IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/233974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic humanitarianism: the Mission France of Médecins Sans Frontières and Médecins du Monde

Author

Listed:
  • Hanrieder, Tine
  • Galesne, Claire

Abstract

What are the boundaries of humanitarianism? This question is controversially debated among humanitarian practitioners and scholars, given ever-changing spaces and temporalities of human suffering. This paper explores an understudied site of this controversy: the domestic humanitarian engagement of Médecins Sans Frontières and Médecins du Monde, two NGOs widely regarded as epitomes of liberal international humanitarianism. Their Mission France started in the 1980s to support vulnerable populations in France through medical aid, socio-legal support, and political activism. It has provoked fierce internal opposition ever since, in the name of an inherited vision of humanitarianism as impartial emergency aid. Drawing on organisational documents, archival sources and key informant interviews, we analyse how these conflicts gave rise to an unstable settlement around the diagnostic function of Mission France: Leaders aimed to make the assistance function of Mission France secondary to the advocacy function of drawing attention to health inequity, thus avoiding any long-term substitution for state services. However, the political strategizing demanded by this approach clashed with local volunteer preferences for immediate aid and claims to political neutrality. This conflict about the hierarchy of humanitarian values in the NGOs’ home country sheds new light on the contentious politics of humanitarian witnessing and assistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanrieder, Tine & Galesne, Claire, 2021. "Domestic humanitarianism: the Mission France of Médecins Sans Frontières and Médecins du Monde," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(8), pages 1715-1732.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:233974
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2021.1916393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233974/3/Full-text-article-Hanrieder-et-al-Domestic-humanitarianism-the.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2021.1916393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanne Haaland & Hege Wallevik, 2019. "Beyond crisis management? The role of Citizen Initiatives for Global Solidarity in humanitarian aid: the case of Lesvos," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(10), pages 1869-1883, October.
    2. Krause, Monika, 2014. "The Good Project," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226131221, November.
    3. François Debrix, 1998. "Deterritorialised territories, borderless borders: the new geography of international medical assistance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 827-846, December.
    4. Barnett, Michael, 2009. "Evolution Without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 621-663, October.
    5. David Lewis, 2019. "Humanitarianism, civil society and the Rohingya refugee crisis in Bangladesh," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(10), pages 1884-1902, October.
    6. Anne-Meike Fechter & Anke Schwittay, 2019. "Citizen aid: grassroots interventions in development and humanitarianism," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(10), pages 1769-1780, October.
    7. Bertrand Taithe, 2019. "Demotic humanitarians: historical perspectives on the global reach of local initiatives, 1940–2017," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(10), pages 1781-1798, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Lipson, 2017. "Miriam Bradley. 2016. Protecting civilians in war: The ICRC, UNHCR, and their limitations in internal armed conflicts (Oxford: Oxford University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 147-150, March.
    2. Sara de Jong & Ward Berenschot & David Ehrhardt & Oliver Walton, 2023. "Agents of order? Brokerage and empowerment in development and conflict," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 385-400, April.
    3. Cullen Hendrix & Wendy Wong, 2014. "Knowing your audience: How the structure of international relations and organizational choices affect amnesty international’s advocacy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 29-58, March.
    4. Laiz, Álvaro Morcillo, 2022. "The Cold War Origins of Global IR. The Rockefeller Foundation and Realism in Latin America," SocArXiv g9xqb, Center for Open Science.
    5. Beck, Erin, 2016. "Repopulating Development: An Agent-Based Approach to Studying Development Interventions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 19-32.
    6. Silke Roth, 2019. "Linguistic Capital and Inequality in Aid Relations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(1), pages 38-54, March.
    7. Willem Elbers & Lau Schulpen & Emma Frobisher, 2022. "Stuck in a “Catch-22”: Why Donors Fail to Include Grassroots Perspectives on CSO Legitimacy," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 921-939, April.
    8. Bello-Bravo, Julia, 2020. "Managing biodiversity & divinities: Case study of one twenty-year humanitarian forest restoration project in Benin," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Viviane Frings‐Hessami & Gillian Oliver, 2022. "Clashes of cultures in an international aid organisation: Information cultures, languages and the use of information systems," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1414-1429, October.
    10. Richey, Lisa Ann & Gissel, Line Engbo & Kweka, Opportuna L. & Bærendtsen, Pernille & Kragelund, Peter & Hambati, Herbert Qambalo & Mwamfupe, Asubisye, 2021. "South-South humanitarianism: The case of Covid-organics in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Michael Barnett, 2016. "Accountability and global governance: The view from paternalism," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 134-148, June.
    12. Matthew Willner‐Reid, 2021. "UNHCR’s evolving discourse on returning refugee vulnerability in Afghanistan: The law of diminishing returns," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(1), pages 39-58, January.
    13. Joseph Harris & Jonathan D. Shaffer, 2022. "Comparing disciplinary engagement in global health research across the social sciences," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(2), pages 439-454, March.
    14. Gabriel Abend, 2022. "Making Things Possible," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(1), pages 68-107, February.
    15. Martinez, Daniel E. & Cooper, David J., 2019. "Assembling performance measurement through engagement," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Kluczewska, Karolina & Kreikemeyer, Anna, 2022. "Beyond the local turn: Local orderings and ordering of international organizations," Global Cooperation Research Papers 32, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    17. Salehi, Mariam, 2022. "A processual framework for analysing liberal policy interventions in conflict contexts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue (OnlineFi, pages 1-1.
    18. Kirwan, Samuel & McDermont, Morag & Evans, Sue, 2017. "Triaging overflow: A case study of the ‘Gateway Assessment’ in the UK Citizens Advice Service," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 745-754.
    19. Holzscheiter, Anna, 2017. "Was vom arguing übrigblieb… Der Nachhall der kommunikativen Wende in den Internationalen Beziehungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 143-159.
    20. Owen, John M., 2016. "Global power shifts and the future of democracy: An evolutionary approach, with special attention to China," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2016-108, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:233974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.