IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v72y2006i3p627-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Global Analysis of Constrained Behavior: The LeChatelier Principle “in the Large”

Author

Listed:
  • Jean‐Paul Chavas

Abstract

New global results are obtained on the LeChatelier‐Samuelson principle reflecting the properties of constrained behavior. Relying on the saddle point characterization of the Lagrangean, simple yet powerful LeChatelier results are derived and investigated under general conditions. The results do not require differentiability assumptions or unique solution, and they hold for discrete changes. The usefulness of the approach is illustrated in several applications, showing how the analysis generates insights into global economic adjustments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean‐Paul Chavas, 2006. "A Global Analysis of Constrained Behavior: The LeChatelier Principle “in the Large”," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(3), pages 627-644, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:72:y:2006:i:3:p:627-644
    DOI: 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00724.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00724.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00724.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Varian, Hal R, 1982. "The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 945-973, July.
    2. Takayama,Akira, 1985. "Mathematical Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314985.
    3. Sundaram,Rangarajan K., 1996. "A First Course in Optimization Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521497701.
    4. Roberts, Kevin, 1999. "Rationality and the LeChatelier Principle," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 416-428, August.
    5. Milgrom, Paul & Shannon, Chris, 1994. "Monotone Comparative Statics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 157-180, January.
    6. Hanoch, Giora & Rothschild, Michael, 1972. "Testing the Assumptions of Production Theory: A Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 80(2), pages 256-275, March-Apr.
    7. Sundaram,Rangarajan K., 1996. "A First Course in Optimization Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521497190.
    8. Anderson, Richard K. & Takayama, Akira, 1979. "Comparative statics with discrete jumps in shift parameters, or, how to do economics on the saddle(-point)," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 491-509, December.
    9. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1996. "The LeChatelier Principle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(1), pages 173-179, March.
    10. Topkis Donald M., 1995. "Comparative Statics of the Firm," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 370-401, December.
    11. Silberberg, Eugene, 1974. "A revision of comparative statics methodology in economics, or, how to do comparative statics on the back of an envelope," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, February.
    12. Varian, Hal R, 1984. "The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 579-597, May.
    13. Tatsuo Hatta, 1980. "Structure of the Correspondence Principle at an Extremum Point," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(5), pages 987-997.
    14. Pauwels, Wilfried, 1979. "On some results in comparative statics analysis," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 483-490, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daron Acemoglu, 2007. "Equilibrium Bias of Technology," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(5), pages 1371-1409, September.
    2. Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2001. "Envelope and sensitivity analysis 'in the large'," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 295-301, March.
    3. Laura Blow & Martin Browning & Ian Crawford, 2004. "Nonparametric methods for the characteristic model," CeMMAP working papers 18/04, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Aguiar, Victor H. & Kashaev, Nail & Allen, Roy, 2023. "Prices, profits, proxies, and production," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 666-693.
    5. Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Dieter Saelens & Marijn Verschelde, 2022. "Productive Efficiency Analysis with Incomplete Output Information," Working Papers ECARES 2022-21, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram Rock & Kristof Witte, 2014. "Non‐parametric Analysis of Multi‐output Production with Joint Inputs," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 124(577), pages 735-775, June.
    7. Laura Blow & Martin Browning & Ian Crawford, 2008. "Revealed Preference Analysis of Characteristics Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(2), pages 371-389.
    8. Tsur, Yacov, 1990. "Testing The Significance Of Deviations From Rational Behavior," Staff Papers 13267, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Snyder, Susan K., 1999. "Testable restrictions of Pareto optimal public good provision," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 97-119, January.
    10. Gad Allon & Michael Beenstock & Steven Hackman & Ury Passy & Alexander Shapiro, 2007. "Nonparametric estimation of concave production technologies by entropic methods," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 795-816.
    11. Mike Tsionas & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Goodness-of-fit in Optimizing Models of Production: A Generalization with a Bayesian Perspective," CEPA Working Papers Series WP182021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    12. Paul van Bruggen, 2016. "A Comment on Revealed Preference with a Subset of Goods," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-068/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. George Lady & James Quirk, 2010. "The global LeChatelier Principle and multimarket equilibria," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 193-201, March.
    14. Brenton Kenkel, 2019. "The efficacy of cheap talk in collective action problems," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(3), pages 370-402, July.
    15. Sung Ko Li, 2002. "Aggregating Capacity‐Limiting Separable Inputs," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 69(2), pages 470-478, October.
    16. Gregory Besharov, 2004. "Second‐Best Considerations in Correcting Cognitive Biases," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(1), pages 12-20, July.
    17. Diewert, W. Erwin & Fox, Kevin J., 2016. "Kevin J. Fox Interview of W. Erwin Diewert," Microeconomics.ca working papers erwin_diewert-2016-6, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 02 Jun 2016.
    18. Peter Arendorf Bache & Anders Laugesen, 2013. "An Industry-Equilibrium Analysis of the LeChatelier Principle," Economics Working Papers 2013-16, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    19. Mike G. Tsionas & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2022. "Testing for Optimization Behavior in Production when Data is with Measurement Errors: A Bayesian Approach," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012022, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    20. Nocetti, Diego C., 2013. "The LeChatelier principle for changes in risk," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 460-466.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:72:y:2006:i:3:p:627-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.