IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v19y2016i3p222-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Design Pattern for Adaptive Systems Inspired by the Neocortex

Author

Listed:
  • Brian J. Phillips
  • Mark Blackburn

Abstract

This paper discusses a general design pattern that can provide systems engineering guidance for building adaptive systems. The Neocortex Adaptive System Pattern (NASP) architecture is an adaptive decision‐making architecture. It is derived from the physical architecture observed within the neocortex. It allows different adaptive system components with diverse methodologies and techniques to coexist and cooperate within a single system. A literature review of relevant neuroscience literature is provided. An architectural view, along with a taxonomy of architecture features, is explained in detail. Experiment results that compare an implemented NASP system, a non‐NASP adaptive system, and rule‐based systems within a combative simulation are presented. The NASP design pattern unifies the diverse set of algorithms and technologies found across the spectrum of adaptive systems. Evidence from this study indicates that multiple methods and time windows for adaptation can result in superior performance of the overall system. The implications of this result infer a clear preference for Bayesian‐based adaptive systems over neural network–based adaptive systems when the system faces time‐sensitive problems. This paper supports the claim of a design pattern by providing an example system that shares the same architectural features as NASP.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian J. Phillips & Mark Blackburn, 2016. "Towards a Design Pattern for Adaptive Systems Inspired by the Neocortex," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 222-234, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:222-234
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21347
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Boehm, 2006. "Some future trends and implications for systems and software engineering processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Robert Cloutier & Gerrit Muller & Dinesh Verma & Roshanak Nilchiani & Eirik Hole & Mary Bone, 2010. "The Concept of Reference Architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 14-27, March.
    3. Robert J. Cloutier & Dinesh Verma, 2007. "Applying the concept of patterns to systems architecture," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 138-154, June.
    4. Kahneman, Daniel, 2002. "Maps of Bounded Rationality," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2002-4, Nobel Prize Committee.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behrouz Sefid‐Dashti & Jafar Habibi, 2014. "A Reference Architecture for Mobile SOA," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 407-425, December.
    2. Paul De Grauwe, 2014. "Animal Spirits and Monetary Policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Exchange Rates and Global Financial Policies, chapter 18, pages 473-520, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Graupe, Silja & Steffestun, Theresa, 2018. ""The market deals out profit and losses": Wie ökonomische Standardlehrbücher das unreflektierte Denken in Metaphern fördern," Working Paper Series Ök-38, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    4. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    5. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    6. Pieter van der Spek & Chris Verhoef, 2014. "Balancing Time‐to‐Market and Quality in Embedded Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 166-192, June.
    7. Jie, Yun, 2020. "Responding to requests for help: Effects of payoff schemes with small monetary units," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Schilirò, Daniele & Graziano, Mario, 2011. "Scelte e razionalità nei modelli economici: un'analisi multidisciplinare [Choices and rationality in economic models: a multidisciplinary analysis]," MPRA Paper 31910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Matteo Coronese & Davide Luzzati, 2022. "Economic impacts of natural hazards and complexity science: a critical review," LEM Papers Series 2022/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Katarina Kostelić, 2021. "Game Awareness: A Questionnaire," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-39, December.
    11. H. R. N. van Erp & R. O. Linger & P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder, 2014. "Fact Sheet Research on Bayesian Decision Theory," Papers 1409.8269, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    12. Eric Bonsang & Eve Caroli, 2021. "Cognitive Load and Occupational Injuries," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 219-242, April.
    13. Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel & Fernández Gutiérrez, Marcos & Revuelta, Julio, 2009. "Infrastructure regulation: what works, why, and how do we know?," MPRA Paper 33038, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bell, William Paul, 2008. "Adaptive Interactive Profit Expectations and Small World Networks," MPRA Paper 37924, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Roger J. Jiao & Feng Zhou & Chih-Hsing Chu, 2017. "Decision theoretic modeling of affective and cognitive needs for product experience engineering: key issues and a conceptual framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1755-1767, October.
    16. Santiago Burone & Martin Leites, 2021. "Self-centered and non-self-centered inequality aversion matter: Evidence from Uruguay based on an experimental survey," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(2), pages 265-291, June.
    17. Hortala-Vallve, Rafael & Esteve-Volart, Berta, 2011. "Voter turnout and electoral competition in a multidimensional policy space," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 376-384, June.
    18. Guido Baltussen & G. Post & Martijn Assem & Peter Wakker, 2012. "Random incentive systems in a dynamic choice experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 15(3), pages 418-443, September.
    19. Page, Lionel & Savage, David A. & Torgler, Benno, 2014. "Variation in risk seeking behaviour following large losses: A natural experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 121-131.
    20. Sandri, Serena & Schade, Christian & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin, 2010. "Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertia in entrepreneurs' and non-entrepreneurs' disinvestment choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 30-44, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:222-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.