on two reproducible assets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-160.
    6. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Ling Bai & Tianran Guo & Wei Xu & Kang Luo, 2022. "The Spatial Differentiation and Driving Forces of Ecological Welfare Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Castro, Damaris & Bleys, Brent, 2023. "Do people think they have enough? A subjective income sufficiency assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Alcott, Blake, 2008. "The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 770-786, February.
    10. Wenzlaff, Ferdinand & Kimmich, Christian & Richters, Oliver, 2014. "Theoretische Zugänge eines Wachstumszwangs in der Geldwirtschaft," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 45, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    11. Karen Turner, 2013. ""Rebound" Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    12. Jin Xue & Hans Jakob Walnum & Carlo Aall & Petter Næss, 2016. "Two Contrasting Scenarios for a Zero-Emission Future in a High-Consumption Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Jan Streeck & Quirin Dammerer & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Fridolin Krausmann, 2021. "The role of socio‐economic material stocks for natural resource use in the United States of America from 1870 to 2100," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1486-1502, December.
    14. Berthold, Anne & Cologna, Viktoria & Siegrist, Michael, 2022. "The influence of scarcity perception on people's pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Chuansheng Wu & Yuyue Li & Lingling Qi, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Green Transformation on Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Case Study of 78 Cities in Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Smith, Tom & McKnight, Brent, 2016. "Environmental finance: A research agenda for interdisciplinary finance research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 124-130.
    17. Anna Lewandowska & Joanna Witczak & Pasquale Giungato & Christian Dierks & Przemyslaw Kurczewski & Katarzyna Pawlak-Lemanska, 2018. "Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Mark G. Edwards, 2021. "The growth paradox, sustainable development, and business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3079-3094, November.
    19. Sousa, Tania & Domingos, Tiago, 2006. "Is neoclassical microeconomics formally valid? An approach based on an analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 160-169, June.
    20. Küçük, Kübra & Tevatia, Rahul & Sorgüven, Esra & Demirel, Yaşar & Özilgen, Mustafa, 2015. "Bioenergetics of growth and lipid production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 503-510.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:251719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.