IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/206537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was vom arguing übrigblieb… Der Nachhall der kommunikativen Wende in den Internationalen Beziehungen

Author

Listed:
  • Holzscheiter, Anna

Abstract

Dieser Forumsbeitrag fragt danach, welche Spuren die sogenannte zib-Debatte zur Übertragbarkeit der Habermasʼschen Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns auf die internationalen Beziehungen hinterlassen hat. Auf der Suche danach, was vom arguing übriggeblieben ist, kehrt der Beitrag zu den Ursprüngen der zib-Debatte zurück und diskutiert deren Wirkung auf das Nachdenken über den Zusammenhang zwischen Diskurs, Sein und Sollen in der internationalen Politik, sowohl innerhalb Deutschlands als auch international. Aufbauend auf den theoretischen Vorschlägen der arguing Wissenschaftler*innen argumentiert der Forumsbeitrag schließlich, dass deren Einfluss auf ontologische, epistemologische und methodologische Debatten der Gegenwart erheblich ist. Zugleich plädiert der Beitrag jedoch dafür, den Habermasʼschen Diskursbegriff nicht auf konsensorientierte Verständigung einzu- engen, sondern vielmehr sein Potenzial für die Erforschung der produktiven und mühsamen Auseinandersetzung über die die internationale Politik leitenden Normen, Werte und Ziele in Zeiten großer Unsicherheit und großen Umbruchs zu nutzen.

Suggested Citation

  • Holzscheiter, Anna, 2017. "Was vom arguing übrigblieb… Der Nachhall der kommunikativen Wende in den Internationalen Beziehungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 143-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:206537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/206537/1/Full-text-article-Holzscheiter-Was-vom-arguing.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Risse, Thomas, 2000. "“Let's Argue!†: Communicative Action in World Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 1-39, January.
    2. Deitelhoff, Nicole, 2009. "The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(1), pages 33-65, January.
    3. Pouliot, Vincent, 2008. "The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(2), pages 257-288, April.
    4. Charlotte Epstein, 2008. "The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262050927, December.
    5. Schimmelfennig, Frank, 2001. "The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(1), pages 47-80, January.
    6. Krause, Monika, 2014. "The Good Project," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226131221, September.
    7. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    8. Charlotte Epstein, 2008. "The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550695, December.
    9. Rebecca Adler-Nissen, 2016. "Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 87-103, January.
    10. Holzscheiter, Anna, 2016. "Representation as power and performative practice: Global civil society advocacy for working children," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 205-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gholiagha, Sassan & Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes & Hofius, Maren, 2021. "Meaning-in-use: Zum Verhältnis von Normativität und Normalität in der Normenforschung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 221-249.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cupać, Jelena, 2020. "Orders, purposes, and tasks: How do states act in international security organizations?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2020-104, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Holzscheiter, Anna & Gholiagha, Sassan & Liese, Andrea, 2022. "Advocacy Coalition Constellations and Norm Collisions: Insights from International Drug Control, Human Trafficking, and Child Labour," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 25-48.
    3. Adler, Emanuel & Crawford, Beverly, 2004. "Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP)," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt6xx6n5p4, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Rebecca Adler-Nissen, 2016. "Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 87-103, January.
    5. Stephen, Matthew D., 2015. "‘Can you pass the salt?’ The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 768-792.
    6. Bradley Tatar, 2023. "Advocacy, Ecotourism, and Biopolitics of Whale Conservation in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Kemi Fuentes-George, 2017. "Consensus, Certainty, and Catastrophe: Discourse, Governance, and Ocean Iron Fertilization," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 17(2), pages 125-143, May.
    8. Schmidt, Vivien A., 2013. "Does discourse matter in the politics of building social pacts on social protection?: international experiences," Políticas Sociales 6194, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    9. Andrew Hindmoor & Allan McConnell, 2013. "Why Didn't They See it Coming? Warning Signs, Acceptable Risks and the Global Financial Crisis," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(3), pages 543-560, October.
    10. Shim, David & Nabers, Dirk, 2011. "North Korea and the Politics of Visual Representation," GIGA Working Papers 164, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    11. Mick Lennon, 2015. "Explaining the currency of novel policy concepts: learning from green infrastructure planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 1039-1057, October.
    12. Shim, David, 2010. "How Signifying Practices Constitute Food (In)security: The Case of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," GIGA Working Papers 122, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    13. Mark Bevir & Oliver Daddow & Pauline Schnapper, 2015. "JCMS Special Issue 2015: Interpreting British European Policy. Guest Editors: Mark Bevir, Oliver Daddow and Pauline Schnapper," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Jessica F Green, 2017. "Policy entrepreneurship in climate governance: Toward a comparative approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1471-1482, December.
    15. Ian Wash, 2020. "Interpreting public policy dilemmas: discourse analytical insights," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Anders Blok, 2014. "Articulating Social Science in the Wild of Global Natures? On Economics and Anthropology in Transnational Environmental Politics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(9), pages 2125-2142, September.
    17. Campbell-Verduyn Malcolm, 2016. "Merely TINCering around: the shifting private authority of technology, information and news corporations," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 143-170, August.
    18. Gholiagha, Sassan & Holzscheiter, Anna & Liese, Andrea, 2020. "Activating norm collisions: Interface conflicts in international drug control," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 290-317.
    19. Kari De Pryck, 2021. "Intergovernmental Expert Consensus in the Making: The Case of the Summary for Policy Makers of the IPCC 2014 Synthesis Report," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 108-129, Winter.
    20. Tobias Nielsen, 2014. "The role of discourses in governing forests to combat climate change," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 265-280, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:206537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.