IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitmx/v10y2013i02ns0219877013400063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting Successful Standardization Processes In Complex Emerging Fields Through Quantitative Analysis — The Case Of Nanotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • KERSTIN GOLUCHOWICZ

    (Chair of Innovation Economics, Berlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), Müller-Breslau-Str. 15, VWS 2, Berlin 10623, Germany;
    Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems (FOKUS), Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 3, Berlin 10589, Germany)

  • STEPHAN GAUCH

    (Chair of Innovation Economics, Berlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), Müller-Breslau-Str. 15, VWS 2, Berlin 10623, Germany;
    Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems (FOKUS), Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 3, Berlin 10589, Germany)

  • KNUT BLIND

    (Chair of Innovation Economics, Berlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), Müller-Breslau-Str., VWS 2, Berlin 10623, Germany;
    Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems (FOKUS), Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 3, Berlin 10589, Germany;
    Chair of Standardisation, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062 PA, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The field of nanotechnology is characterized by its rapid development and a multitude of participating communities and different subareas of scientific and technical activities, challenges regarding the understanding, coordination and implementation of new technologies. By reviewing some of the main challenges for successful knowledge-based standardization in complex emerging and heterogeneous fields this paper will present a range of quantitative methods, applied to publication data, that will provide a blueprint for further foresight activities in complex R&D fields. It addresses the issue of identification and integration of topics and researchers in such research fields that can be decomposed into thematic subfields and present solutions for an integration of this plurality into standardization processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerstin Goluchowicz & Stephan Gauch & Knut Blind, 2013. "Supporting Successful Standardization Processes In Complex Emerging Fields Through Quantitative Analysis — The Case Of Nanotechnology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 1-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitmx:v:10:y:2013:i:02:n:s0219877013400063
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219877013400063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219877013400063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219877013400063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knut Blind, 2004. "The Economics of Standards," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knut Blind & Andre Jungmittag, 2008. "The impact of patents and standards on macroeconomic growth: a panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 51-60, February.
    2. Chen, Natalie & Novy, Dennis, 2012. "On the measurement of trade costs: direct vs. indirect approaches to quantifying standards and technical regulations," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 401-414, July.
    3. Martijn Van Den Hurk & Koen Verhoest, 2016. "The challenge of using standard contracts in public-private partnerships," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 278-299, February.
    4. Jong-Hyun Paik & Moon-Koo Kim & Jong-Hyun Park, 2017. "The antecedents and consequences of technology standardizations in Korean IT small and medium-sized enterprises," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 293-304, December.
    5. Clougherty, Joseph A. & Grajek, Michał, 2014. "International standards and international trade: Empirical evidence from ISO 9000 diffusion," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Germán Arana & Ernesto Cilleruelo, 2013. "Adoption of ISO 9000 management standard in EU's transition economies: the case of the Baltic states," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 481-499, June.
    7. Choung, Jae-Yong & Ji, Illyong & Hameed, Tahir, 2011. "International Standardization Strategies of Latecomers: The Cases of Korean TPEG, T-DMB, and Binary CDMA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 824-838, May.
    8. Hao Zhang & Jiadong Jiang & Liwei Zheng & Xiangzhen Li, 2019. "The interaction between standards development and economic growth of China," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Blind, Knut & Thumm, Nikolaus, 2004. "Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1583-1598, December.
    10. Jean-Christophe Graz & Nafi Niang, 2011. "Connecting India: the rise of standards in service offshoring," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(14), pages 2287-2305, March.
    11. Matteucci, Nicola, 2013. "Standards, IPR and digital TV convergence: theories and empirical evidence," MPRA Paper 59359, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2013.
    12. Jelena Ruso & Ana Horvat & Milica Marièiæ, 2019. "Do international standards influence the development of smart regions and cities?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 629-652.
    13. Wiegmann, Paul Moritz & de Vries, Henk J. & Blind, Knut, 2017. "Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1370-1386.
    14. Fatima Olanike Kareem & Olayinka Idowu Kareem, 2021. "Employment Responses to EU Food Safety Regulations: A Gendered Perspective," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1899-1929, December.
    15. Borrás, Susana & Edquist, Charles, 2013. "The choice of innovation policy instruments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1513-1522.
    16. Kwak, Jooyoung & Lee, Heejin & Chung, Do Bum, 2012. "The evolution of alliance structure in China’s mobile telecommunication industry and implications for international standardization," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 966-976.
    17. Graz Jean-Christophe & Hauert Christophe, 2014. "Beyond the transatlantic divide: the multiple authorities of standards in the global political economy of services," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 113-150, April.
    18. Kareem, Fatima Olanike & Brümmer, Bernhard & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2015. "The Implication of European Union’s Food Regulations on Developing Countries: Food Safety Standards, Entry Price System and Africa’s Export," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 198719, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    19. de Vries, H.J. & de Ruijter, J.P.M. & Argam, N., 2009. "Dominant Design or Multiple Designs: The Flash Memory Card Case," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-032-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Milne, Alistair, 2005. "Standard setting and competition in securities settlement," Research Discussion Papers 23/2005, Bank of Finland.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitmx:v:10:y:2013:i:02:n:s0219877013400063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitm/ijitm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.